Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi
Abstract Background Agri-innovations are mostly delivered to farmers through private and public sector-led institutions around the world, with various degrees of success in Malawi. These distribution systems, on the other hand, do not meet everyone's production and productivity needs, particula...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Agriculture & Food Security |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4 |
| _version_ | 1828186576930209792 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrick Okori Wills Munthali Harry Msere Harvey Charlie Soka Chitaya Felix Sichali Ethel Chilumpha Teddie Chirwa Anitha Seetha Betty Chinyamuyamu Emmanuel Monyo Moses Siambi Rowland Chirwa |
| author_facet | Patrick Okori Wills Munthali Harry Msere Harvey Charlie Soka Chitaya Felix Sichali Ethel Chilumpha Teddie Chirwa Anitha Seetha Betty Chinyamuyamu Emmanuel Monyo Moses Siambi Rowland Chirwa |
| author_sort | Patrick Okori |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Agri-innovations are mostly delivered to farmers through private and public sector-led institutions around the world, with various degrees of success in Malawi. These distribution systems, on the other hand, do not meet everyone's production and productivity needs, particularly those of smallholder farmers. Alternative gap-filling systems are therefore required. Over the course of 7 years, we performed two studies in Malawi to assess the efficiency of integrated farmer led agri-innovation delivery mechanisms, in order to advise programming and delivery improvements. The first study looked at the impact of farmer-led technology delivery on agricultural output and productivity. It was split into two phases: learning (2010–2015) and scaling-out (2016–2019). The second study looked at how smallholder farmers changed their behaviour, after receiving instruction during the scaling-out phase. A farmer-led social network, community seed banks, was used as the research platform. Results The number of farmers who had access to improved seed increased by 35-fold from 2.4% in the baseline year. Groundnut, the major study crop, had a 1.8-fold increase in productivity. In sorghum, and common bean, the difference in grain yield between beneficiaries and control populations was 19% and 30%, respectively. The lowest aflatoxin contamination was found in groundnut grain samples from trained farmers, showing that learning had occurred, with three training sessions sufficient for initiating and sustaining adoption of agri-innovations. Conclusions Many developing country economies have limited investments in agricultural extension and advisory services, and as well as inefficient agri-input delivery systems, limiting access to science solutions needed to boost productivity. The farmer-led technology and knowledge dissemination systems examined in this research, are appropriate for a variety farming contexts, especially for crops underinvested by private sector, and where public extension and advisory services are poorly funded. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:20:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bbbac8d3c8dc483484b3506336d2dde9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2048-7010 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:20:49Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agriculture & Food Security |
| spelling | doaj.art-bbbac8d3c8dc483484b3506336d2dde92022-12-22T03:42:20ZengBMCAgriculture & Food Security2048-70102022-07-0111111410.1186/s40066-022-00375-4Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from MalawiPatrick Okori0Wills Munthali1Harry Msere2Harvey Charlie3Soka Chitaya4Felix Sichali5Ethel Chilumpha6Teddie Chirwa7Anitha Seetha8Betty Chinyamuyamu9Emmanuel Monyo10Moses Siambi11Rowland Chirwa12International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)National Smallholder Farmers’ Association of Malawi (NASFAM)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)Abstract Background Agri-innovations are mostly delivered to farmers through private and public sector-led institutions around the world, with various degrees of success in Malawi. These distribution systems, on the other hand, do not meet everyone's production and productivity needs, particularly those of smallholder farmers. Alternative gap-filling systems are therefore required. Over the course of 7 years, we performed two studies in Malawi to assess the efficiency of integrated farmer led agri-innovation delivery mechanisms, in order to advise programming and delivery improvements. The first study looked at the impact of farmer-led technology delivery on agricultural output and productivity. It was split into two phases: learning (2010–2015) and scaling-out (2016–2019). The second study looked at how smallholder farmers changed their behaviour, after receiving instruction during the scaling-out phase. A farmer-led social network, community seed banks, was used as the research platform. Results The number of farmers who had access to improved seed increased by 35-fold from 2.4% in the baseline year. Groundnut, the major study crop, had a 1.8-fold increase in productivity. In sorghum, and common bean, the difference in grain yield between beneficiaries and control populations was 19% and 30%, respectively. The lowest aflatoxin contamination was found in groundnut grain samples from trained farmers, showing that learning had occurred, with three training sessions sufficient for initiating and sustaining adoption of agri-innovations. Conclusions Many developing country economies have limited investments in agricultural extension and advisory services, and as well as inefficient agri-input delivery systems, limiting access to science solutions needed to boost productivity. The farmer-led technology and knowledge dissemination systems examined in this research, are appropriate for a variety farming contexts, especially for crops underinvested by private sector, and where public extension and advisory services are poorly funded.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4Agri-innovationsCerealsExtension-serviceFarmer ledKnowledgeLegumes |
| spellingShingle | Patrick Okori Wills Munthali Harry Msere Harvey Charlie Soka Chitaya Felix Sichali Ethel Chilumpha Teddie Chirwa Anitha Seetha Betty Chinyamuyamu Emmanuel Monyo Moses Siambi Rowland Chirwa Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi Agriculture & Food Security Agri-innovations Cereals Extension-service Farmer led Knowledge Legumes |
| title | Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi |
| title_full | Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi |
| title_fullStr | Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi |
| title_full_unstemmed | Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi |
| title_short | Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi |
| title_sort | improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer to farmer extension experiences from malawi |
| topic | Agri-innovations Cereals Extension-service Farmer led Knowledge Legumes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patrickokori improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT willsmunthali improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT harrymsere improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT harveycharlie improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT sokachitaya improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT felixsichali improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT ethelchilumpha improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT teddiechirwa improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT anithaseetha improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT bettychinyamuyamu improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT emmanuelmonyo improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT mosessiambi improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi AT rowlandchirwa improvingefficiencyofknowledgeandtechnologydiffusionusingcommunityseedbanksandfarmertofarmerextensionexperiencesfrommalawi |