Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver

Background: Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury often leads to increased complications and mortality after surgery. Although ischemic preconditioning is used as a convenient and effective method to protect the liver from warm ischemia reperfusion injury, the optimal protocol is currently unclear. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Lin, Hanfei Huang, Shikun Yang, Jian Duan, Wanggang Xu, Zhong Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Investigative Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1556753
_version_ 1797684694612967424
author Jie Lin
Hanfei Huang
Shikun Yang
Jian Duan
Wanggang Xu
Zhong Zeng
author_facet Jie Lin
Hanfei Huang
Shikun Yang
Jian Duan
Wanggang Xu
Zhong Zeng
author_sort Jie Lin
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury often leads to increased complications and mortality after surgery. Although ischemic preconditioning is used as a convenient and effective method to protect the liver from warm ischemia reperfusion injury, the optimal protocol is currently unclear. Therefore, in this study, we sought to identify ideal conditions and methods for ischemic preconditioning. Materials and methods: We compared several preconditioning protocols of the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cycle in 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats (5 groups, n = 6), including relevant sham and I/R injury (no preconditioning) controls. Experimental group conditions included: (1) ischemia for 5 min/reperfusion for 10 min (ischemic preconditioning 1, IPC-1); (2) ischemia for 5 min/reperfusion for 5 min, repeated three times (IPC-2); and (3) ischemia for 10 min/reperfusion for 10 min (IPC-3). Readouts included transaminase activity levels measured from collected sera, and histopathological changes, liver cell apoptosis, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, glutathione (GSH) levels, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels measured from collected liver tissue segments subjected to warm ischemia (that is from the 70% of the liver mass that had been deprived from blood flow during the ischemia phase). Results: Compared to the I/R control group, the IPC-1, IPC-2, and IPC-3 groups all showed significant decreases in liver transaminase activity levels, alleviation of pathological injury-associated changes, and a decrease in liver cell apoptosis. Moreover, SOD activity and GSH content were increased while MDA content was decreased in the three experimental groups. Compared to the IPC-1 and IPC-3 groups, the changes in the IPC-2 group were the most significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ischemic preconditioning can reduce hepatic warm ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. The IPC-2 protocol, involving ischemia for 5 min and reperfusion for 5 min, repeated three times, provided the optimal protection against hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury among the protocols studied.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:33:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc396c93a3ba4c3ca3531dab18e76237
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0894-1939
1521-0553
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:33:26Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Investigative Surgery
spelling doaj.art-bc396c93a3ba4c3ca3531dab18e762372023-09-15T10:07:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Investigative Surgery0894-19391521-05532020-10-0133987688310.1080/08941939.2018.15567531556753Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat LiverJie Lin0Hanfei Huang1Shikun Yang2Jian Duan3Wanggang Xu4Zhong Zeng5Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityOrgan Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityOrgan Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityOrgan Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityOrgan Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityOrgan Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityBackground: Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury often leads to increased complications and mortality after surgery. Although ischemic preconditioning is used as a convenient and effective method to protect the liver from warm ischemia reperfusion injury, the optimal protocol is currently unclear. Therefore, in this study, we sought to identify ideal conditions and methods for ischemic preconditioning. Materials and methods: We compared several preconditioning protocols of the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cycle in 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats (5 groups, n = 6), including relevant sham and I/R injury (no preconditioning) controls. Experimental group conditions included: (1) ischemia for 5 min/reperfusion for 10 min (ischemic preconditioning 1, IPC-1); (2) ischemia for 5 min/reperfusion for 5 min, repeated three times (IPC-2); and (3) ischemia for 10 min/reperfusion for 10 min (IPC-3). Readouts included transaminase activity levels measured from collected sera, and histopathological changes, liver cell apoptosis, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, glutathione (GSH) levels, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels measured from collected liver tissue segments subjected to warm ischemia (that is from the 70% of the liver mass that had been deprived from blood flow during the ischemia phase). Results: Compared to the I/R control group, the IPC-1, IPC-2, and IPC-3 groups all showed significant decreases in liver transaminase activity levels, alleviation of pathological injury-associated changes, and a decrease in liver cell apoptosis. Moreover, SOD activity and GSH content were increased while MDA content was decreased in the three experimental groups. Compared to the IPC-1 and IPC-3 groups, the changes in the IPC-2 group were the most significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ischemic preconditioning can reduce hepatic warm ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. The IPC-2 protocol, involving ischemia for 5 min and reperfusion for 5 min, repeated three times, provided the optimal protection against hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury among the protocols studied.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1556753ischemic preconditioningischemia reperfusion injuryratprotocol
spellingShingle Jie Lin
Hanfei Huang
Shikun Yang
Jian Duan
Wanggang Xu
Zhong Zeng
Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
Journal of Investigative Surgery
ischemic preconditioning
ischemia reperfusion injury
rat
protocol
title Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
title_full Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
title_fullStr Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
title_full_unstemmed Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
title_short Protective Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Liver
title_sort protective effects of ischemic preconditioning protocols on ischemia reperfusion injury in rat liver
topic ischemic preconditioning
ischemia reperfusion injury
rat
protocol
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1556753
work_keys_str_mv AT jielin protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver
AT hanfeihuang protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver
AT shikunyang protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver
AT jianduan protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver
AT wanggangxu protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver
AT zhongzeng protectiveeffectsofischemicpreconditioningprotocolsonischemiareperfusioninjuryinratliver