Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge

Background: The rising number of novel pathogens threatening the human population has motivated the application of mathematical modeling for forecasting the trajectory and size of epidemics. Materials and methods: We summarize the real-time forecasting results of the logistic equation during the 201...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce Pell, Yang Kuang, Cecile Viboud, Gerardo Chowell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-03-01
Series:Epidemics
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436516300433
_version_ 1811284082326241280
author Bruce Pell
Yang Kuang
Cecile Viboud
Gerardo Chowell
author_facet Bruce Pell
Yang Kuang
Cecile Viboud
Gerardo Chowell
author_sort Bruce Pell
collection DOAJ
description Background: The rising number of novel pathogens threatening the human population has motivated the application of mathematical modeling for forecasting the trajectory and size of epidemics. Materials and methods: We summarize the real-time forecasting results of the logistic equation during the 2015 Ebola challenge focused on predicting synthetic data derived from a detailed individual-based model of Ebola transmission dynamics and control. We also carry out a post-challenge comparison of two simple phenomenological models. In particular, we systematically compare the logistic growth model and a recently introduced generalized Richards model (GRM) that captures a range of early epidemic growth profiles ranging from sub-exponential to exponential growth. Specifically, we assess the performance of each model for estimating the reproduction number, generate short-term forecasts of the epidemic trajectory, and predict the final epidemic size. Results: During the challenge the logistic equation consistently underestimated the final epidemic size, peak timing and the number of cases at peak timing with an average mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.49, 0.36 and 0.40, respectively. Post-challenge, the GRM which has the flexibility to reproduce a range of epidemic growth profiles ranging from early sub-exponential to exponential growth dynamics outperformed the logistic growth model in ascertaining the final epidemic size as more incidence data was made available, while the logistic model underestimated the final epidemic even with an increasing amount of data of the evolving epidemic. Incidence forecasts provided by the generalized Richards model performed better across all scenarios and time points than the logistic growth model with mean RMS decreasing from 78.00 (logistic) to 60.80 (GRM). Both models provided reasonable predictions of the effective reproduction number, but the GRM slightly outperformed the logistic growth model with a MAPE of 0.08 compared to 0.10, averaged across all scenarios and time points. Conclusions: Our findings further support the consideration of transmission models that incorporate flexible early epidemic growth profiles in the forecasting toolkit. Such models are particularly useful for quickly evaluating a developing infectious disease outbreak using only case incidence time series of the early phase of an infectious disease outbreak. Keywords: Logistic growth model, Richards model, Generalized Richards model, Ebola challenge
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:23:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bbbd625a7ee94549a9efbe9ec1c842e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1755-4365
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:23:16Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Epidemics
spelling doaj.art-bbbd625a7ee94549a9efbe9ec1c842e62022-12-22T03:06:53ZengElsevierEpidemics1755-43652018-03-01226270Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challengeBruce Pell0Yang Kuang1Cecile Viboud2Gerardo Chowell3School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, AZ, USA; Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, St. Olaf College, MN, USA; Corresponding author at: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, AZ, USADivision of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USASchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USABackground: The rising number of novel pathogens threatening the human population has motivated the application of mathematical modeling for forecasting the trajectory and size of epidemics. Materials and methods: We summarize the real-time forecasting results of the logistic equation during the 2015 Ebola challenge focused on predicting synthetic data derived from a detailed individual-based model of Ebola transmission dynamics and control. We also carry out a post-challenge comparison of two simple phenomenological models. In particular, we systematically compare the logistic growth model and a recently introduced generalized Richards model (GRM) that captures a range of early epidemic growth profiles ranging from sub-exponential to exponential growth. Specifically, we assess the performance of each model for estimating the reproduction number, generate short-term forecasts of the epidemic trajectory, and predict the final epidemic size. Results: During the challenge the logistic equation consistently underestimated the final epidemic size, peak timing and the number of cases at peak timing with an average mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.49, 0.36 and 0.40, respectively. Post-challenge, the GRM which has the flexibility to reproduce a range of epidemic growth profiles ranging from early sub-exponential to exponential growth dynamics outperformed the logistic growth model in ascertaining the final epidemic size as more incidence data was made available, while the logistic model underestimated the final epidemic even with an increasing amount of data of the evolving epidemic. Incidence forecasts provided by the generalized Richards model performed better across all scenarios and time points than the logistic growth model with mean RMS decreasing from 78.00 (logistic) to 60.80 (GRM). Both models provided reasonable predictions of the effective reproduction number, but the GRM slightly outperformed the logistic growth model with a MAPE of 0.08 compared to 0.10, averaged across all scenarios and time points. Conclusions: Our findings further support the consideration of transmission models that incorporate flexible early epidemic growth profiles in the forecasting toolkit. Such models are particularly useful for quickly evaluating a developing infectious disease outbreak using only case incidence time series of the early phase of an infectious disease outbreak. Keywords: Logistic growth model, Richards model, Generalized Richards model, Ebola challengehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436516300433
spellingShingle Bruce Pell
Yang Kuang
Cecile Viboud
Gerardo Chowell
Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
Epidemics
title Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
title_full Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
title_fullStr Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
title_full_unstemmed Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
title_short Using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 Ebola challenge
title_sort using phenomenological models for forecasting the 2015 ebola challenge
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436516300433
work_keys_str_mv AT brucepell usingphenomenologicalmodelsforforecastingthe2015ebolachallenge
AT yangkuang usingphenomenologicalmodelsforforecastingthe2015ebolachallenge
AT cecileviboud usingphenomenologicalmodelsforforecastingthe2015ebolachallenge
AT gerardochowell usingphenomenologicalmodelsforforecastingthe2015ebolachallenge