Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study

Background: Alpha-2‑adrenergic agonists have synergistic action with local anesthetics and may prolong the duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesia obtained with spinal anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, and the seconda...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arvind Khare, Beena Thada, Laxmi Narayan Solanky, Veena Mathur, Deepak Garg, Pradeep Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=4;spage=252;epage=259;aulast=Khare
_version_ 1817986184003977216
author Arvind Khare
Beena Thada
Laxmi Narayan Solanky
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
Pradeep Kumar
author_facet Arvind Khare
Beena Thada
Laxmi Narayan Solanky
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
Pradeep Kumar
author_sort Arvind Khare
collection DOAJ
description Background: Alpha-2‑adrenergic agonists have synergistic action with local anesthetics and may prolong the duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesia obtained with spinal anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate onset of sensory and motor blockade, perioperative sedation, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects after intravenous (IV) infusion of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on spinal block characteristics as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on a total of 100 patients belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologist class I and II undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group CN (n = 50) received 1.5 µg/kg clonidine infusion and Group DM (n = 50) received 0.75 µg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion in 100 mL NS over 15 min before spinal anesthesia. Results: The duration of analgesia was statistically significantly prolonged in Group DM (251.70 ± 6.264 min) when compared with Group CN (213.02±10.374 min) (P < 0.001). The onset of sensory and motor blockade was faster in Group DM when compared with Group CN (P < 0.001). Recovery of sensory block was prolonged in Group DM when compared with Group CN (P < 0.001), but recovery of motor block was comparable in both the groups. The hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups without any significant adverse effects. Conclusion: Premedication with IV dexmedetomidine infusion is better than that with IV clonidine infusion to provide intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesia as premedication with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% spinal anesthesia.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:06:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bbda82a1d1484fcf9ac88aca1cc9bf5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2549-2276
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:06:08Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-bbda82a1d1484fcf9ac88aca1cc9bf5a2022-12-22T02:23:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsBali Journal of Anesthesiology2549-22762021-01-015425225910.4103/bjoa.BJOA_47_21Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective studyArvind KhareBeena ThadaLaxmi Narayan SolankyVeena MathurDeepak GargPradeep KumarBackground: Alpha-2‑adrenergic agonists have synergistic action with local anesthetics and may prolong the duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesia obtained with spinal anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the duration of analgesia, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate onset of sensory and motor blockade, perioperative sedation, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects after intravenous (IV) infusion of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on spinal block characteristics as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on a total of 100 patients belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologist class I and II undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group CN (n = 50) received 1.5 µg/kg clonidine infusion and Group DM (n = 50) received 0.75 µg/kg dexmedetomidine infusion in 100 mL NS over 15 min before spinal anesthesia. Results: The duration of analgesia was statistically significantly prolonged in Group DM (251.70 ± 6.264 min) when compared with Group CN (213.02±10.374 min) (P < 0.001). The onset of sensory and motor blockade was faster in Group DM when compared with Group CN (P < 0.001). Recovery of sensory block was prolonged in Group DM when compared with Group CN (P < 0.001), but recovery of motor block was comparable in both the groups. The hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups without any significant adverse effects. Conclusion: Premedication with IV dexmedetomidine infusion is better than that with IV clonidine infusion to provide intraoperative sedation and postoperative analgesia as premedication with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% spinal anesthesia.http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=4;spage=252;epage=259;aulast=Khareinfraumbilical surgeriesinj. clonidineinj. dexmedetomidineiv infusionspinal anesthesia
spellingShingle Arvind Khare
Beena Thada
Laxmi Narayan Solanky
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
Pradeep Kumar
Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
infraumbilical surgeries
inj. clonidine
inj. dexmedetomidine
iv infusion
spinal anesthesia
title Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
title_full Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
title_fullStr Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
title_short Clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
title_sort clonidine versus dexmedetomidine as premedication to intrathecal 0 5 bupivacaine a randomized double blind prospective study
topic infraumbilical surgeries
inj. clonidine
inj. dexmedetomidine
iv infusion
spinal anesthesia
url http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=4;spage=252;epage=259;aulast=Khare
work_keys_str_mv AT arvindkhare clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT beenathada clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT laxminarayansolanky clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT veenamathur clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT deepakgarg clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT pradeepkumar clonidineversusdexmedetomidineaspremedicationtointrathecal05bupivacainearandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy