Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries

In this paper, a bi-directional-buck-boost-converter-based active equalizer is developed. The energy between adjacent cells can be transferred bi-directionally by manipulating the balancing current to solve the unbalanced problem in a battery module. It is noted that the conduction time of the main...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zong-Zhen Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/14/2219
_version_ 1797439867807858688
author Zong-Zhen Yang
author_facet Zong-Zhen Yang
author_sort Zong-Zhen Yang
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, a bi-directional-buck-boost-converter-based active equalizer is developed. The energy between adjacent cells can be transferred bi-directionally by manipulating the balancing current to solve the unbalanced problem in a battery module. It is noted that the conduction time of the main switch in the conventional buck-boost equalizer is fixed. Thus, the balancing current will diminish as the voltage difference of the adjacent cells decreases, which results in a prolonged equilibrium period. This paper has proposed two methods, namely, the varied-on-time (VOT) method and the voltage ratio modulation (VRM) method, to shorten the equilibrium period. In the VOT method, the conduction time of the main switch is determined according to high state-of-charge (SOC) cell voltage. In this way, the balancing current is able to be kept at the desired level rather than reduced during the balancing process. On the other hand, the VRM method computes the proportion of the conduction time and the cut-off time in a switching cycle based on the voltages of adjacent cells. Hence, the equalizer can deliver the maximum energy in a switching period and shorten the equilibrium period. The simulation platform and experiments with four batteries connected in serial are carried out to verify the proposed control methods. According to the experimental results, the VOT method saves 10.3%, 11.7%, and 16% of the equilibrium time compared with the fixed duty cycle (FDC) method. The VRM method can shorten 35.9%, 36.6%, and 37.3% of the equilibrium time compared with the FDC method.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:58:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bb8e2f92871347afbbe8627bf9335af3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:58:56Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-bb8e2f92871347afbbe8627bf9335af32023-11-30T23:06:12ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922022-07-011114221910.3390/electronics11142219Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion BatteriesZong-Zhen Yang0Department of Electrical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84, Gungjuan Road, Taishan District, New Taipei City 24301, TaiwanIn this paper, a bi-directional-buck-boost-converter-based active equalizer is developed. The energy between adjacent cells can be transferred bi-directionally by manipulating the balancing current to solve the unbalanced problem in a battery module. It is noted that the conduction time of the main switch in the conventional buck-boost equalizer is fixed. Thus, the balancing current will diminish as the voltage difference of the adjacent cells decreases, which results in a prolonged equilibrium period. This paper has proposed two methods, namely, the varied-on-time (VOT) method and the voltage ratio modulation (VRM) method, to shorten the equilibrium period. In the VOT method, the conduction time of the main switch is determined according to high state-of-charge (SOC) cell voltage. In this way, the balancing current is able to be kept at the desired level rather than reduced during the balancing process. On the other hand, the VRM method computes the proportion of the conduction time and the cut-off time in a switching cycle based on the voltages of adjacent cells. Hence, the equalizer can deliver the maximum energy in a switching period and shorten the equilibrium period. The simulation platform and experiments with four batteries connected in serial are carried out to verify the proposed control methods. According to the experimental results, the VOT method saves 10.3%, 11.7%, and 16% of the equilibrium time compared with the fixed duty cycle (FDC) method. The VRM method can shorten 35.9%, 36.6%, and 37.3% of the equilibrium time compared with the FDC method.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/14/2219active equalizerbi-directional buck-boost convertervaried-on-time methodvoltage ratio modulation method
spellingShingle Zong-Zhen Yang
Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Electronics
active equalizer
bi-directional buck-boost converter
varied-on-time method
voltage ratio modulation method
title Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
title_full Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
title_fullStr Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
title_full_unstemmed Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
title_short Development of an Active Equalizer for Lithium-Ion Batteries
title_sort development of an active equalizer for lithium ion batteries
topic active equalizer
bi-directional buck-boost converter
varied-on-time method
voltage ratio modulation method
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/14/2219
work_keys_str_mv AT zongzhenyang developmentofanactiveequalizerforlithiumionbatteries