When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review

Intoduction: Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the use of percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been studied for augmentation of junc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek T. Cawley, Kiran Divani, Roozbeh Shafafy, Aiden Devitt, Sean Molloy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Brain and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423000140
_version_ 1827591495998242816
author Derek T. Cawley
Kiran Divani
Roozbeh Shafafy
Aiden Devitt
Sean Molloy
author_facet Derek T. Cawley
Kiran Divani
Roozbeh Shafafy
Aiden Devitt
Sean Molloy
author_sort Derek T. Cawley
collection DOAJ
description Intoduction: Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the use of percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been studied for augmentation of junctional levels to offset against kyphosis and failure, its deployment around existing loose screws or in failing surrounding bone as a salvage percutaneous procedure has been described in small case series and merits review. Research Question: How effective and safe is the use of PMMA as a salvage procedure for mechanical complications in failed spinal fusion?. Materials and Methods: Systematic search of online databases for clinical studies using this technique. Results: 11 studies were identified, only consisting of two case reports and nine case series. Consistent improvements were observed in pre- to post-operative VAS and with sustained improvements at final follow-up. The extra- or para-pedicular approach was the most frequent access trajectory. Most studies cited difficulties with visibility on fluoroscopy, using navigation or oblique views as a solution for this. Discussion and Conclusions: Percutaneous cementation at a failing screw-bone interface stabilises further micromotion with reductions in back pain. This rarely used technique is manifested by a low but increasing number of reported cases. The technique warrants further evaluation and is best performed within a multidisciplinary setting at a specialist centre. Notwithstanding that underlying pathology may not be addressed, awareness of this technique may allow an effective and safe salvage solution with minimal morbidity for older sicker patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:33:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc1d7f251189474982389d4b23f9a1d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-5294
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:33:30Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain and Spine
spelling doaj.art-bc1d7f251189474982389d4b23f9a1d12023-12-09T06:08:51ZengElsevierBrain and Spine2772-52942023-01-013101726When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic reviewDerek T. Cawley0Kiran Divani1Roozbeh Shafafy2Aiden Devitt3Sean Molloy4Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, 1, Ireland; Dept of Spinal Surgery, University of Galway, Ireland; Corresponding author. Dept of Spinal Surgery, RNOH Stanmore, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.Royal London Hospital, Barts Health, London, UKDept of Spinal Surgery, RNOH Stanmore, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UKDept of Spinal Surgery, University of Galway, IrelandDept of Spinal Surgery, RNOH Stanmore, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UKIntoduction: Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the use of percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been studied for augmentation of junctional levels to offset against kyphosis and failure, its deployment around existing loose screws or in failing surrounding bone as a salvage percutaneous procedure has been described in small case series and merits review. Research Question: How effective and safe is the use of PMMA as a salvage procedure for mechanical complications in failed spinal fusion?. Materials and Methods: Systematic search of online databases for clinical studies using this technique. Results: 11 studies were identified, only consisting of two case reports and nine case series. Consistent improvements were observed in pre- to post-operative VAS and with sustained improvements at final follow-up. The extra- or para-pedicular approach was the most frequent access trajectory. Most studies cited difficulties with visibility on fluoroscopy, using navigation or oblique views as a solution for this. Discussion and Conclusions: Percutaneous cementation at a failing screw-bone interface stabilises further micromotion with reductions in back pain. This rarely used technique is manifested by a low but increasing number of reported cases. The technique warrants further evaluation and is best performed within a multidisciplinary setting at a specialist centre. Notwithstanding that underlying pathology may not be addressed, awareness of this technique may allow an effective and safe salvage solution with minimal morbidity for older sicker patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423000140Pedicle screwsPolymethylmethacrylateVertebroplastyNon-unionJunctional failureScrew loosening
spellingShingle Derek T. Cawley
Kiran Divani
Roozbeh Shafafy
Aiden Devitt
Sean Molloy
When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
Brain and Spine
Pedicle screws
Polymethylmethacrylate
Vertebroplasty
Non-union
Junctional failure
Screw loosening
title When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
title_full When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
title_fullStr When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
title_short When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review
title_sort when spinal instrumentation revision is not an option salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications a systematic review
topic Pedicle screws
Polymethylmethacrylate
Vertebroplasty
Non-union
Junctional failure
Screw loosening
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423000140
work_keys_str_mv AT derektcawley whenspinalinstrumentationrevisionisnotanoptionsalvagevertebralaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylateformechanicalcomplicationsasystematicreview
AT kirandivani whenspinalinstrumentationrevisionisnotanoptionsalvagevertebralaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylateformechanicalcomplicationsasystematicreview
AT roozbehshafafy whenspinalinstrumentationrevisionisnotanoptionsalvagevertebralaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylateformechanicalcomplicationsasystematicreview
AT aidendevitt whenspinalinstrumentationrevisionisnotanoptionsalvagevertebralaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylateformechanicalcomplicationsasystematicreview
AT seanmolloy whenspinalinstrumentationrevisionisnotanoptionsalvagevertebralaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylateformechanicalcomplicationsasystematicreview