How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation

This study examined age-related differences in sequential conflict modulation (SCM), elicited in three tasks requiring the inhibition of pre-potent responses; a Simon task, an S-R compatibility (SRC) task and a hybrid Choice-reaction/NoGo task. The primary focus was on age-related changes in perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvan F. A. Smulders, Eric L. L. Soetens, Maurits W. van der Molen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00766/full
_version_ 1818584751672393728
author Silvan F. A. Smulders
Eric L. L. Soetens
Maurits W. van der Molen
author_facet Silvan F. A. Smulders
Eric L. L. Soetens
Maurits W. van der Molen
author_sort Silvan F. A. Smulders
collection DOAJ
description This study examined age-related differences in sequential conflict modulation (SCM), elicited in three tasks requiring the inhibition of pre-potent responses; a Simon task, an S-R compatibility (SRC) task and a hybrid Choice-reaction/NoGo task. The primary focus was on age-related changes in performance changes following a conflict trial. A secondary aim was to assess whether SCM follows different developmental trajectories depending on the type of conflict elicited by the tasks. The tasks were presented to three different groups of participants with an age range between 7- to 25-years—one group of participants for each task. For each task, the response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) was manipulated (50 vs. 500 ms) across trial blocks to assess time-dependent changes in conflict modulation. The results showed SCM for all three tasks, although the specific patterns differed between tasks and RSIs. Importantly, the magnitude of SCM decreased with advancing age, but this developmental trend did not survive when considering age-group differences in basic response speed. The current results contribute to the emerging evidence suggesting that patterns of SCM are task specific and were interpreted in terms of multiple bottom-up control mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:26:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb87425528ee4e78b276974174a4e9a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:26:09Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-bb87425528ee4e78b276974174a4e9a02022-12-21T22:37:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-05-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00766333327How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict ModulationSilvan F. A. Smulders0Eric L. L. Soetens1Maurits W. van der Molen2Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsThis study examined age-related differences in sequential conflict modulation (SCM), elicited in three tasks requiring the inhibition of pre-potent responses; a Simon task, an S-R compatibility (SRC) task and a hybrid Choice-reaction/NoGo task. The primary focus was on age-related changes in performance changes following a conflict trial. A secondary aim was to assess whether SCM follows different developmental trajectories depending on the type of conflict elicited by the tasks. The tasks were presented to three different groups of participants with an age range between 7- to 25-years—one group of participants for each task. For each task, the response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) was manipulated (50 vs. 500 ms) across trial blocks to assess time-dependent changes in conflict modulation. The results showed SCM for all three tasks, although the specific patterns differed between tasks and RSIs. Importantly, the magnitude of SCM decreased with advancing age, but this developmental trend did not survive when considering age-group differences in basic response speed. The current results contribute to the emerging evidence suggesting that patterns of SCM are task specific and were interpreted in terms of multiple bottom-up control mechanisms.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00766/fullsequential conflict modulationconflict adaptationSimon taskS-R compatibility taskhybrid choice reaction/NoGo taskdevelopment
spellingShingle Silvan F. A. Smulders
Eric L. L. Soetens
Maurits W. van der Molen
How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
Frontiers in Psychology
sequential conflict modulation
conflict adaptation
Simon task
S-R compatibility task
hybrid choice reaction/NoGo task
development
title How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
title_full How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
title_fullStr How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
title_full_unstemmed How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
title_short How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
title_sort how do children deal with conflict a developmental study of sequential conflict modulation
topic sequential conflict modulation
conflict adaptation
Simon task
S-R compatibility task
hybrid choice reaction/NoGo task
development
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00766/full
work_keys_str_mv AT silvanfasmulders howdochildrendealwithconflictadevelopmentalstudyofsequentialconflictmodulation
AT ericllsoetens howdochildrendealwithconflictadevelopmentalstudyofsequentialconflictmodulation
AT mauritswvandermolen howdochildrendealwithconflictadevelopmentalstudyofsequentialconflictmodulation