The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players

In this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Žiga Kozinc, Nejc Šarabon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584696/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818834203464171520
author Žiga Kozinc
Nejc Šarabon
author_facet Žiga Kozinc
Nejc Šarabon
author_sort Žiga Kozinc
collection DOAJ
description In this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic postural stability index were considered. The analysis of differences between the legs was done based on two methods for a priori determination of leg preference, one based on the preference of kicking a ball and one based on the preference for single-leg jumping. An additional analysis was done based on the leg dominance (determined post hoc), based on the observed performance of the tasks. In case of the classification based on kicking a ball, there was a statistically significantly lower CoP anterior-posterior velocity and anterior-posterior amplitude in static balance task (p ≤ 0.017; 0.17 ≤ d ≤ 0.28) for the preferred leg. The CoP frequency was higher in the preferred leg for both directions (p ≤ 0.002; 0.10 ≤ d ≤ 0.22). For the landing task, CoP medial-lateral time to stabilization was statistically significantly shorter for the preferred leg (0.28 ± 0.38 s) compared to the non-preferred leg (0.47 ± 0.60 s) (p = 0.012; d = 0.38). There were no differences between the legs for the landing task. Moreover, there were no differences between the legs when we used the preference based on jumping for either of the tasks (d ≤ 0.14). The differences between legs in terms of observed dominance were larger than the differences based on the preference, which stresses the need for clear distinction of limb preference and limb dominance in research and practice. Regarding the effect of leg preference, small differences in static balance may exist between the legs (when the preference is based on kicking a ball).
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:31:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bbe3804e5f074c79b95a826f786f878e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:31:05Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-bbe3804e5f074c79b95a826f786f878e2022-12-21T20:39:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011611The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis playersŽiga KozincNejc ŠarabonIn this study, 90 (51 males, 39 females) tennis players performed single-leg quiet stance and single-leg landing tasks. For the static standing task, center-of pressure (CoP) velocities, amplitudes, frequency and area were calculated. For the landing tasks, time to stabilization as well as dynamic postural stability index were considered. The analysis of differences between the legs was done based on two methods for a priori determination of leg preference, one based on the preference of kicking a ball and one based on the preference for single-leg jumping. An additional analysis was done based on the leg dominance (determined post hoc), based on the observed performance of the tasks. In case of the classification based on kicking a ball, there was a statistically significantly lower CoP anterior-posterior velocity and anterior-posterior amplitude in static balance task (p ≤ 0.017; 0.17 ≤ d ≤ 0.28) for the preferred leg. The CoP frequency was higher in the preferred leg for both directions (p ≤ 0.002; 0.10 ≤ d ≤ 0.22). For the landing task, CoP medial-lateral time to stabilization was statistically significantly shorter for the preferred leg (0.28 ± 0.38 s) compared to the non-preferred leg (0.47 ± 0.60 s) (p = 0.012; d = 0.38). There were no differences between the legs for the landing task. Moreover, there were no differences between the legs when we used the preference based on jumping for either of the tasks (d ≤ 0.14). The differences between legs in terms of observed dominance were larger than the differences based on the preference, which stresses the need for clear distinction of limb preference and limb dominance in research and practice. Regarding the effect of leg preference, small differences in static balance may exist between the legs (when the preference is based on kicking a ball).https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584696/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Žiga Kozinc
Nejc Šarabon
The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
PLoS ONE
title The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_full The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_fullStr The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_full_unstemmed The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_short The effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly-trained tennis players
title_sort effects of leg preference and leg dominance on static and dynamic balance performance in highly trained tennis players
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8584696/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT zigakozinc theeffectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT nejcsarabon theeffectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT zigakozinc effectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers
AT nejcsarabon effectsoflegpreferenceandlegdominanceonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinhighlytrainedtennisplayers