Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a relatively new procedure, only gaining approval in the United States in 2003. For these reasons, we sought to expand upon the breadth of current literature reporting on the long-term outcomes following this increasingly common orthopedic pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher A. White, Troy Li, Akshar V. Patel, Bradford O. Parsons, Evan L. Flatow, Paul J. Cagle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X23000826
_version_ 1797398444457852928
author Christopher A. White
Troy Li
Akshar V. Patel
Bradford O. Parsons
Evan L. Flatow
Paul J. Cagle
author_facet Christopher A. White
Troy Li
Akshar V. Patel
Bradford O. Parsons
Evan L. Flatow
Paul J. Cagle
author_sort Christopher A. White
collection DOAJ
description Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a relatively new procedure, only gaining approval in the United States in 2003. For these reasons, we sought to expand upon the breadth of current literature reporting on the long-term outcomes following this increasingly common orthopedic procedure. Case details: An institutional database was utilized to identify patients who underwent rTSA with a minimum postoperative follow-up of ten years. The five patients with the longest follow-up and complete clinical measures were ultimately included. Demographics, patient reported outcomes (Visual Analog Score (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST)), range of motion (Forward Elevation, Internal Rotation, External Rotation), and various radiographic measures were subsequently analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 11.6 ± 1.7 years. Patients saw improvements in VAS (pre-op.: 4.8 vs post-op: 3.2), ASES (pre-op.: 38.0 vs post-op: 58.0), SST (pre-op.: 2.6 vs post-op: 5.4), and Forward Elevation (pre-op.: 124° vs post-op: 142°) scores. However, internal and external rotation decreased by two vertebral levels and 14°, respectively. Only one shoulder failed during this follow-up time requiring revision surgery at 5.8 years. The overall survival was 100.0% and 80.0% at five- and ten-years follow-up, respectively, with a predicted implant survival time of 12.8 ± 1.6 years. Conclusion: Despite its relative novelty, rTSA is proving to be a sustainable procedure for patients with regards to pain, shoulder functionality, and implant survival, however, range of motion may not be completely restored. Overall, rTSA acts as a viable option for patients requiring shoulder replacement.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:25:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb85d68c37e64aad9e4a77baa0db19bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2773-157X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:25:40Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
spelling doaj.art-bb85d68c37e64aad9e4a77baa0db19bd2023-12-10T06:19:33ZengElsevierJournal of Orthopaedic Reports2773-157X2023-12-0124100210Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case seriesChristopher A. White0Troy Li1Akshar V. Patel2Bradford O. Parsons3Evan L. Flatow4Paul J. Cagle5Corresponding author. 425 West 59th Street, New York, NY, 10019, USA.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USABackground: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a relatively new procedure, only gaining approval in the United States in 2003. For these reasons, we sought to expand upon the breadth of current literature reporting on the long-term outcomes following this increasingly common orthopedic procedure. Case details: An institutional database was utilized to identify patients who underwent rTSA with a minimum postoperative follow-up of ten years. The five patients with the longest follow-up and complete clinical measures were ultimately included. Demographics, patient reported outcomes (Visual Analog Score (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST)), range of motion (Forward Elevation, Internal Rotation, External Rotation), and various radiographic measures were subsequently analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 11.6 ± 1.7 years. Patients saw improvements in VAS (pre-op.: 4.8 vs post-op: 3.2), ASES (pre-op.: 38.0 vs post-op: 58.0), SST (pre-op.: 2.6 vs post-op: 5.4), and Forward Elevation (pre-op.: 124° vs post-op: 142°) scores. However, internal and external rotation decreased by two vertebral levels and 14°, respectively. Only one shoulder failed during this follow-up time requiring revision surgery at 5.8 years. The overall survival was 100.0% and 80.0% at five- and ten-years follow-up, respectively, with a predicted implant survival time of 12.8 ± 1.6 years. Conclusion: Despite its relative novelty, rTSA is proving to be a sustainable procedure for patients with regards to pain, shoulder functionality, and implant survival, however, range of motion may not be completely restored. Overall, rTSA acts as a viable option for patients requiring shoulder replacement.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X23000826ShoulderReverseArthroplastyLong-termRange of motionPatient reported outcomes
spellingShingle Christopher A. White
Troy Li
Akshar V. Patel
Bradford O. Parsons
Evan L. Flatow
Paul J. Cagle
Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Shoulder
Reverse
Arthroplasty
Long-term
Range of motion
Patient reported outcomes
title Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
title_full Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
title_fullStr Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
title_short Outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11.6 Years follow-up: A case series
title_sort outcomes for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients at an average of 11 6 years follow up a case series
topic Shoulder
Reverse
Arthroplasty
Long-term
Range of motion
Patient reported outcomes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X23000826
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherawhite outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries
AT troyli outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries
AT aksharvpatel outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries
AT bradfordoparsons outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries
AT evanlflatow outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries
AT pauljcagle outcomesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastypatientsatanaverageof116yearsfollowupacaseseries