A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement
Objectives: This study compares the precision of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and two-dimensional radiography for mini-implant implantation. Materials and Method: For 30 sites (in 15 patients between the ages of 13 and 26 years), the buccal interradicular region among the 2nd premolar and 1s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=927;epage=929;aulast=Ashil |
| _version_ | 1797222261177974784 |
|---|---|
| author | A M Ashil Aseem Sharma Lijo K Jose Shubhi Grover Anuraj Singh Kochar Shaji T Varghese Tanushree Sharma Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail |
| author_facet | A M Ashil Aseem Sharma Lijo K Jose Shubhi Grover Anuraj Singh Kochar Shaji T Varghese Tanushree Sharma Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail |
| author_sort | A M Ashil |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: This study compares the precision of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and two-dimensional radiography for mini-implant implantation. Materials and Method: For 30 sites (in 15 patients between the ages of 13 and 26 years), the buccal interradicular region among the 2nd premolar and 1st molar was found to be the best location for mini-implants. Next, two groups of the mini-implant implantation process were created. Mini-implants were positioned at the CBCT data-identified sites in the CBCT group. Mini-implants were inserted in the RVG group by using two-dimensional digital radiography and a specially constructed guide. To assess the precision of the mini-implant implantation, post-placement CBCT images were acquired. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Result: The two groups showed a statistically considerable variation in the mini-implant placement's departure from the optimal height. Due to the smaller interradicular space and decreased convenience in the posterior mandibular area, two out of 15 mini-implants in the RVG group demonstrated root contact in the mandibular jaw. Conclusion: The two-dimensional intraoral radiograph of the interradicular area provides sufficient information for mini-implant placement even though CBCT accurately visualizes the interradicular space in three dimensions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bb83f0bbaa8949f089ccdabaaed855b3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:31Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-bb83f0bbaa8949f089ccdabaaed855b32024-04-04T16:37:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116592792910.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1102_23A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placementA M AshilAseem SharmaLijo K JoseShubhi GroverAnuraj Singh KocharShaji T VargheseTanushree SharmaPrabu Mahin Syed IsmailObjectives: This study compares the precision of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and two-dimensional radiography for mini-implant implantation. Materials and Method: For 30 sites (in 15 patients between the ages of 13 and 26 years), the buccal interradicular region among the 2nd premolar and 1st molar was found to be the best location for mini-implants. Next, two groups of the mini-implant implantation process were created. Mini-implants were positioned at the CBCT data-identified sites in the CBCT group. Mini-implants were inserted in the RVG group by using two-dimensional digital radiography and a specially constructed guide. To assess the precision of the mini-implant implantation, post-placement CBCT images were acquired. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Result: The two groups showed a statistically considerable variation in the mini-implant placement's departure from the optimal height. Due to the smaller interradicular space and decreased convenience in the posterior mandibular area, two out of 15 mini-implants in the RVG group demonstrated root contact in the mandibular jaw. Conclusion: The two-dimensional intraoral radiograph of the interradicular area provides sufficient information for mini-implant placement even though CBCT accurately visualizes the interradicular space in three dimensions.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=927;epage=929;aulast=Ashilassessmentcbctimplantrvg |
| spellingShingle | A M Ashil Aseem Sharma Lijo K Jose Shubhi Grover Anuraj Singh Kochar Shaji T Varghese Tanushree Sharma Prabu Mahin Syed Ismail A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences assessment cbct implant rvg |
| title | A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement |
| title_full | A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement |
| title_fullStr | A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement |
| title_full_unstemmed | A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement |
| title_short | A CBCT assessment of orthodontic mini-implant placement |
| title_sort | cbct assessment of orthodontic mini implant placement |
| topic | assessment cbct implant rvg |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=927;epage=929;aulast=Ashil |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amashil acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT aseemsharma acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT lijokjose acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT shubhigrover acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT anurajsinghkochar acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT shajitvarghese acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT tanushreesharma acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT prabumahinsyedismail acbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT amashil cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT aseemsharma cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT lijokjose cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT shubhigrover cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT anurajsinghkochar cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT shajitvarghese cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT tanushreesharma cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement AT prabumahinsyedismail cbctassessmentoforthodonticminiimplantplacement |