Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock

Abstract Cardiogenic shock is usually defined as primary cardiac dysfunction with low cardiac output leading to critical organ hypoperfusion, and tissue hypoxia, resulting in high mortality rate between 40% and 50% despite recent advances. Many studies have now evidenced that cardiogenic shock not o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamid Merdji, Bruno Levy, Christian Jung, Can Ince, Martin Siegemund, Ferhat Meziani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-05-01
Series:Annals of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01130-z
_version_ 1797831906506571776
author Hamid Merdji
Bruno Levy
Christian Jung
Can Ince
Martin Siegemund
Ferhat Meziani
author_facet Hamid Merdji
Bruno Levy
Christian Jung
Can Ince
Martin Siegemund
Ferhat Meziani
author_sort Hamid Merdji
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Cardiogenic shock is usually defined as primary cardiac dysfunction with low cardiac output leading to critical organ hypoperfusion, and tissue hypoxia, resulting in high mortality rate between 40% and 50% despite recent advances. Many studies have now evidenced that cardiogenic shock not only involves systemic macrocirculation, such as blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, or cardiac output, but also involves significant systemic microcirculatory abnormalities which seem strongly associated with the outcome. Although microcirculation has been widely studied in the context of septic shock showing heterogeneous alterations with clear evidence of macro and microcirculation uncoupling, there is now a growing body of literature focusing on cardiogenic shock states. Even if there is currently no consensus regarding the treatment of microcirculatory disturbances in cardiogenic shock, some treatments seem to show a benefit. Furthermore, a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology may provide hypotheses for future studies aiming to improve cardiogenic shock prognosis. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:00:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc4798bf1693487eb056edf6e3dfca2a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2110-5820
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:00:20Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Annals of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-bc4798bf1693487eb056edf6e3dfca2a2023-05-07T11:23:35ZengSpringerOpenAnnals of Intensive Care2110-58202023-05-0113111510.1186/s13613-023-01130-zMicrocirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shockHamid Merdji0Bruno Levy1Christian Jung2Can Ince3Martin Siegemund4Ferhat Meziani5Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University HospitalInstitut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Medical Intensive Care Unit Brabois, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, INSERM U1116Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-UniversityDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterIntensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University HospitalFaculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)Abstract Cardiogenic shock is usually defined as primary cardiac dysfunction with low cardiac output leading to critical organ hypoperfusion, and tissue hypoxia, resulting in high mortality rate between 40% and 50% despite recent advances. Many studies have now evidenced that cardiogenic shock not only involves systemic macrocirculation, such as blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, or cardiac output, but also involves significant systemic microcirculatory abnormalities which seem strongly associated with the outcome. Although microcirculation has been widely studied in the context of septic shock showing heterogeneous alterations with clear evidence of macro and microcirculation uncoupling, there is now a growing body of literature focusing on cardiogenic shock states. Even if there is currently no consensus regarding the treatment of microcirculatory disturbances in cardiogenic shock, some treatments seem to show a benefit. Furthermore, a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology may provide hypotheses for future studies aiming to improve cardiogenic shock prognosis. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01130-zCardiogenic shockHeart failureMicrocirculationMacrocirculationPerfusion parameters
spellingShingle Hamid Merdji
Bruno Levy
Christian Jung
Can Ince
Martin Siegemund
Ferhat Meziani
Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
Annals of Intensive Care
Cardiogenic shock
Heart failure
Microcirculation
Macrocirculation
Perfusion parameters
title Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
title_full Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
title_fullStr Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
title_full_unstemmed Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
title_short Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
title_sort microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock
topic Cardiogenic shock
Heart failure
Microcirculation
Macrocirculation
Perfusion parameters
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01130-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidmerdji microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock
AT brunolevy microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock
AT christianjung microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock
AT canince microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock
AT martinsiegemund microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock
AT ferhatmeziani microcirculatorydysfunctionincardiogenicshock