“Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception
“Provincial”, “indigenous” and “capital” sciences (according to terms used by M. Sokolov and K. Titaev) are compared with each other in terms of their audibility to the world’s scientific community and their intellectual mobility. The appeal of scientists’ workplaces and living space is revealed as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
2016-03-01
|
| Series: | Социологический журнал |
| Online Access: | http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3917/submission/proof/3917-61-8604-1-10-20161003.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819267874943926272 |
|---|---|
| author | Nikolai S. Rozov |
| author_facet | Nikolai S. Rozov |
| author_sort | Nikolai S. Rozov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | “Provincial”, “indigenous” and “capital” sciences (according to terms used by M. Sokolov and K. Titaev) are compared with each other in terms of their audibility to the world’s scientific community and their intellectual mobility. The appeal of scientists’ workplaces and living space is revealed as three types of comfort: life sustenance comfort, social comfort and spiritual comfort. The recognition of their scholarship and personal reputation form the foundation for scientists’ social comfort, and they depend on the significance and novelty of their research. Spiritual comfort is defined by a sense of genuine learning, a sense of participating in “true science”. This “authenticity” can be confirmed only by long-term recognition, which brings us back to the theme of “capitalness” as a central proposition in intellectual networks. Thirteen factors of the successful attainment of a “capital” status are marked out according to the case of the Chicago School of Sociology. The opportunity to record and use them in the current situation of social sciences in Russia is revealed as a means of overcoming the long-standing split between “provincial” and “indigenous” sciences. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T21:24:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bc50e90822fa4c33afef66d7fbfeea7a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1562-2495 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T21:24:06Z |
| publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Социологический журнал |
| spelling | doaj.art-bc50e90822fa4c33afef66d7fbfeea7a2022-12-21T17:30:40ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952016-03-0122102510.19181/socjour.2016.22.1.39173917“Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social PerceptionNikolai S. Rozov0Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences“Provincial”, “indigenous” and “capital” sciences (according to terms used by M. Sokolov and K. Titaev) are compared with each other in terms of their audibility to the world’s scientific community and their intellectual mobility. The appeal of scientists’ workplaces and living space is revealed as three types of comfort: life sustenance comfort, social comfort and spiritual comfort. The recognition of their scholarship and personal reputation form the foundation for scientists’ social comfort, and they depend on the significance and novelty of their research. Spiritual comfort is defined by a sense of genuine learning, a sense of participating in “true science”. This “authenticity” can be confirmed only by long-term recognition, which brings us back to the theme of “capitalness” as a central proposition in intellectual networks. Thirteen factors of the successful attainment of a “capital” status are marked out according to the case of the Chicago School of Sociology. The opportunity to record and use them in the current situation of social sciences in Russia is revealed as a means of overcoming the long-standing split between “provincial” and “indigenous” sciences.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3917/submission/proof/3917-61-8604-1-10-20161003.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Nikolai S. Rozov “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception Социологический журнал |
| title | “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception |
| title_full | “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception |
| title_fullStr | “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception |
| title_short | “Provincialism”, “Indigenity”, and Factors of Intellectual “Capitalness” in Social Perception |
| title_sort | provincialism indigenity and factors of intellectual capitalness in social perception |
| url | http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3917/submission/proof/3917-61-8604-1-10-20161003.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nikolaisrozov provincialismindigenityandfactorsofintellectualcapitalnessinsocialperception |