The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data
Determining the spatial distribution and temporal development of evaporation at regional and global scales is required to improve our understanding of the coupled water and energy cycles and to better monitor any changes in observed trends and variability of linked hydrological processes. With recen...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
| Online Access: | http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/283/2016/gmd-9-283-2016.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811257402743324672 |
|---|---|
| author | M. F. McCabe A. Ershadi C. Jimenez D. G. Miralles D. Michel E. F. Wood |
| author_facet | M. F. McCabe A. Ershadi C. Jimenez D. G. Miralles D. Michel E. F. Wood |
| author_sort | M. F. McCabe |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Determining the spatial distribution and temporal development of evaporation
at regional and global scales is required to improve our understanding of
the coupled water and energy cycles and to better monitor any changes in
observed trends and variability of linked hydrological processes. With
recent international efforts guiding the development of long-term and
globally distributed flux estimates, continued product assessments are
required to inform upon the selection of suitable model structures and also
to establish the appropriateness of these multi-model simulations for global
application. In support of the objectives of the Global Energy and Water Cycle Exchanges (GEWEX) LandFlux project,
four commonly used evaporation models are evaluated against data from
tower-based eddy-covariance observations, distributed across a range of
biomes and climate zones. The selected schemes include the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) approach, the Priestley–Taylor Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (PT-JPL) model, the Penman–Monteith-based Mu model (PM-Mu) and
the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM). Here we seek to examine
the fidelity of global evaporation simulations by examining the multi-model
response to varying sources of forcing data. To do this, we perform parallel
and collocated model simulations using tower-based data together with a
global-scale grid-based forcing product. Through quantifying the multi-model
response to high-quality tower data, a better understanding of the
subsequent model response to the coarse-scale globally gridded data that
underlies the LandFlux product can be obtained, while also providing a
relative evaluation and assessment of model performance.
<br><br>
Using surface flux observations from 45 globally distributed
eddy-covariance stations as independent metrics of performance, the
tower-based analysis indicated that PT-JPL provided the highest overall
statistical performance (0.72; 61 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.65), followed closely by GLEAM (0.68; 64 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.62), with
values in parentheses representing the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, RMSD and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency
(NSE), respectively. PM-Mu (0.51; 78 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.45) tended to underestimate fluxes, while SEBS
(0.72; 101 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.24) overestimated values relative to observations. A focused analysis
across specific biome types and climate zones showed considerable
variability in the performance of all models, with no single model
consistently able to outperform any other. Results also indicated that the
global gridded data tended to reduce the performance for all of the studied
models when compared to the tower data, likely a response to scale mismatch
and issues related to forcing quality. Rather than relying on any single
model simulation, the spatial and temporal variability at both the tower-
and grid-scale highlighted the potential benefits of developing an ensemble
or blended evaporation product for global-scale LandFlux applications.
Challenges related to the robust assessment of the LandFlux product are also
discussed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:56:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bbb64e00a04e4f60acc799518c34365a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1991-959X 1991-9603 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:56:54Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Geoscientific Model Development |
| spelling | doaj.art-bbb64e00a04e4f60acc799518c34365a2022-12-22T03:22:20ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032016-01-019128330510.5194/gmd-9-283-2016The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing dataM. F. McCabe0A. Ershadi1C. Jimenez2D. G. Miralles3D. Michel4E. F. Wood5Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi ArabiaDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi ArabiaEstellus, Paris, FranceDepartment of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USADetermining the spatial distribution and temporal development of evaporation at regional and global scales is required to improve our understanding of the coupled water and energy cycles and to better monitor any changes in observed trends and variability of linked hydrological processes. With recent international efforts guiding the development of long-term and globally distributed flux estimates, continued product assessments are required to inform upon the selection of suitable model structures and also to establish the appropriateness of these multi-model simulations for global application. In support of the objectives of the Global Energy and Water Cycle Exchanges (GEWEX) LandFlux project, four commonly used evaporation models are evaluated against data from tower-based eddy-covariance observations, distributed across a range of biomes and climate zones. The selected schemes include the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) approach, the Priestley–Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL) model, the Penman–Monteith-based Mu model (PM-Mu) and the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM). Here we seek to examine the fidelity of global evaporation simulations by examining the multi-model response to varying sources of forcing data. To do this, we perform parallel and collocated model simulations using tower-based data together with a global-scale grid-based forcing product. Through quantifying the multi-model response to high-quality tower data, a better understanding of the subsequent model response to the coarse-scale globally gridded data that underlies the LandFlux product can be obtained, while also providing a relative evaluation and assessment of model performance. <br><br> Using surface flux observations from 45 globally distributed eddy-covariance stations as independent metrics of performance, the tower-based analysis indicated that PT-JPL provided the highest overall statistical performance (0.72; 61 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.65), followed closely by GLEAM (0.68; 64 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.62), with values in parentheses representing the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, RMSD and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), respectively. PM-Mu (0.51; 78 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.45) tended to underestimate fluxes, while SEBS (0.72; 101 W m<sup>−2</sup>; 0.24) overestimated values relative to observations. A focused analysis across specific biome types and climate zones showed considerable variability in the performance of all models, with no single model consistently able to outperform any other. Results also indicated that the global gridded data tended to reduce the performance for all of the studied models when compared to the tower data, likely a response to scale mismatch and issues related to forcing quality. Rather than relying on any single model simulation, the spatial and temporal variability at both the tower- and grid-scale highlighted the potential benefits of developing an ensemble or blended evaporation product for global-scale LandFlux applications. Challenges related to the robust assessment of the LandFlux product are also discussed.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/283/2016/gmd-9-283-2016.pdf |
| spellingShingle | M. F. McCabe A. Ershadi C. Jimenez D. G. Miralles D. Michel E. F. Wood The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data Geoscientific Model Development |
| title | The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data |
| title_full | The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data |
| title_fullStr | The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data |
| title_full_unstemmed | The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data |
| title_short | The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data |
| title_sort | gewex landflux project evaluation of model evaporation using tower based and globally gridded forcing data |
| url | http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/283/2016/gmd-9-283-2016.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mfmccabe thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT aershadi thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT cjimenez thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT dgmiralles thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT dmichel thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT efwood thegewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT mfmccabe gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT aershadi gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT cjimenez gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT dgmiralles gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT dmichel gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata AT efwood gewexlandfluxprojectevaluationofmodelevaporationusingtowerbasedandgloballygriddedforcingdata |