The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management

Abstract Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most pervasive invasive species in North America. Wild pigs pose a threat to crops, livestock, and the environment, but also provide recreational hunting opportunities. There are avenues for some stakeholder groups to generate income from wild pigs, how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha J. Leivers, Keith M. Carlisle, Rachel L. Connally, Maureen G. Frank, John M. Tomeček
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1439
_version_ 1827863030345498624
author Samantha J. Leivers
Keith M. Carlisle
Rachel L. Connally
Maureen G. Frank
John M. Tomeček
author_facet Samantha J. Leivers
Keith M. Carlisle
Rachel L. Connally
Maureen G. Frank
John M. Tomeček
author_sort Samantha J. Leivers
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most pervasive invasive species in North America. Wild pigs pose a threat to crops, livestock, and the environment, but also provide recreational hunting opportunities. There are avenues for some stakeholder groups to generate income from wild pigs, however, stakeholders vary in attitudes towards wild pigs and their management. We investigated whether financial loss and income resulting from wild pigs influenced hunter stakeholder attitudes towards their management in Texas. We examined how land use influenced hunting landowner attitudes towards wild pigs. We analyzed 22,176 responses (8,707 landowners, 13,469 nonlandowners) from Texas hunters to the Texas A&M Human Dimensions of Wild Pigs Survey. Attitudes towards wild pigs varied significantly based on landownership status and whether land was used for agricultural practices. In addition, landowners who received income from wild pigs on their land considered government or agency hunting to be a less acceptable method of control than those who did not generate such income. However, effect sizes for all our results were small (η2 ≤ 0.05, Adj. R2 ≤ 0.09, and McFadden's R2 ≤ 0.07) and, across all groups, attitudes towards wild pigs were negative. Few respondents (3.91% of landowners, 0.56% of non‐landowners) reported generating income from wild pigs, and reported losses were approximately 4 times greater than income.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:03:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb36033039a94897b87164f6c40830d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2328-5540
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:03:03Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-bb36033039a94897b87164f6c40830d52023-08-21T21:45:19ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402023-06-01472n/an/a10.1002/wsb.1439The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their managementSamantha J. Leivers0Keith M. Carlisle1Rachel L. Connally2Maureen G. Frank3John M. Tomeček4Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management Texas A&M University 495 Horticulture Road College Station TX 77843 USADepartment of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1480 Campus Delivery Fort Collins CO 80523 USADepartment of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management Texas A&M University 495 Horticulture Road College Station TX 77843 USADepartment of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management Texas A&M University 495 Horticulture Road College Station TX 77843 USADepartment of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management Texas A&M University 495 Horticulture Road College Station TX 77843 USAAbstract Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most pervasive invasive species in North America. Wild pigs pose a threat to crops, livestock, and the environment, but also provide recreational hunting opportunities. There are avenues for some stakeholder groups to generate income from wild pigs, however, stakeholders vary in attitudes towards wild pigs and their management. We investigated whether financial loss and income resulting from wild pigs influenced hunter stakeholder attitudes towards their management in Texas. We examined how land use influenced hunting landowner attitudes towards wild pigs. We analyzed 22,176 responses (8,707 landowners, 13,469 nonlandowners) from Texas hunters to the Texas A&M Human Dimensions of Wild Pigs Survey. Attitudes towards wild pigs varied significantly based on landownership status and whether land was used for agricultural practices. In addition, landowners who received income from wild pigs on their land considered government or agency hunting to be a less acceptable method of control than those who did not generate such income. However, effect sizes for all our results were small (η2 ≤ 0.05, Adj. R2 ≤ 0.09, and McFadden's R2 ≤ 0.07) and, across all groups, attitudes towards wild pigs were negative. Few respondents (3.91% of landowners, 0.56% of non‐landowners) reported generating income from wild pigs, and reported losses were approximately 4 times greater than income.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1439attitudesferal swinehuman dimensionsincomeinvasive speciesloss
spellingShingle Samantha J. Leivers
Keith M. Carlisle
Rachel L. Connally
Maureen G. Frank
John M. Tomeček
The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
Wildlife Society Bulletin
attitudes
feral swine
human dimensions
income
invasive species
loss
title The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
title_full The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
title_fullStr The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
title_full_unstemmed The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
title_short The influence of income and loss on hunters' attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
title_sort influence of income and loss on hunters attitudes towards wild pigs and their management
topic attitudes
feral swine
human dimensions
income
invasive species
loss
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1439
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthajleivers theinfluenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT keithmcarlisle theinfluenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT rachellconnally theinfluenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT maureengfrank theinfluenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT johnmtomecek theinfluenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT samanthajleivers influenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT keithmcarlisle influenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT rachellconnally influenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT maureengfrank influenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement
AT johnmtomecek influenceofincomeandlossonhuntersattitudestowardswildpigsandtheirmanagement