Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite

Although many studies have focused on processing of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), there is a considerable lack of information concerning the application of nanobubbles (NBs) in their floatabilities. To cover this knowledge gap, the current study aims at exploring the effect of key operating paramete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabereh Nazari, Shaoqi Zhou, Ahmad Hassanzadeh, Jinlong Li, Yaqun He, Xiangning Bu, Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785422013710
_version_ 1811199924633600000
author Sabereh Nazari
Shaoqi Zhou
Ahmad Hassanzadeh
Jinlong Li
Yaqun He
Xiangning Bu
Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk
author_facet Sabereh Nazari
Shaoqi Zhou
Ahmad Hassanzadeh
Jinlong Li
Yaqun He
Xiangning Bu
Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk
author_sort Sabereh Nazari
collection DOAJ
description Although many studies have focused on processing of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), there is a considerable lack of information concerning the application of nanobubbles (NBs) in their floatabilities. To cover this knowledge gap, the current study aims at exploring the effect of key operating parameters on flotation of two types of graphite i.e., lithium-ion batteries’ graphite (LIBG) and natural ore graphite (NOG) in the presence of NBs. For this purpose, the effects of NB solution ratio, impeller speed, air flow rate, as well as dosage and type of collector and frother on recovery of graphite were investigated in the presence and absence of NBs. Three frothers (i.e., methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), terpenic oil, and 2-octanol), and three collectors (i.e., n-dodecane, kerosene and diesel oil) were employed for comparison purposes using an XFG micro-flotation unit. The hydrodynamic cavitation and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods were utilized to produce and characterize ultrafine bubbles, respectively. The DLS results confirmed the bubble size distribution ranged between 180 and 400 nm. The maximum recovery of graphite particles (ca. 98%) was obtained for the LIBG particles, at an impeller speed of 1000 rpm, air flow rate of 0.4 L/min, using 2-octanol as a frother, and n-dodecane as a collector. Further, the influential order of the frothers was found as 2-octanol > terpenic oil > MIBC. According to the flotation results, the presence of NBs increased the LIBG flotation recovery and its kinetic rate by 15% and 33%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:56:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb46dd6282fc491ebac691e56b06db81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2238-7854
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:56:11Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Materials Research and Technology
spelling doaj.art-bb46dd6282fc491ebac691e56b06db812022-12-22T03:52:48ZengElsevierJournal of Materials Research and Technology2238-78542022-09-012038913904Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphiteSabereh Nazari0Shaoqi Zhou1Ahmad Hassanzadeh2Jinlong Li3Yaqun He4Xiangning Bu5Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk6School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, ChinaSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Coal Processing and Efficient Utilization (Ministry of Education), China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, ChinaMaelgwyn Mineral Services Ltd, Ty Maelgwyn, 1A Gower Road, Cathays, Cardiff, CF24 4PA, UK; Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, NorwaySchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, ChinaSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China; Corresponding author.School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China; Key Laboratory of Coal Processing and Efficient Utilization (Ministry of Education), China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China; Corresponding author.Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7031, NorwayAlthough many studies have focused on processing of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs), there is a considerable lack of information concerning the application of nanobubbles (NBs) in their floatabilities. To cover this knowledge gap, the current study aims at exploring the effect of key operating parameters on flotation of two types of graphite i.e., lithium-ion batteries’ graphite (LIBG) and natural ore graphite (NOG) in the presence of NBs. For this purpose, the effects of NB solution ratio, impeller speed, air flow rate, as well as dosage and type of collector and frother on recovery of graphite were investigated in the presence and absence of NBs. Three frothers (i.e., methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), terpenic oil, and 2-octanol), and three collectors (i.e., n-dodecane, kerosene and diesel oil) were employed for comparison purposes using an XFG micro-flotation unit. The hydrodynamic cavitation and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods were utilized to produce and characterize ultrafine bubbles, respectively. The DLS results confirmed the bubble size distribution ranged between 180 and 400 nm. The maximum recovery of graphite particles (ca. 98%) was obtained for the LIBG particles, at an impeller speed of 1000 rpm, air flow rate of 0.4 L/min, using 2-octanol as a frother, and n-dodecane as a collector. Further, the influential order of the frothers was found as 2-octanol > terpenic oil > MIBC. According to the flotation results, the presence of NBs increased the LIBG flotation recovery and its kinetic rate by 15% and 33%, respectively.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785422013710Nano-bubble-assisted flotationGraphiteFrotherOperating parametersKinetic rate constant
spellingShingle Sabereh Nazari
Shaoqi Zhou
Ahmad Hassanzadeh
Jinlong Li
Yaqun He
Xiangning Bu
Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk
Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Nano-bubble-assisted flotation
Graphite
Frother
Operating parameters
Kinetic rate constant
title Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
title_full Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
title_fullStr Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
title_full_unstemmed Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
title_short Influence of operating parameters on nanobubble-assisted flotation of graphite
title_sort influence of operating parameters on nanobubble assisted flotation of graphite
topic Nano-bubble-assisted flotation
Graphite
Frother
Operating parameters
Kinetic rate constant
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785422013710
work_keys_str_mv AT saberehnazari influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT shaoqizhou influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT ahmadhassanzadeh influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT jinlongli influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT yaqunhe influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT xiangningbu influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite
AT przemyslawbkowalczuk influenceofoperatingparametersonnanobubbleassistedflotationofgraphite