Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates
Abstract Background Common methods for confounder identification such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), hypothesis testing, or a 10 % change-in-estimate (CIE) criterion for estimated associations may not be applicable due to (a) insufficient knowledge to draw a DAG and (b) when adjustment for a tru...
Main Authors: | Paul H. Lee, Igor Burstyn |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2016-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0159-6 |
Similar Items
-
A novel method for controlling unobserved confounding using double confounders
by: Lu Liu, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Identification of confounders and estimating the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination
by: Ashagrie Sharew Iyassu, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Methodological Tutorial Series for Epidemiological Studies: Confounder Selection and Sensitivity Analyses to Unmeasured Confounding From Epidemiological and Statistical Perspectives
by: Kosuke Inoue, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Exchangeability of Measures of Association Before and After Exposure Status Is Flipped: Its Relationship With Confounding in the Counterfactual Model
by: Etsuji Suzuki, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
How authors select covariates in the multivariate analysis of cancer studies in
10 oncology journals in Korea: a descriptive study
by: Mi Ah Han, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)