Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers

Background: Many patients do not use inhalers correctly. Inhalers associated with good technique have the potential to improve symptom control and are often preferred by patients. Methods: Inhaler-naïve, adult volunteers were randomized to use empty Spiromax®, Easyhaler®, and Turbuhaler® dry powder...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Per Rönmark, Birgitta Jagorstrand, Guilherme Safioti, Sreedevi Menon, Leif Bjermer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:European Clinical Respiratory Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1529536
_version_ 1818328195798138880
author Per Rönmark
Birgitta Jagorstrand
Guilherme Safioti
Sreedevi Menon
Leif Bjermer
author_facet Per Rönmark
Birgitta Jagorstrand
Guilherme Safioti
Sreedevi Menon
Leif Bjermer
author_sort Per Rönmark
collection DOAJ
description Background: Many patients do not use inhalers correctly. Inhalers associated with good technique have the potential to improve symptom control and are often preferred by patients. Methods: Inhaler-naïve, adult volunteers were randomized to use empty Spiromax®, Easyhaler®, and Turbuhaler® dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in one of six possible sequences in this single-site, single-visit, crossover study conducted in Sweden. Randomization was stratified by age and gender. Participants attempted to use each device intuitively (no instructions) and after reading the instructions for use from the patient information leaflet. Device preference was surveyed after using all devices. Mastery of device handling (i.e. dose preparation) or inhalation was defined as having no healthcare-professional-observed errors. The primary endpoint was mastery of device handling after reading the instructions. Results: More participants mastered device handling with Spiromax vs Easyhaler or Turbuhaler, both intuitively (44%, 0%, and 10%, respectively) and after reading the instructions (99%, 56%, and 81%, respectively). Fewer participants had ≥1 device-handling error with Spiromax than with the other devices. The percentage of participants still showing inhalation errors after reading the instructions ranged between 21% for Spiromax and 40% for Easyhaler. After reading instructions, mastery of handling and inhalation was numerically lower among older (aged >60 years) vs younger participants across all devices. Most participants preferred Spiromax for device handling (59%) and intuitiveness/ease of use (61%). Conclusion: These findings highlight that important differences exist between DPI devices, which could have implications for disease control when selecting a device for a patient.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:28:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc165fc538d941cdba38d3c3117df47c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2001-8525
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:28:19Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series European Clinical Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj.art-bc165fc538d941cdba38d3c3117df47c2022-12-21T23:46:10ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Clinical Respiratory Journal2001-85252018-01-015110.1080/20018525.2018.15295361529536Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteersPer Rönmark0Birgitta Jagorstrand1Guilherme Safioti2Sreedevi Menon3Leif Bjermer4Praktikertjänst ABSkåne University HospitalTeva PharmaceuticalsCognub Decision Solutions (formerly known as Kreara Solutions Pvt Ltd)Lund UniversityBackground: Many patients do not use inhalers correctly. Inhalers associated with good technique have the potential to improve symptom control and are often preferred by patients. Methods: Inhaler-naïve, adult volunteers were randomized to use empty Spiromax®, Easyhaler®, and Turbuhaler® dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in one of six possible sequences in this single-site, single-visit, crossover study conducted in Sweden. Randomization was stratified by age and gender. Participants attempted to use each device intuitively (no instructions) and after reading the instructions for use from the patient information leaflet. Device preference was surveyed after using all devices. Mastery of device handling (i.e. dose preparation) or inhalation was defined as having no healthcare-professional-observed errors. The primary endpoint was mastery of device handling after reading the instructions. Results: More participants mastered device handling with Spiromax vs Easyhaler or Turbuhaler, both intuitively (44%, 0%, and 10%, respectively) and after reading the instructions (99%, 56%, and 81%, respectively). Fewer participants had ≥1 device-handling error with Spiromax than with the other devices. The percentage of participants still showing inhalation errors after reading the instructions ranged between 21% for Spiromax and 40% for Easyhaler. After reading instructions, mastery of handling and inhalation was numerically lower among older (aged >60 years) vs younger participants across all devices. Most participants preferred Spiromax for device handling (59%) and intuitiveness/ease of use (61%). Conclusion: These findings highlight that important differences exist between DPI devices, which could have implications for disease control when selecting a device for a patient.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1529536Dry powder inhalerasthmaCOPDinhalation drug administrationinhalation therapymedication adherence
spellingShingle Per Rönmark
Birgitta Jagorstrand
Guilherme Safioti
Sreedevi Menon
Leif Bjermer
Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
European Clinical Respiratory Journal
Dry powder inhaler
asthma
COPD
inhalation drug administration
inhalation therapy
medication adherence
title Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
title_full Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
title_fullStr Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
title_short Comparison of correct technique and preference for Spiromax®, Easyhaler® and Turbuhaler®: a single-site, single-visit, crossover study in inhaler-naïve adult volunteers
title_sort comparison of correct technique and preference for spiromax r easyhaler r and turbuhaler r a single site single visit crossover study in inhaler naive adult volunteers
topic Dry powder inhaler
asthma
COPD
inhalation drug administration
inhalation therapy
medication adherence
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1529536
work_keys_str_mv AT perronmark comparisonofcorrecttechniqueandpreferenceforspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyininhalernaiveadultvolunteers
AT birgittajagorstrand comparisonofcorrecttechniqueandpreferenceforspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyininhalernaiveadultvolunteers
AT guilhermesafioti comparisonofcorrecttechniqueandpreferenceforspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyininhalernaiveadultvolunteers
AT sreedevimenon comparisonofcorrecttechniqueandpreferenceforspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyininhalernaiveadultvolunteers
AT leifbjermer comparisonofcorrecttechniqueandpreferenceforspiromaxeasyhalerandturbuhalerasinglesitesinglevisitcrossoverstudyininhalernaiveadultvolunteers