Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment

Charles E Cunningham,1 Tracy Hutchings,2 Jennifer Henderson,2 Heather Rimas,1 Yvonne Chen1 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 2Department of Quality and Performance, Hamilton Healt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cunningham CE, Hutchings T, Henderson J, Rimas H, Chen Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2016-07-01
Series:Patient Preference and Adherence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/modeling-the-hospital-safety-partnership-preferences-of-patients-and-t-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
_version_ 1818611898717831168
author Cunningham CE
Hutchings T
Henderson J
Rimas H
Chen Y
author_facet Cunningham CE
Hutchings T
Henderson J
Rimas H
Chen Y
author_sort Cunningham CE
collection DOAJ
description Charles E Cunningham,1 Tracy Hutchings,2 Jennifer Henderson,2 Heather Rimas,1 Yvonne Chen1 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 2Department of Quality and Performance, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada Background: Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. Objective: The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. Method: We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the safety partnership preferences of 1,084 patients or those such as parents acting on their behalf. Participants made choices between hypothetical safety partnerships composed by experimentally varying 15 four-level partnership design attributes. Results: Participants preferred an approach to safety based on partnerships between patients and staff rather than a model delegating responsibility for safety to hospital staff. They valued the opportunity to participate in point of service safety partnerships, such as identity and medication double checks, that might afford an immediate risk reduction. Latent class analysis yielded two segments. Actively engaged participants (73.3%) comprised outpatients with higher education, who anticipated more benefits to safety partnerships, were more confident in their ability to contribute, and were more intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer a personal engagement strategy, valued scientific evidence, preferred a more active approach to safety education, and advocated disclosure of errors. The passively engaged segment (26.7%) anticipated fewer benefits, were less confident in their ability to contribute, and were less intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer an engagement strategy based on signage. They preferred that staff explain why they thought patients should help make care safer and decide whether errors were disclosed. Inpatients, those with immigrant backgrounds, and those with less education were more likely to be in this segment. Conclusion: Health services need to communicate information regarding risks, ask about partnership preferences, create opportunities respecting individual differences, and ensure a positive response when patients raise safety concerns. Keywords: hospital safety, patients, partnerships, preferences, discrete choice conjoint experiment
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:37:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bca88299bd354f93a02b0d7bacebc6ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-889X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:37:39Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Patient Preference and Adherence
spelling doaj.art-bca88299bd354f93a02b0d7bacebc6ba2022-12-21T22:26:08ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2016-07-012016Issue 11359137228079Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experimentCunningham CEHutchings THenderson JRimas HChen YCharles E Cunningham,1 Tracy Hutchings,2 Jennifer Henderson,2 Heather Rimas,1 Yvonne Chen1 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 2Department of Quality and Performance, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada Background: Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. Objective: The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. Method: We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the safety partnership preferences of 1,084 patients or those such as parents acting on their behalf. Participants made choices between hypothetical safety partnerships composed by experimentally varying 15 four-level partnership design attributes. Results: Participants preferred an approach to safety based on partnerships between patients and staff rather than a model delegating responsibility for safety to hospital staff. They valued the opportunity to participate in point of service safety partnerships, such as identity and medication double checks, that might afford an immediate risk reduction. Latent class analysis yielded two segments. Actively engaged participants (73.3%) comprised outpatients with higher education, who anticipated more benefits to safety partnerships, were more confident in their ability to contribute, and were more intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer a personal engagement strategy, valued scientific evidence, preferred a more active approach to safety education, and advocated disclosure of errors. The passively engaged segment (26.7%) anticipated fewer benefits, were less confident in their ability to contribute, and were less intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer an engagement strategy based on signage. They preferred that staff explain why they thought patients should help make care safer and decide whether errors were disclosed. Inpatients, those with immigrant backgrounds, and those with less education were more likely to be in this segment. Conclusion: Health services need to communicate information regarding risks, ask about partnership preferences, create opportunities respecting individual differences, and ensure a positive response when patients raise safety concerns. Keywords: hospital safety, patients, partnerships, preferences, discrete choice conjoint experimenthttps://www.dovepress.com/modeling-the-hospital-safety-partnership-preferences-of-patients-and-t-peer-reviewed-article-PPAhospital safetypatientspartnershipsreferencesdiscrete choice conjoint experiment
spellingShingle Cunningham CE
Hutchings T
Henderson J
Rimas H
Chen Y
Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
Patient Preference and Adherence
hospital safety
patients
partnerships
references
discrete choice conjoint experiment
title Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_full Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_fullStr Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_short Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_sort modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families a discrete choice conjoint experiment
topic hospital safety
patients
partnerships
references
discrete choice conjoint experiment
url https://www.dovepress.com/modeling-the-hospital-safety-partnership-preferences-of-patients-and-t-peer-reviewed-article-PPA
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamce modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT hutchingst modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT hendersonj modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT rimash modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT cheny modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment