Are markets more accurate than polls? The surprising informational value of “just asking”
Psychologists typically measure beliefs and preferences using self-reports, whereas economists are much more likely to infer them from behavior. Prediction markets appear to be a victory for the economic approach, having yielded more accurate probability estimates than opinion polls or experts for a...
Main Authors: | Jason Dana, Pavel Atanasov, Philip Tetlock, Barbara Mellers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003375/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Are markets more
accurate than polls? The surprising informational value of “just
asking”
by: Jason Dana, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Are markets more accurate than polls? The surprising informational value of “just asking” – CORRIGENDUM
by: Jason Dana, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Developing expert political judgment: The impact of training and practice on judgmental accuracy in geopolitical forecasting tournaments
by: Welton Chang, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Developing expert
political judgment: The impact of training and practice on judgmental accuracy
in geopolitical forecasting tournaments
by: Welton Chang, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals
by: Andreas Graefe
Published: (2018-07-01)