Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate
Two theories that have drawn particular attention in international politics, especially to explain global post-Cold War developments, are those of Huntington’s (1993) Clash of civilizations and Fukuyama’s (1992) The end of history and the last man. There is a great deal of literature on the mutuall...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of the Free State
2014-04-01
|
| Series: | Acta Academica |
| Online Access: | http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/1441 |
| _version_ | 1797258238912102400 |
|---|---|
| author | Costa Georghiou |
| author_facet | Costa Georghiou |
| author_sort | Costa Georghiou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Two theories that have drawn particular attention in international politics, especially to explain global post-Cold War developments, are those of Huntington’s (1993) Clash of civilizations and Fukuyama’s (1992) The end of history and the last man. There is a great deal of literature on the mutually contradictory views of these two authors; however, the literature hardly mentions the actual unexpected areas of convergence between these two theorists, which this article aims to draw out. Four pertinent questions addressed by Huntington and Fukuyama are considered,
namely the universality of Western civilisation; the role of the state; modernisation versus Westernisation, and worldwide acceptance or rejection of liberal democracy, as they relate specifically to the central aim of this article. It is precisely because of their differences, that these two distinct theories are now presenting themselves as alternatives in international relations: one can either see the world to be developing toward its final liberal democratic destination, or, alternatively on a multi-polar, civilisation-divergent course. As the search for a single paradigm within debates on
international relations continues, a convergence between two major theories, such as these, is important, as they provide one more step toward consensus between opposing views on international political developments.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:50:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bbb71bc1b96144509d045b9369be84ab |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0587-2405 2415-0479 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:50:22Z |
| publishDate | 2014-04-01 |
| publisher | University of the Free State |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Academica |
| spelling | doaj.art-bbb71bc1b96144509d045b9369be84ab2024-03-18T11:05:12ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Academica0587-24052415-04792014-04-0146210.38140/aa.v46i2.1441Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debateCosta Georghiou0University of Johannesburg Two theories that have drawn particular attention in international politics, especially to explain global post-Cold War developments, are those of Huntington’s (1993) Clash of civilizations and Fukuyama’s (1992) The end of history and the last man. There is a great deal of literature on the mutually contradictory views of these two authors; however, the literature hardly mentions the actual unexpected areas of convergence between these two theorists, which this article aims to draw out. Four pertinent questions addressed by Huntington and Fukuyama are considered, namely the universality of Western civilisation; the role of the state; modernisation versus Westernisation, and worldwide acceptance or rejection of liberal democracy, as they relate specifically to the central aim of this article. It is precisely because of their differences, that these two distinct theories are now presenting themselves as alternatives in international relations: one can either see the world to be developing toward its final liberal democratic destination, or, alternatively on a multi-polar, civilisation-divergent course. As the search for a single paradigm within debates on international relations continues, a convergence between two major theories, such as these, is important, as they provide one more step toward consensus between opposing views on international political developments. http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/1441 |
| spellingShingle | Costa Georghiou Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate Acta Academica |
| title | Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate |
| title_full | Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate |
| title_fullStr | Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate |
| title_short | Unexpected convergence: the Huntington/Fukuyama debate |
| title_sort | unexpected convergence the huntington fukuyama debate |
| url | http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/1441 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT costageorghiou unexpectedconvergencethehuntingtonfukuyamadebate |