Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis

Meso-scale watershed management (1-10,000 km2) is receiving growing attention as the spatial scale where policy in integrated water resource management (IWRM) goes into operational mode. This is also where aggregated field-level agricultural water management (AWM) interventions may result in externa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennie Barron, Stacey Noel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2011-06-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/Vol4/v4issue2/136-a4-2-3/file
_version_ 1818024101582733312
author Jennie Barron
Stacey Noel
author_facet Jennie Barron
Stacey Noel
author_sort Jennie Barron
collection DOAJ
description Meso-scale watershed management (1-10,000 km2) is receiving growing attention as the spatial scale where policy in integrated water resource management (IWRM) goes into operational mode. This is also where aggregated field-level agricultural water management (AWM) interventions may result in externalities. But there is little synthesised 'lessons learned' on the costs and benefits of interventions at this scale. Here we synthesise selected cases and meta-analyses on the investment cost in 'soft components' accompanying AWM interventions. The focus is on meso-scale watersheds in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. We found very few cases with benefit-to-cost evaluation at full project level, or separate costing of hard and soft components. The synthesis suggests higher development success rates in communities with an initial level of social capital, where projects were implemented with cost- and knowledge-sharing between involved stakeholders, and where one or more 'agents of change' were present to facilitate leadership and communications. There is a need to monitor and evaluate both the external and the internal gains and losses in a more systematic manner to help development agents and other investors to ensure wiser and more effective investments in AWM interventions and watershed management.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T03:54:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bba17bfb68de4b3d8d6d38306b7fdd66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T03:54:52Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher Water Alternatives Association
record_format Article
series Water Alternatives
spelling doaj.art-bba17bfb68de4b3d8d6d38306b7fdd662022-12-22T02:03:10ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752011-06-0142145154Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and SynthesisJennie Barron0Stacey Noel1Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, UK; and Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SwedenStockholm Environment Institute, University of Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaMeso-scale watershed management (1-10,000 km2) is receiving growing attention as the spatial scale where policy in integrated water resource management (IWRM) goes into operational mode. This is also where aggregated field-level agricultural water management (AWM) interventions may result in externalities. But there is little synthesised 'lessons learned' on the costs and benefits of interventions at this scale. Here we synthesise selected cases and meta-analyses on the investment cost in 'soft components' accompanying AWM interventions. The focus is on meso-scale watersheds in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. We found very few cases with benefit-to-cost evaluation at full project level, or separate costing of hard and soft components. The synthesis suggests higher development success rates in communities with an initial level of social capital, where projects were implemented with cost- and knowledge-sharing between involved stakeholders, and where one or more 'agents of change' were present to facilitate leadership and communications. There is a need to monitor and evaluate both the external and the internal gains and losses in a more systematic manner to help development agents and other investors to ensure wiser and more effective investments in AWM interventions and watershed management.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/Vol4/v4issue2/136-a4-2-3/fileMeso-scale watershedsagricultural water managementinvestmentcost benefitsocial capital
spellingShingle Jennie Barron
Stacey Noel
Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
Water Alternatives
Meso-scale watersheds
agricultural water management
investment
cost benefit
social capital
title Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
title_full Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
title_fullStr Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
title_short Valuing Soft Components in Agricultural Water Management Interventions in Meso-Scale Watersheds: A Review and Synthesis
title_sort valuing soft components in agricultural water management interventions in meso scale watersheds a review and synthesis
topic Meso-scale watersheds
agricultural water management
investment
cost benefit
social capital
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/Vol4/v4issue2/136-a4-2-3/file
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniebarron valuingsoftcomponentsinagriculturalwatermanagementinterventionsinmesoscalewatershedsareviewandsynthesis
AT staceynoel valuingsoftcomponentsinagriculturalwatermanagementinterventionsinmesoscalewatershedsareviewandsynthesis