Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p>This study focuses on deliberative democracy practices in Caturtunggal village, specifically in the sub-village (<em>dusun</em>) of Seturan, Kar...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/10604 |
| _version_ | 1818950616220696576 |
|---|---|
| author | Husen Wijaya Abd. Hamid |
| author_facet | Husen Wijaya Abd. Hamid |
| author_sort | Husen Wijaya Abd. Hamid |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p>This study focuses on deliberative democracy practices in Caturtunggal village, specifically in the sub-village (<em>dusun</em>) of Seturan, Karangwuni, and Ambarukmo. The study assesses the quality of deliberation in these dusun by applying the three out of five indicators of deliberative democracy theory by Fishkin (2009), namely information, subtantantive balance, and equal consideration. This study deploys qualitative descriptive method and case-study approach with in-depth interview as the main data gathering technique. This deliberation has put Village Consultative Board (BPD) period of 2013-2019 as a mediator and to consider arguments and deliberative results. Based on the indicators which proposed by Fishkin, Seturan and Ambarukmo are categorized for having semi-ideal deliberation, meanwhile Karangwuni is categorized as not ideal. The study also finds elite capture practices in Seturan and Karangwuni, but they do not impact significantly. </p></div></div></div> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T09:21:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bcaa85e4309a45ca8285963e5f1b0a20 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2477-8060 2503-4456 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T09:21:25Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review |
| spelling | doaj.art-bcaa85e4309a45ca8285963e5f1b0a202022-12-21T19:45:18ZengPolitical Science Program, Universitas Negeri SemarangPolitik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review2477-80602503-44562018-01-0131497010.15294/jpi.v3i1.106046290Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, YogyakartaHusen Wijaya Abd. Hamid0Univeritas Gadjah Mada<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p>This study focuses on deliberative democracy practices in Caturtunggal village, specifically in the sub-village (<em>dusun</em>) of Seturan, Karangwuni, and Ambarukmo. The study assesses the quality of deliberation in these dusun by applying the three out of five indicators of deliberative democracy theory by Fishkin (2009), namely information, subtantantive balance, and equal consideration. This study deploys qualitative descriptive method and case-study approach with in-depth interview as the main data gathering technique. This deliberation has put Village Consultative Board (BPD) period of 2013-2019 as a mediator and to consider arguments and deliberative results. Based on the indicators which proposed by Fishkin, Seturan and Ambarukmo are categorized for having semi-ideal deliberation, meanwhile Karangwuni is categorized as not ideal. The study also finds elite capture practices in Seturan and Karangwuni, but they do not impact significantly. </p></div></div></div>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/10604Village Consultative Board (BPD)Quality of DeliberationIndonesia |
| spellingShingle | Husen Wijaya Abd. Hamid Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Village Consultative Board (BPD) Quality of Deliberation Indonesia |
| title | Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta |
| title_full | Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta |
| title_fullStr | Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta |
| title_full_unstemmed | Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta |
| title_short | Deliberative Debates in Investors Penetration Area: A Case Study of Village Deliberation by Village Consultative Board (BPD) in Caturtunggal Village, Yogyakarta |
| title_sort | deliberative debates in investors penetration area a case study of village deliberation by village consultative board bpd in caturtunggal village yogyakarta |
| topic | Village Consultative Board (BPD) Quality of Deliberation Indonesia |
| url | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/10604 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT husenwijayaabdhamid deliberativedebatesininvestorspenetrationareaacasestudyofvillagedeliberationbyvillageconsultativeboardbpdincaturtunggalvillageyogyakarta |