Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)

The basic purpose of the paper is to present the famous and historical reasoning of ancient logician Diodor Cronos in a framework of the point ontology of time (POT). Diodor created his argument to prove that his definitions of alethic modalities in temporal terms are correct. We do not know details...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomasz Jarmużek
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2006-06-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1192711475.pdf
_version_ 1828430956155895808
author Tomasz Jarmużek
author_facet Tomasz Jarmużek
author_sort Tomasz Jarmużek
collection DOAJ
description The basic purpose of the paper is to present the famous and historical reasoning of ancient logician Diodor Cronos in a framework of the point ontology of time (POT). Diodor created his argument to prove that his definitions of alethic modalities in temporal terms are correct. We do not know details of it, especially we do not know the body of the reasoning. Instead of this we have premises and conclusion of the argument. If we want to know anything of assumptions concerning the concept of time involved in the reasoning, we have to reconstruct Diodor's proof. POT is the most popular and old kind of representation of time. In fact it is far from perfection but it allows us in a very elegant and easy way to model different sorts of time (branching, linear, dense etc.). Using some historical aspects of the reasoning and logic of temporal realization the author shows the reconstruction according the idea of Nicholas Rescher. The proof gives an answer what kinds of properties of time the reasoning needs in order to be conclusive. It turns out that the minimal requirements are linearity and non-ending, i.e. the lack of the latest moment of time. In the paper rhe author refers to other reconstructions that do not need, for example, linearity and enable us to allow the time to be branched in the future. It means that different approaches to the formal tools and Diodor's premises give different answer to the main question.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:55:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc4ea0b871a64ffba47ed262f9e88f66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1734-9923
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:55:39Z
publishDate 2006-06-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
record_format Article
series Analiza i Egzystencja
spelling doaj.art-bc4ea0b871a64ffba47ed262f9e88f662022-12-22T01:38:57ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja1734-99232006-06-013197215Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)Tomasz JarmużekThe basic purpose of the paper is to present the famous and historical reasoning of ancient logician Diodor Cronos in a framework of the point ontology of time (POT). Diodor created his argument to prove that his definitions of alethic modalities in temporal terms are correct. We do not know details of it, especially we do not know the body of the reasoning. Instead of this we have premises and conclusion of the argument. If we want to know anything of assumptions concerning the concept of time involved in the reasoning, we have to reconstruct Diodor's proof. POT is the most popular and old kind of representation of time. In fact it is far from perfection but it allows us in a very elegant and easy way to model different sorts of time (branching, linear, dense etc.). Using some historical aspects of the reasoning and logic of temporal realization the author shows the reconstruction according the idea of Nicholas Rescher. The proof gives an answer what kinds of properties of time the reasoning needs in order to be conclusive. It turns out that the minimal requirements are linearity and non-ending, i.e. the lack of the latest moment of time. In the paper rhe author refers to other reconstructions that do not need, for example, linearity and enable us to allow the time to be branched in the future. It means that different approaches to the formal tools and Diodor's premises give different answer to the main question.http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1192711475.pdfDIODOR CRONOSPUNCTUAL ONTOLOGY OF TIMERESCHER NICHOLAS
spellingShingle Tomasz Jarmużek
Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
Analiza i Egzystencja
DIODOR CRONOS
PUNCTUAL ONTOLOGY OF TIME
RESCHER NICHOLAS
title Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
title_full Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
title_fullStr Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
title_full_unstemmed Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
title_short Rekonstrukcje rozumowania Diodora Kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego (RECONSTRUCTIONS OF DIODOR CRONOS' REASONING IN POINT ONTOLOGY OF TIME)
title_sort rekonstrukcje rozumowania diodora kronosa w ontologii czasu punktowego reconstructions of diodor cronos reasoning in point ontology of time
topic DIODOR CRONOS
PUNCTUAL ONTOLOGY OF TIME
RESCHER NICHOLAS
url http://usfiles.us.szc.pl/pliki/plik_1192711475.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszjarmuzek rekonstrukcjerozumowaniadiodorakronosawontologiiczasupunktowegoreconstructionsofdiodorcronosreasoninginpointontologyoftime