Equimodalidade e Hôs Epi To Poly no De Interpretatione 9
In the first part of De Interpretatione 9, Aristotle introduces an argument for fatalism that he obviously does not subscribe to. Readers of the chapter wonder how Aristotle replies to that argument. In this paper I claim that the main basis of his reply is the principle of equimodality stated in 19...
Main Author: | Ricardo Santos |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
Online Access: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185983 |
Similar Items
-
ARISTOTELIO KOMENTARAI: DE INTERPRETATIONE 9
by: Anicijus Manlijus Severinas Boecijus
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
by: M. A. Istvan Jr.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
by: M. A. Istvan Jr.
Published: (2014-08-01) -
Temporal Truth and Bivalence: an Anachronistic Formal Approach to Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 9
by: Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos
Published: (2023-05-01) -
De interpretatione christiana verbi „metanoia”
by: Jurand Maria Bakalarczy
Published: (2001-03-01)