Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives

Abstract Background Trauma-informed (TI) approach is a framework for a system change intervention that transforms the organizational culture and practices to address the high prevalence and impact of trauma on patients and healthcare professionals, and prevents re-traumatization in healthcare servic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Emsley, Joshua Smith, David Martin, Natalia V. Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08461-w
_version_ 1818020404031127552
author Elizabeth Emsley
Joshua Smith
David Martin
Natalia V. Lewis
author_facet Elizabeth Emsley
Joshua Smith
David Martin
Natalia V. Lewis
author_sort Elizabeth Emsley
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Trauma-informed (TI) approach is a framework for a system change intervention that transforms the organizational culture and practices to address the high prevalence and impact of trauma on patients and healthcare professionals, and prevents re-traumatization in healthcare services. Review of TI approaches in primary and community mental healthcare identified limited evidence for its effectiveness in the UK, however it is endorsed in various policies. This study aimed to investigate the UK-specific context through exploring how TI approaches are represented in health policies, and how they are understood and implemented by policy makers and healthcare professionals. Methods A qualitative study comprising of a document analysis of UK health policies followed by semi-structured interviews with key informants with direct experience of developing and implementing TI approaches. We used the Ready Extract Analyse Distil (READ) approach to guide policy document review, and the framework method to analyse data. Results We analysed 24 documents and interviewed 11 professionals from healthcare organizations and local authorities. TI approach was included in national, regional and local policies, however, there was no UK- or NHS-wide strategy or legislation, nor funding commitment. Although documents and interviews provided differing interpretations of TI care, they were aligned in describing the integration of TI principles at the system level, contextual tailoring to each organization, and addressing varied challenges within health systems. TI care in the UK has had piecemeal implementation, with a nation-wide strategy and leadership visible in Scotland and Wales and more disjointed implementation in England. Professionals wanted enhanced coordination between organizations and regions. We identified factors affecting implementation of TI approaches at the level of organization (leadership, service user involvement, organizational culture, resource allocation, competing priorities) and wider context (government support, funding). Professionals had conflicting views on the future of TI approaches, however all agreed that government backing is essential for implementing policies into practice. Conclusions A coordinated, more centralized strategy and provision for TI healthcare, increased funding for evaluation, and education through professional networks about evidence-based TI health systems can contribute towards evidence-informed policies and implementation of TI approaches in the UK.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T08:04:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb544ab29e5a46d19401f41335a8f33d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T08:04:26Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-bb544ab29e5a46d19401f41335a8f33d2022-12-22T02:04:47ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-09-0122111210.1186/s12913-022-08461-wTrauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectivesElizabeth Emsley0Joshua Smith1David Martin2Natalia V. Lewis3Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolCentre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of BristolAbstract Background Trauma-informed (TI) approach is a framework for a system change intervention that transforms the organizational culture and practices to address the high prevalence and impact of trauma on patients and healthcare professionals, and prevents re-traumatization in healthcare services. Review of TI approaches in primary and community mental healthcare identified limited evidence for its effectiveness in the UK, however it is endorsed in various policies. This study aimed to investigate the UK-specific context through exploring how TI approaches are represented in health policies, and how they are understood and implemented by policy makers and healthcare professionals. Methods A qualitative study comprising of a document analysis of UK health policies followed by semi-structured interviews with key informants with direct experience of developing and implementing TI approaches. We used the Ready Extract Analyse Distil (READ) approach to guide policy document review, and the framework method to analyse data. Results We analysed 24 documents and interviewed 11 professionals from healthcare organizations and local authorities. TI approach was included in national, regional and local policies, however, there was no UK- or NHS-wide strategy or legislation, nor funding commitment. Although documents and interviews provided differing interpretations of TI care, they were aligned in describing the integration of TI principles at the system level, contextual tailoring to each organization, and addressing varied challenges within health systems. TI care in the UK has had piecemeal implementation, with a nation-wide strategy and leadership visible in Scotland and Wales and more disjointed implementation in England. Professionals wanted enhanced coordination between organizations and regions. We identified factors affecting implementation of TI approaches at the level of organization (leadership, service user involvement, organizational culture, resource allocation, competing priorities) and wider context (government support, funding). Professionals had conflicting views on the future of TI approaches, however all agreed that government backing is essential for implementing policies into practice. Conclusions A coordinated, more centralized strategy and provision for TI healthcare, increased funding for evaluation, and education through professional networks about evidence-based TI health systems can contribute towards evidence-informed policies and implementation of TI approaches in the UK.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08461-wPsychological traumaMental healthPrimary health carePublic healthQualitative researchPolicy making
spellingShingle Elizabeth Emsley
Joshua Smith
David Martin
Natalia V. Lewis
Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
BMC Health Services Research
Psychological trauma
Mental health
Primary health care
Public health
Qualitative research
Policy making
title Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
title_full Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
title_fullStr Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
title_short Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? A qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
title_sort trauma informed care in the uk where are we a qualitative study of health policies and professional perspectives
topic Psychological trauma
Mental health
Primary health care
Public health
Qualitative research
Policy making
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08461-w
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethemsley traumainformedcareintheukwhereareweaqualitativestudyofhealthpoliciesandprofessionalperspectives
AT joshuasmith traumainformedcareintheukwhereareweaqualitativestudyofhealthpoliciesandprofessionalperspectives
AT davidmartin traumainformedcareintheukwhereareweaqualitativestudyofhealthpoliciesandprofessionalperspectives
AT nataliavlewis traumainformedcareintheukwhereareweaqualitativestudyofhealthpoliciesandprofessionalperspectives