CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Using of information technologies and, in particular, learning management systems, increases opportunities of teachers and students in reaching their goals in education. Such systems provide learning content, help organize and monitor training, collect progress statistics and take into account the i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Belarusian National Technical University
2016-11-01
|
| Series: | Системный анализ и прикладная информатика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sapi.bntu.by/jour/article/view/120 |
| _version_ | 1826557732598054912 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu. B. Popova |
| author_facet | Yu. B. Popova |
| author_sort | Yu. B. Popova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Using of information technologies and, in particular, learning management systems, increases opportunities of teachers and students in reaching their goals in education. Such systems provide learning content, help organize and monitor training, collect progress statistics and take into account the individual characteristics of each user. Currently, there is a huge inventory of both paid and free systems are physically located both on college servers and in the cloud, offering different features sets of different licensing scheme and the cost. This creates the problem of choosing the best system. This problem is partly due to the lack of comprehensive classification of such systems. Analysis of more than 30 of the most common now automated learning management systems has shown that a classification of such systems should be carried out according to certain criteria, under which the same type of system can be considered. As classification features offered by the author are: cost, functionality, modularity, keeping the customer’s requirements, the integration of content, the physical location of a system, adaptability training. Considering the learning management system within these classifications and taking into account the current trends of their development, it is possible to identify the main requirements to them: functionality, reliability, ease of use, low cost, support for SCORM standard or Tin Can API, modularity and adaptability. According to the requirements at the Software Department of FITR BNTU under the guidance of the author since 2009 take place the development, the use and continuous improvement of their own learning management system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T01:20:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bc5673c7f2f94f2c835d168f78c33bec |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2309-4923 2414-0481 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-03-14T08:33:16Z |
| publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
| publisher | Belarusian National Technical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Системный анализ и прикладная информатика |
| spelling | doaj.art-bc5673c7f2f94f2c835d168f78c33bec2025-03-02T13:01:34ZengBelarusian National Technical UniversityСистемный анализ и прикладная информатика2309-49232414-04812016-11-01035158102CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSYu. B. Popova0Belarusian National Technical UniversityUsing of information technologies and, in particular, learning management systems, increases opportunities of teachers and students in reaching their goals in education. Such systems provide learning content, help organize and monitor training, collect progress statistics and take into account the individual characteristics of each user. Currently, there is a huge inventory of both paid and free systems are physically located both on college servers and in the cloud, offering different features sets of different licensing scheme and the cost. This creates the problem of choosing the best system. This problem is partly due to the lack of comprehensive classification of such systems. Analysis of more than 30 of the most common now automated learning management systems has shown that a classification of such systems should be carried out according to certain criteria, under which the same type of system can be considered. As classification features offered by the author are: cost, functionality, modularity, keeping the customer’s requirements, the integration of content, the physical location of a system, adaptability training. Considering the learning management system within these classifications and taking into account the current trends of their development, it is possible to identify the main requirements to them: functionality, reliability, ease of use, low cost, support for SCORM standard or Tin Can API, modularity and adaptability. According to the requirements at the Software Department of FITR BNTU under the guidance of the author since 2009 take place the development, the use and continuous improvement of their own learning management system.https://sapi.bntu.by/jour/article/view/120: learning management systemthe lmslearning systeme-learning |
| spellingShingle | Yu. B. Popova CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Системный анализ и прикладная информатика : learning management system the lms learning system e-learning |
| title | CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| title_full | CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| title_fullStr | CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| title_full_unstemmed | CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| title_short | CLASSIFICATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| title_sort | classification of learning management systems |
| topic | : learning management system the lms learning system e-learning |
| url | https://sapi.bntu.by/jour/article/view/120 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yubpopova classificationoflearningmanagementsystems |