Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.

Background: Buccal mucosal graft is commonly used in substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. However, the optimal management of the donor site remains a topic of debate. This prospective study aimed to compare the outcomes and morbidity associated with closure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arsalan Shezad, Tanzeel Gazder, Syed Rabiullah, Mazahir Zulfiqar, Usman Qamar, Haris Jameel, Saeed Abidi, Manzoor Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Advance Educational Institute & Research Centre 2023-06-01
Series:International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aeirc-edu.com/ojs14/index.php/IJEHSR/article/view/950
_version_ 1797803682088091648
author Arsalan Shezad
Tanzeel Gazder
Syed Rabiullah
Mazahir Zulfiqar
Usman Qamar
Haris Jameel
Saeed Abidi
Manzoor Hussain
author_facet Arsalan Shezad
Tanzeel Gazder
Syed Rabiullah
Mazahir Zulfiqar
Usman Qamar
Haris Jameel
Saeed Abidi
Manzoor Hussain
author_sort Arsalan Shezad
collection DOAJ
description Background: Buccal mucosal graft is commonly used in substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. However, the optimal management of the donor site remains a topic of debate. This prospective study aimed to compare the outcomes and morbidity associated with closure versus non-closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site in urethroplasty. Methodology: A total of 60 patients with anterior urethral strictures underwent buccal mucosal urethroplasty. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (non-closure, n=30) and group B (closure, n=30). Post-operative pain, perioral numbness, early return to diet, and swelling of the cheek were assessed and compared between the two groups. Pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.73 ± 13.42 years, and the mean length of the stricture was 58.45 ± 26.87 mm. Post-operative pain scores measured through VAS were comparable between the closure and non-closure groups at different time points. Perioral numbness was observed in 43.33% of the non-closure group and 30.0% of the closure group (p=0.284). Early return to diet was reported in 40.0% of the non-closure group and 70.0% of the closure group (p=0.019). Swelling of the cheek was noted in 53.33% of the non-closure group and 33.33% of the closure group (p=0.118). Conclusion: This study suggests that non-closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site in urethroplasty results in less post-operative pain, early return to diet, and lower perioral numbness. However, it is associated with increased swelling of the cheek. These findings support the use of non-closure as a viable alternative to closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is warranted to validate these findings and assess additional outcomes such as stricture recurrence and cosmetic outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:25:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc284e12bfe84856be8ead8f4ab3fd6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2307-3748
2310-3841
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:25:37Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Advance Educational Institute & Research Centre
record_format Article
series International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research
spelling doaj.art-bc284e12bfe84856be8ead8f4ab3fd6a2023-06-15T07:59:26ZengAdvance Educational Institute & Research CentreInternational Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research2307-37482310-38412023-06-01112Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.Arsalan Shezad0Tanzeel Gazder1Syed Rabiullah2Mazahir Zulfiqar3Usman Qamar4Haris Jameel5Saeed Abidi6Manzoor Hussain7Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.UrologyDepartment of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan.Department of Urology, SIUT, Karachi-Pakistan. Background: Buccal mucosal graft is commonly used in substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. However, the optimal management of the donor site remains a topic of debate. This prospective study aimed to compare the outcomes and morbidity associated with closure versus non-closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site in urethroplasty. Methodology: A total of 60 patients with anterior urethral strictures underwent buccal mucosal urethroplasty. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (non-closure, n=30) and group B (closure, n=30). Post-operative pain, perioral numbness, early return to diet, and swelling of the cheek were assessed and compared between the two groups. Pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.73 ± 13.42 years, and the mean length of the stricture was 58.45 ± 26.87 mm. Post-operative pain scores measured through VAS were comparable between the closure and non-closure groups at different time points. Perioral numbness was observed in 43.33% of the non-closure group and 30.0% of the closure group (p=0.284). Early return to diet was reported in 40.0% of the non-closure group and 70.0% of the closure group (p=0.019). Swelling of the cheek was noted in 53.33% of the non-closure group and 33.33% of the closure group (p=0.118). Conclusion: This study suggests that non-closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site in urethroplasty results in less post-operative pain, early return to diet, and lower perioral numbness. However, it is associated with increased swelling of the cheek. These findings support the use of non-closure as a viable alternative to closure of the buccal mucosal graft harvesting site. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is warranted to validate these findings and assess additional outcomes such as stricture recurrence and cosmetic outcomes. https://aeirc-edu.com/ojs14/index.php/IJEHSR/article/view/950Urethroplasty, Buccal Mucosal, Transamine, Urology, Visual Analog Scale
spellingShingle Arsalan Shezad
Tanzeel Gazder
Syed Rabiullah
Mazahir Zulfiqar
Usman Qamar
Haris Jameel
Saeed Abidi
Manzoor Hussain
Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research
Urethroplasty, Buccal Mucosal, Transamine, Urology, Visual Analog Scale
title Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
title_full Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
title_fullStr Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
title_short Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
title_sort comparison of closure versus non closure of buccal mucosal graft harvesting site in urethroplasty
topic Urethroplasty, Buccal Mucosal, Transamine, Urology, Visual Analog Scale
url https://aeirc-edu.com/ojs14/index.php/IJEHSR/article/view/950
work_keys_str_mv AT arsalanshezad comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT tanzeelgazder comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT syedrabiullah comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT mazahirzulfiqar comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT usmanqamar comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT harisjameel comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT saeedabidi comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty
AT manzoorhussain comparisonofclosureversusnonclosureofbuccalmucosalgraftharvestingsiteinurethroplasty