Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau, Ana Wheelock, Tushna Vandrevala, Priscilla Harries
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2022-04-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0
_version_ 1818523685534826496
author Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
Ana Wheelock
Tushna Vandrevala
Priscilla Harries
author_facet Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
Ana Wheelock
Tushna Vandrevala
Priscilla Harries
author_sort Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:47:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb83fc2659e643a29b75a7f19581e8e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:47:53Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-bb83fc2659e643a29b75a7f19581e8e02022-12-22T01:18:55ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922022-04-01911110.1057/s41599-022-01153-0Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciencesGaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau0Ana Wheelock1Tushna Vandrevala2Priscilla Harries3Kingston Business School, Kingston UniversityKingston Business School, Kingston UniversityCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University and St. George’s, University of LondonCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University and St. George’s, University of Londonhttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0
spellingShingle Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
Ana Wheelock
Tushna Vandrevala
Priscilla Harries
Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
title_full Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
title_fullStr Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
title_full_unstemmed Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
title_short Correction: Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
title_sort correction peer reviewers dilemmas a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gaellevalleetourangeau correctionpeerreviewersdilemmasaqualitativeexplorationofdecisionalconflictintheevaluationofgrantapplicationsinthemedicalhumanitiesandsocialsciences
AT anawheelock correctionpeerreviewersdilemmasaqualitativeexplorationofdecisionalconflictintheevaluationofgrantapplicationsinthemedicalhumanitiesandsocialsciences
AT tushnavandrevala correctionpeerreviewersdilemmasaqualitativeexplorationofdecisionalconflictintheevaluationofgrantapplicationsinthemedicalhumanitiesandsocialsciences
AT priscillaharries correctionpeerreviewersdilemmasaqualitativeexplorationofdecisionalconflictintheevaluationofgrantapplicationsinthemedicalhumanitiesandsocialsciences