Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Identification of alterations in ALK gene and development of ALK-directed therapies have increased the need for accurate and efficient detection methodologies. To date, research has focused on the concordance between the two most commonly used technologies, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shivang Doshi, David Ray, Karen Stein, Jie Zhang, Prasad Koduru, Franz Fogt, Axel Wellman, Ricky Wat, Charles Mathews
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/6/1/4
_version_ 1811187354094796800
author Shivang Doshi
David Ray
Karen Stein
Jie Zhang
Prasad Koduru
Franz Fogt
Axel Wellman
Ricky Wat
Charles Mathews
author_facet Shivang Doshi
David Ray
Karen Stein
Jie Zhang
Prasad Koduru
Franz Fogt
Axel Wellman
Ricky Wat
Charles Mathews
author_sort Shivang Doshi
collection DOAJ
description Identification of alterations in ALK gene and development of ALK-directed therapies have increased the need for accurate and efficient detection methodologies. To date, research has focused on the concordance between the two most commonly used technologies, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, inter-test concordance reflects only one, albeit important, aspect of the diagnostic process; laboratories, hospitals, and payors must understand the cost and workflow of ALK rearrangement detection strategies. Through literature review combined with interviews of pathologists and laboratory directors in the U.S. and Europe, a cost-impact model was developed that compared four alternative testing strategies—IHC only, FISH only, IHC pre-screen followed by FISH confirmation, and parallel testing by both IHC and FISH. Interviews were focused on costs of reagents, consumables, equipment, and personnel. The resulting model showed that testing by IHC alone cost less ($90.07 in the U.S., $68.69 in Europe) than either independent or parallel testing by both FISH and IHC ($441.85 in the U.S. and $279.46 in Europe). The strategies differed in cost of execution, turnaround time, reimbursement, and number of positive results detected, suggesting that laboratories must weigh the costs and the clinical benefit of available ALK testing strategies.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:01:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc5717a0087048249e02d76ba460d5c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:01:47Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-bc5717a0087048249e02d76ba460d5c92022-12-22T04:20:07ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182016-01-0161410.3390/diagnostics6010004diagnostics6010004Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung CancerShivang Doshi0David Ray1Karen Stein2Jie Zhang3Prasad Koduru4Franz Fogt5Axel Wellman6Ricky Wat7Charles Mathews8Boston Healthcare Associates, 75 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110, USAErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, 160 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway Township, NJ 08854, USANovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USANovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USAUT Southwestern Medical Center, 2330 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75235, USAPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USAThe Pathological Institute Celle, Wittinger Str. 14, 29223 Celle, GermanyBoston Healthcare Associates, 75 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110, USABoston Healthcare Associates, 75 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110, USAIdentification of alterations in ALK gene and development of ALK-directed therapies have increased the need for accurate and efficient detection methodologies. To date, research has focused on the concordance between the two most commonly used technologies, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, inter-test concordance reflects only one, albeit important, aspect of the diagnostic process; laboratories, hospitals, and payors must understand the cost and workflow of ALK rearrangement detection strategies. Through literature review combined with interviews of pathologists and laboratory directors in the U.S. and Europe, a cost-impact model was developed that compared four alternative testing strategies—IHC only, FISH only, IHC pre-screen followed by FISH confirmation, and parallel testing by both IHC and FISH. Interviews were focused on costs of reagents, consumables, equipment, and personnel. The resulting model showed that testing by IHC alone cost less ($90.07 in the U.S., $68.69 in Europe) than either independent or parallel testing by both FISH and IHC ($441.85 in the U.S. and $279.46 in Europe). The strategies differed in cost of execution, turnaround time, reimbursement, and number of positive results detected, suggesting that laboratories must weigh the costs and the clinical benefit of available ALK testing strategies.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/6/1/4Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangementimmunohistochemistry (IHC)fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)cost-impact model
spellingShingle Shivang Doshi
David Ray
Karen Stein
Jie Zhang
Prasad Koduru
Franz Fogt
Axel Wellman
Ricky Wat
Charles Mathews
Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Diagnostics
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement
immunohistochemistry (IHC)
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
cost-impact model
title Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Economic Analysis of Alternative Strategies for Detection of ALK Rearrangements in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort economic analysis of alternative strategies for detection of alk rearrangements in non small cell lung cancer
topic Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement
immunohistochemistry (IHC)
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
cost-impact model
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/6/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT shivangdoshi economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT davidray economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT karenstein economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jiezhang economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT prasadkoduru economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT franzfogt economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT axelwellman economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rickywat economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT charlesmathews economicanalysisofalternativestrategiesfordetectionofalkrearrangementsinnonsmallcelllungcancer