TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB

BACKGROUND In this retrospective study we evaluated effectiveness and safety of bortezomib, comparingour results with already published clinical studies. METHODS Patients received bortezomib as part of everyday clinical practice and in the range ofapproved indications. We evaluated bortezomib effect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronika Kodre, Peter Černelč
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2008-04-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/877
_version_ 1818128338037768192
author Veronika Kodre
Peter Černelč
author_facet Veronika Kodre
Peter Černelč
author_sort Veronika Kodre
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND In this retrospective study we evaluated effectiveness and safety of bortezomib, comparingour results with already published clinical studies. METHODS Patients received bortezomib as part of everyday clinical practice and in the range ofapproved indications. We evaluated bortezomib effectiveness in 66 patients according tomodified SWOG criteria and treatment responsiveness (CR, VGPR, PR, MR) or unresponsiveness (SD, PD). Treatment responsiveness was compared according to high risk (beta-2microglobulin ? 5,5 mg/L) or standard risk (beta-2 mikroglobulin < 5.5 mg/L), patient’sage (> 65 ali < 65 let), number of previous treatments (1 ali > 1) and previous treatmentwith thalidomid. Side effects and reasons for early treatment discontinuation were alsoevaluated. RESULTS Patients received 1–7 previous treatments (median 1.5). Treatment responsiveness wasobserved in 80.3 % patients (1.5 % CR, 45.5 % VGPR, 21.2 % PR and 12.1 % MR). Nostatistical significant influence was observed according to: high risk (p = 0.178), age above65 years (p = 0.756), > 1 previous treatment (p = 0.419) or previous treatment with thalidomid (p = 0.475). Side effects of bortezomib treatment were: anemia (40.9 %), peripheralneuropathy grade 3 or more (28.7 %), infections (21.2 %), herpes zooster (12.1 %), neutropenia (10.6 %), trombocitopenia (9 %) and gastro-intestinal problems (7.5 %). Earlydiscontinuation was observed due to: peripheral neuropathy (28.7 %), other seriousside effects (6 %), bortezomib uneffectiveness (19.7 %) or planned autologous transplant(15.1 %). CONCLUSIONS Bortezomib (Velcade) is effective and safe treatment also for patients with multiple myeloma that developed resistance to previous treatments or belong to high risk patient group
first_indexed 2024-12-11T07:31:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb2cef741509404da3e76600380a6fa7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T07:31:39Z
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
record_format Article
series Zdravniški Vestnik
spelling doaj.art-bb2cef741509404da3e76600380a6fa72022-12-22T01:15:49ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242008-04-0177SUPPI755TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIBVeronika KodrePeter ČernelčBACKGROUND In this retrospective study we evaluated effectiveness and safety of bortezomib, comparingour results with already published clinical studies. METHODS Patients received bortezomib as part of everyday clinical practice and in the range ofapproved indications. We evaluated bortezomib effectiveness in 66 patients according tomodified SWOG criteria and treatment responsiveness (CR, VGPR, PR, MR) or unresponsiveness (SD, PD). Treatment responsiveness was compared according to high risk (beta-2microglobulin ? 5,5 mg/L) or standard risk (beta-2 mikroglobulin < 5.5 mg/L), patient’sage (> 65 ali < 65 let), number of previous treatments (1 ali > 1) and previous treatmentwith thalidomid. Side effects and reasons for early treatment discontinuation were alsoevaluated. RESULTS Patients received 1–7 previous treatments (median 1.5). Treatment responsiveness wasobserved in 80.3 % patients (1.5 % CR, 45.5 % VGPR, 21.2 % PR and 12.1 % MR). Nostatistical significant influence was observed according to: high risk (p = 0.178), age above65 years (p = 0.756), > 1 previous treatment (p = 0.419) or previous treatment with thalidomid (p = 0.475). Side effects of bortezomib treatment were: anemia (40.9 %), peripheralneuropathy grade 3 or more (28.7 %), infections (21.2 %), herpes zooster (12.1 %), neutropenia (10.6 %), trombocitopenia (9 %) and gastro-intestinal problems (7.5 %). Earlydiscontinuation was observed due to: peripheral neuropathy (28.7 %), other seriousside effects (6 %), bortezomib uneffectiveness (19.7 %) or planned autologous transplant(15.1 %). CONCLUSIONS Bortezomib (Velcade) is effective and safe treatment also for patients with multiple myeloma that developed resistance to previous treatments or belong to high risk patient grouphttp://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/877
spellingShingle Veronika Kodre
Peter Černelč
TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
Zdravniški Vestnik
title TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
title_full TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
title_fullStr TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
title_full_unstemmed TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
title_short TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA WITH BORTEZOMIB
title_sort treatment of multiple myeloma with bortezomib
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/877
work_keys_str_mv AT veronikakodre treatmentofmultiplemyelomawithbortezomib
AT petercernelc treatmentofmultiplemyelomawithbortezomib