Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses
Diagnosis of respiratory viruses traditionally relies on deep oropharynx or nasopharynx swabs collected by healthcare workers (HCW). However, outpatients must make an appointment, and the procedure can cause discomfort in patients. Self-collecting has the potential as a strategy to improve participa...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical Virology Plus |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000552 |
| _version_ | 1811298246167887872 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacky Flipse John W.A. Rossen Gertjan H.J. Wagenvoort |
| author_facet | Jacky Flipse John W.A. Rossen Gertjan H.J. Wagenvoort |
| author_sort | Jacky Flipse |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Diagnosis of respiratory viruses traditionally relies on deep oropharynx or nasopharynx swabs collected by healthcare workers (HCW). However, outpatients must make an appointment, and the procedure can cause discomfort in patients. Self-collecting has the potential as a strategy to improve participants’ willingness to participate in diagnostics, surveillance, or studies.We compared self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses and compared the average cycle threshold (Ct)-values with those of samples collected by HCW. The study was conducted among technicians of the Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Zwolle, the Netherlands, and their family members, between April 2019 and March 2020. It included a questionnaire regarding the severity and date of first symptoms and an assessment of the sampling experience. The primary outcome was the mean Ct of positive PCRs. Similar mean Ct values were obtained using self- or HCW-collected swabs. In addition, gargle fluids and self-swabbed specimens had comparable detection rates of respiratory viruses. Notably, most participants preferred gargling over self-swabbing. Interestingly, but not surprisingly, the time between the onset of symptoms and sampling was shorter in PCR-positive compared to PCR-negative participants.Though this study was abrogated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the results indicate that both self-swabs and gargle fluids are acceptable for diagnosing common respiratory viruses in the outpatient population, including influenza virus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, SARS-CoV-2 and endemic human coronaviruses. Gargling could be considered an alternative sampling strategy and may enhance willingness to participate in screenings or diagnostics for respiratory viruses. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:16:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bc1c83c8d4f64affb4e7767028c77561 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2667-0380 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:16:35Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical Virology Plus |
| spelling | doaj.art-bc1c83c8d4f64affb4e7767028c775612022-12-22T02:58:49ZengElsevierJournal of Clinical Virology Plus2667-03802022-11-0124100116Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory virusesJacky Flipse0John W.A. Rossen1Gertjan H.J. Wagenvoort2Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Rijnstate Hospital, Velp, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Rijnstate Hospital, Velp, the Netherlands.Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the NetherlandsLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.Diagnosis of respiratory viruses traditionally relies on deep oropharynx or nasopharynx swabs collected by healthcare workers (HCW). However, outpatients must make an appointment, and the procedure can cause discomfort in patients. Self-collecting has the potential as a strategy to improve participants’ willingness to participate in diagnostics, surveillance, or studies.We compared self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses and compared the average cycle threshold (Ct)-values with those of samples collected by HCW. The study was conducted among technicians of the Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Zwolle, the Netherlands, and their family members, between April 2019 and March 2020. It included a questionnaire regarding the severity and date of first symptoms and an assessment of the sampling experience. The primary outcome was the mean Ct of positive PCRs. Similar mean Ct values were obtained using self- or HCW-collected swabs. In addition, gargle fluids and self-swabbed specimens had comparable detection rates of respiratory viruses. Notably, most participants preferred gargling over self-swabbing. Interestingly, but not surprisingly, the time between the onset of symptoms and sampling was shorter in PCR-positive compared to PCR-negative participants.Though this study was abrogated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the results indicate that both self-swabs and gargle fluids are acceptable for diagnosing common respiratory viruses in the outpatient population, including influenza virus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, SARS-CoV-2 and endemic human coronaviruses. Gargling could be considered an alternative sampling strategy and may enhance willingness to participate in screenings or diagnostics for respiratory viruses.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000552Self-collectionSelf-samplingGargle fluidRespiratory virusMolecular diagnostics |
| spellingShingle | Jacky Flipse John W.A. Rossen Gertjan H.J. Wagenvoort Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses Journal of Clinical Virology Plus Self-collection Self-sampling Gargle fluid Respiratory virus Molecular diagnostics |
| title | Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| title_full | Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| title_fullStr | Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| title_short | Self-collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| title_sort | self collected gargle fluids and nasopharyngeal swabs as a strategy for molecular diagnostics of respiratory viruses |
| topic | Self-collection Self-sampling Gargle fluid Respiratory virus Molecular diagnostics |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000552 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jackyflipse selfcollectedgarglefluidsandnasopharyngealswabsasastrategyformoleculardiagnosticsofrespiratoryviruses AT johnwarossen selfcollectedgarglefluidsandnasopharyngealswabsasastrategyformoleculardiagnosticsofrespiratoryviruses AT gertjanhjwagenvoort selfcollectedgarglefluidsandnasopharyngealswabsasastrategyformoleculardiagnosticsofrespiratoryviruses |