Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review

Background: Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Intekhab Alam, Ravi Sharma, Sachin A Borkar, Revanth Goda, Varidh Katiyar, Shashank S Kale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=3;spage=163;epage=168;aulast=Alam
_version_ 1818417647345205248
author Intekhab Alam
Ravi Sharma
Sachin A Borkar
Revanth Goda
Varidh Katiyar
Shashank S Kale
author_facet Intekhab Alam
Ravi Sharma
Sachin A Borkar
Revanth Goda
Varidh Katiyar
Shashank S Kale
author_sort Intekhab Alam
collection DOAJ
description Background: Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome. Objective: We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Methods: We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty. Results: On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty. Conclusions: Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:10:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb3f04729bbf4475a2d56ec380f439c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-8237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:10:06Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
spelling doaj.art-bb3f04729bbf4475a2d56ec380f439c72022-12-21T23:01:45ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372020-01-0111316316810.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_70_20Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical reviewIntekhab AlamRavi SharmaSachin A BorkarRevanth GodaVaridh KatiyarShashank S KaleBackground: Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome. Objective: We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Methods: We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty. Results: On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty. Conclusions: Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=3;spage=163;epage=168;aulast=Alamc2–c7 cobb's anglec2–c3 disc anglec2–c7 lordosisc2–c7 sagittal vertical axiscervical laminoplastydynamic extension reserveloss of cervical lordosist1 slope
spellingShingle Intekhab Alam
Ravi Sharma
Sachin A Borkar
Revanth Goda
Varidh Katiyar
Shashank S Kale
Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
c2–c7 cobb's angle
c2–c3 disc angle
c2–c7 lordosis
c2–c7 sagittal vertical axis
cervical laminoplasty
dynamic extension reserve
loss of cervical lordosis
t1 slope
title Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
title_full Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
title_fullStr Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
title_full_unstemmed Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
title_short Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review
title_sort factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty a critical review
topic c2–c7 cobb's angle
c2–c3 disc angle
c2–c7 lordosis
c2–c7 sagittal vertical axis
cervical laminoplasty
dynamic extension reserve
loss of cervical lordosis
t1 slope
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=3;spage=163;epage=168;aulast=Alam
work_keys_str_mv AT intekhabalam factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview
AT ravisharma factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview
AT sachinaborkar factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview
AT revanthgoda factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview
AT varidhkatiyar factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview
AT shashankskale factorspredictinglossofcervicallordosisfollowingcervicallaminoplastyacriticalreview