‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?

This paper is based on the experiences of completing a virtual mentoring programme within the higher education sector that used the principle of ‘cognitive pairing’ to enable the rapid establishment of high quality mentoring relationships. Although not originally designed as a research study, it was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fiona Beddoes-Jones, Julia Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Brookes University 2006-08-01
Series:International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/6da67d83-5539-4e71-bb7c-017356b3869e/1/vol04issue2-paper-04.pdf
_version_ 1797366972807118848
author Fiona Beddoes-Jones
Julia Miller
author_facet Fiona Beddoes-Jones
Julia Miller
author_sort Fiona Beddoes-Jones
collection DOAJ
description This paper is based on the experiences of completing a virtual mentoring programme within the higher education sector that used the principle of ‘cognitive pairing’ to enable the rapid establishment of high quality mentoring relationships. Although not originally designed as a research study, it was subsequently felt that the benefits of ‘cognitive pairing’ were significant enough to be promulgated. The paper briefly summarises research in the field of matching mentors and mentees by cognitive style preference and defines the principle of ‘cognitive pairing’. It then describes the instrument used for this research, Think Smart™ (BeddoesJones 2002), and its suitability for this programme. The aims of the mentoring programme and its design are outlined and the results discussed with reference to Kirkpatrick’s 4 levels of training evaluation (Kirkpatrick 1979 and 1994) and Clutterbuck’s measurements of mentoring success (Clutterbuck 2003). The effectiveness of using the principle of matching preferences in cognitive style in order to establish high quality ‘virtual’ relationships is considered, before concluding that using the principle of cognitive pairing within ‘virtual’ mentoring relationships can lead to both sustainable relationships and financial benefits.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:11:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bca8e9c53206452c9bca250c6c1d0ed8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn XXXX-XXXX
1741-8305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:11:12Z
publishDate 2006-08-01
publisher Oxford Brookes University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
spelling doaj.art-bca8e9c53206452c9bca250c6c1d0ed82024-01-03T22:11:18ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and MentoringXXXX-XXXX1741-83052006-08-01425460‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?Fiona Beddoes-Jones0Julia Miller1The Cognitive Fitness ConsultancyThe Cognitive Fitness ConsultancyThis paper is based on the experiences of completing a virtual mentoring programme within the higher education sector that used the principle of ‘cognitive pairing’ to enable the rapid establishment of high quality mentoring relationships. Although not originally designed as a research study, it was subsequently felt that the benefits of ‘cognitive pairing’ were significant enough to be promulgated. The paper briefly summarises research in the field of matching mentors and mentees by cognitive style preference and defines the principle of ‘cognitive pairing’. It then describes the instrument used for this research, Think Smart™ (BeddoesJones 2002), and its suitability for this programme. The aims of the mentoring programme and its design are outlined and the results discussed with reference to Kirkpatrick’s 4 levels of training evaluation (Kirkpatrick 1979 and 1994) and Clutterbuck’s measurements of mentoring success (Clutterbuck 2003). The effectiveness of using the principle of matching preferences in cognitive style in order to establish high quality ‘virtual’ relationships is considered, before concluding that using the principle of cognitive pairing within ‘virtual’ mentoring relationships can lead to both sustainable relationships and financial benefits.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/6da67d83-5539-4e71-bb7c-017356b3869e/1/vol04issue2-paper-04.pdfmatchingvirtual mentoringhigher educationThinkSmartcognitive pairing
spellingShingle Fiona Beddoes-Jones
Julia Miller
‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
matching
virtual mentoring
higher education
ThinkSmart
cognitive pairing
title ‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
title_full ‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
title_fullStr ‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
title_full_unstemmed ‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
title_short ‘Virtual’ mentoring: can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness?
title_sort virtual mentoring can the principle of cognitive pairing increase its effectiveness
topic matching
virtual mentoring
higher education
ThinkSmart
cognitive pairing
url https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/6da67d83-5539-4e71-bb7c-017356b3869e/1/vol04issue2-paper-04.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fionabeddoesjones virtualmentoringcantheprincipleofcognitivepairingincreaseitseffectiveness
AT juliamiller virtualmentoringcantheprincipleofcognitivepairingincreaseitseffectiveness