Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials

Prolonged use of a standard mouse is associated with musculoskeletal symptoms. This review provides professionals with in-depth analysis of the literature regarding the evidence behind the use of alternative computer mouse designs and their ability to reduce discomfort in mouse users, in addition to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Radwan, Tyler Kallasy, Abigail Monroe, Emily Chrisman, Orrin Carpenter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1521503
_version_ 1797714182515195904
author Ahmed Radwan
Tyler Kallasy
Abigail Monroe
Emily Chrisman
Orrin Carpenter
author_facet Ahmed Radwan
Tyler Kallasy
Abigail Monroe
Emily Chrisman
Orrin Carpenter
author_sort Ahmed Radwan
collection DOAJ
description Prolonged use of a standard mouse is associated with musculoskeletal symptoms. This review provides professionals with in-depth analysis of the literature regarding the evidence behind the use of alternative computer mouse designs and their ability to reduce discomfort in mouse users, in addition to the potential effect of ergonomics training and forearm supports. Multiple data bases were searched by independent researchers to identify 17 high-quality controlled trials including varieties of acceptable mouse designs (vertical, slanted, upright, roller bar, biofeedback and others). Methodological quality of these studies were assessed by independent raters utilizing the PEDro quality assessment scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) scale, and the results revealed that included studies were of moderate quality (5–6/10) and had some intrinsic ROB. It is concluded that there is moderate quality of evidence to support the use of alternative mouse designs to reduce discomfort, promote posture and decrease unnecessary muscle activation, especially if accompanied by appropriate ergonomic training. However, standard mouse still offers appropriate users preference levels. Hence, the consensus is that, mouse selection and purchase should be an individualized process based on individual needs and work demands and that there is no universal model that works well with everyone.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:48:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bc7928de579e43a1bdfb92df83c4818a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-1916
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:48:09Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Engineering
spelling doaj.art-bc7928de579e43a1bdfb92df83c4818a2023-09-02T20:51:12ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162018-01-015110.1080/23311916.2018.15215031521503Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trialsAhmed Radwan0Tyler Kallasy1Abigail Monroe2Emily Chrisman3Orrin Carpenter4Utica CollegeUtica CollegeUtica CollegeUtica CollegeUtica CollegeProlonged use of a standard mouse is associated with musculoskeletal symptoms. This review provides professionals with in-depth analysis of the literature regarding the evidence behind the use of alternative computer mouse designs and their ability to reduce discomfort in mouse users, in addition to the potential effect of ergonomics training and forearm supports. Multiple data bases were searched by independent researchers to identify 17 high-quality controlled trials including varieties of acceptable mouse designs (vertical, slanted, upright, roller bar, biofeedback and others). Methodological quality of these studies were assessed by independent raters utilizing the PEDro quality assessment scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) scale, and the results revealed that included studies were of moderate quality (5–6/10) and had some intrinsic ROB. It is concluded that there is moderate quality of evidence to support the use of alternative mouse designs to reduce discomfort, promote posture and decrease unnecessary muscle activation, especially if accompanied by appropriate ergonomic training. However, standard mouse still offers appropriate users preference levels. Hence, the consensus is that, mouse selection and purchase should be an individualized process based on individual needs and work demands and that there is no universal model that works well with everyone.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1521503computer mousepainfatiguediscomfortand repetitive stress injuries
spellingShingle Ahmed Radwan
Tyler Kallasy
Abigail Monroe
Emily Chrisman
Orrin Carpenter
Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
Cogent Engineering
computer mouse
pain
fatigue
discomfort
and repetitive stress injuries
title Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
title_full Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
title_fullStr Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
title_short Benefits of alternative computer mouse designs: A systematic review of controlled trials
title_sort benefits of alternative computer mouse designs a systematic review of controlled trials
topic computer mouse
pain
fatigue
discomfort
and repetitive stress injuries
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1521503
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedradwan benefitsofalternativecomputermousedesignsasystematicreviewofcontrolledtrials
AT tylerkallasy benefitsofalternativecomputermousedesignsasystematicreviewofcontrolledtrials
AT abigailmonroe benefitsofalternativecomputermousedesignsasystematicreviewofcontrolledtrials
AT emilychrisman benefitsofalternativecomputermousedesignsasystematicreviewofcontrolledtrials
AT orrincarpenter benefitsofalternativecomputermousedesignsasystematicreviewofcontrolledtrials