The possibilities and limits of non-territorial autonomy in securing indigenous self-determination
Non-territorial autonomy (NTA) incorporates a mixture of different arrangements such as consociationalism and national-cultural autonomy (NCA), and forms of representation that de-territorialize self-determination. The paper analyses NTA possibilities in reaching indigenous self-governance...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2020/0353-57382003363S.pdf |
| Summary: | Non-territorial autonomy (NTA) incorporates a mixture of different
arrangements such as consociationalism and national-cultural autonomy (NCA),
and forms of representation that de-territorialize self-determination. The
paper analyses NTA possibilities in reaching indigenous self-governance and
reveals the dilemmas in the applicability of NTA for securing the right to
self-determination of indigenous peoples. Although the practice points
towards some positive examples and successes of NTA institutions related to
ingenious peoples (e.g. Sámi Parliaments), the question remains whether NTA
holds sufficient potential for addressing indigenous needs upheld by the
international principle “right to land, territories and traditionally owned
resources.” |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0353-5738 2334-8577 |