On supersymmetric multipole ratios
Abstract Four-dimensional supersymmetric black holes are static and so have all vanishing multipoles (except the mass monopole). Nevertheless, it is possible to define finite multipole ratios for these black holes, by taking the ratio of (finite) multipoles of supersymmetric multicentered geometries...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)160 |
| _version_ | 1827900103103348736 |
|---|---|
| author | Bogdan Ganchev Daniel R. Mayerson |
| author_facet | Bogdan Ganchev Daniel R. Mayerson |
| author_sort | Bogdan Ganchev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Four-dimensional supersymmetric black holes are static and so have all vanishing multipoles (except the mass monopole). Nevertheless, it is possible to define finite multipole ratios for these black holes, by taking the ratio of (finite) multipoles of supersymmetric multicentered geometries and then taking the black hole scaling limit of the multipole ratios within these geometries. An alternative way to calculate these multipole ratios is to deform the supersymmetric black hole slightly into a non-extremal, rotating black hole, calculate the multipole ratios of this altered black hole, and then take the supersymmetric limit of the ratios. Bena and Mayerson observed that for a class of microstate geometries, these two a priori completely different methods give spectacular agreement for the resulting supersymmetric black hole multipole ratios. They conjectured that this agreement is due to the smallness of the entropy parameter for these black holes. We correct this conjecture and give strong evidence supporting a more refined conjecture, which is that the agreement of multipole ratios as calculated with these two different methods is due to both the microstate geometry and its corresponding black hole having a property we call “large dipole”, which can be interpreted as their center of mass being far away from its apparent center. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:26:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bb6b6b1347e0499eaa233d52d4ecd890 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1029-8479 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T23:26:29Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| spelling | doaj.art-bb6b6b1347e0499eaa233d52d4ecd8902023-07-16T11:07:42ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792023-02-012023213210.1007/JHEP02(2023)160On supersymmetric multipole ratiosBogdan Ganchev0Daniel R. Mayerson1Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Physique ThéoriqueInstituut voor Theoretische Fysica, KU LeuvenAbstract Four-dimensional supersymmetric black holes are static and so have all vanishing multipoles (except the mass monopole). Nevertheless, it is possible to define finite multipole ratios for these black holes, by taking the ratio of (finite) multipoles of supersymmetric multicentered geometries and then taking the black hole scaling limit of the multipole ratios within these geometries. An alternative way to calculate these multipole ratios is to deform the supersymmetric black hole slightly into a non-extremal, rotating black hole, calculate the multipole ratios of this altered black hole, and then take the supersymmetric limit of the ratios. Bena and Mayerson observed that for a class of microstate geometries, these two a priori completely different methods give spectacular agreement for the resulting supersymmetric black hole multipole ratios. They conjectured that this agreement is due to the smallness of the entropy parameter for these black holes. We correct this conjecture and give strong evidence supporting a more refined conjecture, which is that the agreement of multipole ratios as calculated with these two different methods is due to both the microstate geometry and its corresponding black hole having a property we call “large dipole”, which can be interpreted as their center of mass being far away from its apparent center.https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)160Black HolesBlack Holes in String TheorySupergravity Models |
| spellingShingle | Bogdan Ganchev Daniel R. Mayerson On supersymmetric multipole ratios Journal of High Energy Physics Black Holes Black Holes in String Theory Supergravity Models |
| title | On supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| title_full | On supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| title_fullStr | On supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| title_full_unstemmed | On supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| title_short | On supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| title_sort | on supersymmetric multipole ratios |
| topic | Black Holes Black Holes in String Theory Supergravity Models |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)160 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bogdanganchev onsupersymmetricmultipoleratios AT danielrmayerson onsupersymmetricmultipoleratios |