Revision total knee replacement case‐mix at a major revision centre

Revision total knee replacement case‐mix at a major revision centre

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Shiraz A. Sabah, Lennart vonFritsch, Tanvir Khan, Alexander D. Shearman, Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran, Oxford Revision Arthroplasty Group, David J. Beard, Andrew J. Price, Abtin Alvand
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:	Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00462-2

Similar Items

Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
by: Shiraz A. Sabah, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre
by: Sabah, S, et al.
Published: (2022)

Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Revision knee replacement for prosthetic joint infection: epidemiology, clinical outcomes and health-economic considerations
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2021)

No exponential rise in revision knee replacement surgery over the past 15 years: an analysis from the National Joint Registry
by: Sabah, S, et al.
Published: (2022)

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2021)

Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2021)

Epidemiology of revision hip replacement surgery in the UK over the past 15 years—an analysis from the National Joint Registry
by: Stavros Petrou, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

The experience of patients undergoing aseptic, elective revision knee joint replacement surgery: a qualitative study
by: Nicolson, PJA, et al.
Published: (2024)

Manipulation under anaesthetic following primary knee arthroplasty is associated with a higher rate of subsequent revision surgery
by: Abram, S, et al.
Published: (2020)

Patient-reported function and quality of life after revision total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 10,727 patients from the NHS PROMs program
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2021)

Patient-relevant outcomes following first revision total knee arthroplasty, by diagnosis
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Re-revision knee arthroplasty in a tertiary center: infection and multiple previous surgeries were associated with poor early clinical and functional outcomes
by: von Fritsch, L, et al.
Published: (2023)

Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist
by: Sabah, SA, et al.
Published: (2021)

Differences in mortality and complication rates following revision knee arthroplasty performed for urgent versus elective indications
by: Abram, SGF, et al.
Published: (2021)

Knee replacement
by: Price, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Epidemiology of revision hip replacement surgery in the UK over the past 15 years—an analysis from the National Joint Registry
by: Sabah, S, et al.
Published: (2023)

Lifetime risk of revision surgery: an analysis of 54,456 total knee replacements
by: Bayliss, L, et al.
Published: (2017)

Knee and hip replacements and the risk of revision
by: Burn, E, et al.
Published: (2019)

Infectious Complication of Revision Knee Replacement
by: S. N. Leonova, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry
by: Deere, K, et al.
Published: (2021)

The principle of the joint line restoring in revision knee replacement
by: D.N. Efimov, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Most unicompartmental knee replacement revisions could be avoided: A radiographic evaluation of revised Oxford Knees in the National Joint Registry
by: Kennedy, JA, et al.
Published: (2020)

Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: A BASK surgical practice guideline
by: Kalson, NS, et al.
Published: (2021)

Impact of Comorbidities and Previous Surgery on Mid-Term Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
by: Kevin-Arno Koch, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test at between 48 and 72hours pre-operatively is safe for patients undergoing primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty – a multicentre international study
by: Hamilton, TW, et al.
Published: (2022)

Anglo-American cataloguing rules : revisions 1983/
by: Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR
Published: (1984)

Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement.
by: Liddle, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review
by: Xu, J, et al.
Published: (2022)

Successful revision of an infected and challenging knee replacement: A case report
by: Leo Joseph
Published: (2023-09-01)

Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
by: Brianna Fram, MD, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

TREATMENT OF INSUFFICIENT JOINT EXTENSOR MECHANISM IN PRIMARY AND REVISION KNEE REPLACEMENT
by: T. A. Kulyaba, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint replacement registries
by: Brian J. McGrory, MD, MS, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)

Knee replacement.
by: Carr, A, et al.
Published: (2012)

Knee replacement.
by: Carr, A, et al.
Published: (2012)

The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study
by: Bayliss, L, et al.
Published: (2017)

Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement
by: Liddle, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

Impact of long-term follow-up on revision of knee and hip replacement surgery
by: Kolovos, S, et al.
Published: (2021)

Lifetime revision risk for medial unicompartmental knee replacement is lower than expected
by: Kennedy, JA, et al.
Published: (2020)

Comparative evaluation of bone defect replacement methods in revision total knee arthroplasty
by: Girkalo, Mikhail V., et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)