Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival

Abstract Flushing is a common measure to manage and reduce the amount of sediment stored in reservoirs. However, the sudden release of large volumes of sediment abruptly increases the suspended solids concentration and alters the riverbed composition. Similar effects can be produced also by natural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manisha Panthi, Aaron A. Lee, Sudesh Dahal, Amgad Omer, Mário J. Franca, Alessandra Crosato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19294-2
_version_ 1811267458464481280
author Manisha Panthi
Aaron A. Lee
Sudesh Dahal
Amgad Omer
Mário J. Franca
Alessandra Crosato
author_facet Manisha Panthi
Aaron A. Lee
Sudesh Dahal
Amgad Omer
Mário J. Franca
Alessandra Crosato
author_sort Manisha Panthi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Flushing is a common measure to manage and reduce the amount of sediment stored in reservoirs. However, the sudden release of large volumes of sediment abruptly increases the suspended solids concentration and alters the riverbed composition. Similar effects can be produced also by natural flood events. Do flushing operations have more detrimental impacts than natural floods? To answer this question, we investigated the impact of flushing on the survival of the Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Sandy River (OR, USA), assuming that sediment is flushed from hypothetical bottom gates of the, now decommissioned, Marmot Dam. The effects of several flushing scenarios are analyzed with a 2D morphodynamic model, together with habitat suitability curves and stress indicators. The results show that attention has to be paid to duration: the shorter the flushing operation, the lesser the stresses on fish survival and spawning habitats. Flushing causes high stress to salmon eggs and larvae, due to unbearable levels of suspended sediment concentrations. It also decreases the areas usable for spawning due to fine-sediment deposition, with up to 95% loss at peak flow. Without the dam, the corresponding natural flood event would produce similar effects, with up to 93% loss. The study shows that well-planned flushing operations could mimic a natural impact, but only partly. In the long-term, larger losses of spawning grounds can be expected, since the removal of fine sediment with the release of clear water from the reservoir is a lengthy process that may be undesirable due to water storage reduction.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:02:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc5bd6b6c2de429999bec72f265c944d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:02:52Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-bc5bd6b6c2de429999bec72f265c944d2022-12-22T03:16:47ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-09-0112111710.1038/s41598-022-19294-2Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survivalManisha Panthi0Aaron A. Lee1Sudesh Dahal2Amgad Omer3Mário J. Franca4Alessandra Crosato5Department of Water Resources and Ecosystem, IHE Delft Institute for Water EducationNatural Systems DesignLaboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology, ETH ZürichRivers-Reservoirs Dynamics and Morphology, DeltaresDepartment of Water Resources and Ecosystem, IHE Delft Institute for Water EducationDepartment of Water Resources and Ecosystem, IHE Delft Institute for Water EducationAbstract Flushing is a common measure to manage and reduce the amount of sediment stored in reservoirs. However, the sudden release of large volumes of sediment abruptly increases the suspended solids concentration and alters the riverbed composition. Similar effects can be produced also by natural flood events. Do flushing operations have more detrimental impacts than natural floods? To answer this question, we investigated the impact of flushing on the survival of the Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Sandy River (OR, USA), assuming that sediment is flushed from hypothetical bottom gates of the, now decommissioned, Marmot Dam. The effects of several flushing scenarios are analyzed with a 2D morphodynamic model, together with habitat suitability curves and stress indicators. The results show that attention has to be paid to duration: the shorter the flushing operation, the lesser the stresses on fish survival and spawning habitats. Flushing causes high stress to salmon eggs and larvae, due to unbearable levels of suspended sediment concentrations. It also decreases the areas usable for spawning due to fine-sediment deposition, with up to 95% loss at peak flow. Without the dam, the corresponding natural flood event would produce similar effects, with up to 93% loss. The study shows that well-planned flushing operations could mimic a natural impact, but only partly. In the long-term, larger losses of spawning grounds can be expected, since the removal of fine sediment with the release of clear water from the reservoir is a lengthy process that may be undesirable due to water storage reduction.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19294-2
spellingShingle Manisha Panthi
Aaron A. Lee
Sudesh Dahal
Amgad Omer
Mário J. Franca
Alessandra Crosato
Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
Scientific Reports
title Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
title_full Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
title_fullStr Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
title_full_unstemmed Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
title_short Effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on Chinook salmon survival
title_sort effects of sediment flushing operations versus natural floods on chinook salmon survival
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19294-2
work_keys_str_mv AT manishapanthi effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival
AT aaronalee effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival
AT sudeshdahal effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival
AT amgadomer effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival
AT mariojfranca effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival
AT alessandracrosato effectsofsedimentflushingoperationsversusnaturalfloodsonchinooksalmonsurvival