Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity

Abstract Studies of the impacts of solar geoengineering have mostly ignored tropospheric chemistry. By decreasing the sunlight reaching Earth's surface, geoengineering may help mitigate anthropogenic climate change, but changing sunlight also alters the rates of chemical reactions throughout th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan M. Moch, Loretta J. Mickley, Sebastian D. Eastham, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Viral Shah, Jonathan J. Buonocore, Jacky Y. S. Pang, Mehliyar Sadiq, Amos P. K. Tai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Series:AGU Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000911
_version_ 1797649174969188352
author Jonathan M. Moch
Loretta J. Mickley
Sebastian D. Eastham
Elizabeth W. Lundgren
Viral Shah
Jonathan J. Buonocore
Jacky Y. S. Pang
Mehliyar Sadiq
Amos P. K. Tai
author_facet Jonathan M. Moch
Loretta J. Mickley
Sebastian D. Eastham
Elizabeth W. Lundgren
Viral Shah
Jonathan J. Buonocore
Jacky Y. S. Pang
Mehliyar Sadiq
Amos P. K. Tai
author_sort Jonathan M. Moch
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Studies of the impacts of solar geoengineering have mostly ignored tropospheric chemistry. By decreasing the sunlight reaching Earth's surface, geoengineering may help mitigate anthropogenic climate change, but changing sunlight also alters the rates of chemical reactions throughout the troposphere. Using the GEOS‐Chem atmospheric chemistry model, we show that stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) with sulfate, a frequently studied solar geoengineering method, can perturb tropospheric composition over a span of 10 years, increasing tropospheric oxidative capacity by 9% and reducing methane lifetime. SAI decreases the overall flux of shortwave radiation into the troposphere, but increases flux at certain UV wavelengths due to stratospheric ozone depletion. These radiative changes, in turn, perturb tropospheric photochemistry, driving chemical feedbacks that can substantially influence the seasonal and spatial patterns of radiative forcing beyond what is caused by enhanced stratospheric aerosol concentrations alone. For example, chemical feedbacks decrease the radiative effectiveness of geoengineering in northern high latitude summer by 20%. Atmospheric chemical feedbacks also imply the potential for net global public health benefits associated with stratospheric ozone depletion, as the decreases in mortality resulting from SAI‐induced improvements in air quality outweigh the increases in mortality due to increased UV radiation exposure. Such chemical feedbacks also lead to improved plant growth. Our results show the importance of including fuller representations of atmospheric chemistry in studies of solar geoengineering and underscore the risk of surprises from this technology that could carry unexpected consequences for Earth's climate, the biosphere, and human health.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:42:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bbc6c6227d784fc680073b73b6f8026e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2576-604X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:42:29Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series AGU Advances
spelling doaj.art-bbc6c6227d784fc680073b73b6f8026e2023-10-26T11:48:29ZengWileyAGU Advances2576-604X2023-10-0145n/an/a10.1029/2023AV000911Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative CapacityJonathan M. Moch0Loretta J. Mickley1Sebastian D. Eastham2Elizabeth W. Lundgren3Viral Shah4Jonathan J. Buonocore5Jacky Y. S. Pang6Mehliyar Sadiq7Amos P. K. Tai8John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USAJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USALaboratory for Aviation and the Environment Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USAJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USAJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USACenter for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University Boston MA USAInstitute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability The Chinese University of Hong Kong Sha Tin Hong KongInstitute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability The Chinese University of Hong Kong Sha Tin Hong KongInstitute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability The Chinese University of Hong Kong Sha Tin Hong KongAbstract Studies of the impacts of solar geoengineering have mostly ignored tropospheric chemistry. By decreasing the sunlight reaching Earth's surface, geoengineering may help mitigate anthropogenic climate change, but changing sunlight also alters the rates of chemical reactions throughout the troposphere. Using the GEOS‐Chem atmospheric chemistry model, we show that stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) with sulfate, a frequently studied solar geoengineering method, can perturb tropospheric composition over a span of 10 years, increasing tropospheric oxidative capacity by 9% and reducing methane lifetime. SAI decreases the overall flux of shortwave radiation into the troposphere, but increases flux at certain UV wavelengths due to stratospheric ozone depletion. These radiative changes, in turn, perturb tropospheric photochemistry, driving chemical feedbacks that can substantially influence the seasonal and spatial patterns of radiative forcing beyond what is caused by enhanced stratospheric aerosol concentrations alone. For example, chemical feedbacks decrease the radiative effectiveness of geoengineering in northern high latitude summer by 20%. Atmospheric chemical feedbacks also imply the potential for net global public health benefits associated with stratospheric ozone depletion, as the decreases in mortality resulting from SAI‐induced improvements in air quality outweigh the increases in mortality due to increased UV radiation exposure. Such chemical feedbacks also lead to improved plant growth. Our results show the importance of including fuller representations of atmospheric chemistry in studies of solar geoengineering and underscore the risk of surprises from this technology that could carry unexpected consequences for Earth's climate, the biosphere, and human health.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000911geoengineeringsolar radiation managementstratospheric aerosol injectionclimateatmospheric chemistrypublic health
spellingShingle Jonathan M. Moch
Loretta J. Mickley
Sebastian D. Eastham
Elizabeth W. Lundgren
Viral Shah
Jonathan J. Buonocore
Jacky Y. S. Pang
Mehliyar Sadiq
Amos P. K. Tai
Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
AGU Advances
geoengineering
solar radiation management
stratospheric aerosol injection
climate
atmospheric chemistry
public health
title Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
title_full Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
title_fullStr Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
title_full_unstemmed Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
title_short Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
title_sort overlooked long term atmospheric chemical feedbacks alter the impact of solar geoengineering implications for tropospheric oxidative capacity
topic geoengineering
solar radiation management
stratospheric aerosol injection
climate
atmospheric chemistry
public health
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000911
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanmmoch overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT lorettajmickley overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT sebastiandeastham overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT elizabethwlundgren overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT viralshah overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT jonathanjbuonocore overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT jackyyspang overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT mehliyarsadiq overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity
AT amospktai overlookedlongtermatmosphericchemicalfeedbacksaltertheimpactofsolargeoengineeringimplicationsfortroposphericoxidativecapacity