Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking

Hans-Georg Gadamer, despite his exchanges with and reception by major figures in the field of political theory, is often thought of as a philosopher as opposed to a political theorist. For instance, the title of one of his essays, "On the Political Incompetence of Philosophy," is sometime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sam McChesney
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Axia Academic Publishers 2022-12-01
Series:Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/305
_version_ 1797894418628345856
author Sam McChesney
author_facet Sam McChesney
author_sort Sam McChesney
collection DOAJ
description Hans-Georg Gadamer, despite his exchanges with and reception by major figures in the field of political theory, is often thought of as a philosopher as opposed to a political theorist. For instance, the title of one of his essays, "On the Political Incompetence of Philosophy," is sometimes taken to indicate that Gadamer thought of his own philosophy as "politically incompetent" (Code 2003, 15). In this paper, I argue that Gadamer's hermeneutic philosophy is deeply concerned with our relation to the political world. To bring out these political concerns, I put Gadamer in conversation with Hannah Arendt, who overtly disavowed philosophy in favor of political theory. I show that Gadamer and Arendt share many of the same worries about the solitary model of much philosophy – particularly that of Heidegger – and that both try to promote a more involved, worldly mode of thinking. For Arendt, this mode of thinking attends in large part to the newness and distinctiveness of other people, whereas Gadamer emphasizes what other people say and how we must relate to them if we are to understand what they are telling us. I argue that although these are complementary ways of addressing political thinking, one important advantage of Gadamer's account is the way it brings into view the centrality of courage for understanding our shared political world. Because understanding frequently requires that we question our identities and renegotiate our existing relation to the world in often uncomfortable ways, political thinking involves what I call "hermeneutic courage.".
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:09:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcbb0e0183e4424d94b6d3f36b4e9dbb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2410-4817
1561-8927
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:09:44Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Axia Academic Publishers
record_format Article
series Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
spelling doaj.art-bcbb0e0183e4424d94b6d3f36b4e9dbb2023-02-26T23:34:40ZdeuAxia Academic PublishersLabyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics2410-48171561-89272022-12-0124210.25180/lj.v24i2.305Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinkingSam McChesney 0Deptartment of Political Science, Northwestern University Hans-Georg Gadamer, despite his exchanges with and reception by major figures in the field of political theory, is often thought of as a philosopher as opposed to a political theorist. For instance, the title of one of his essays, "On the Political Incompetence of Philosophy," is sometimes taken to indicate that Gadamer thought of his own philosophy as "politically incompetent" (Code 2003, 15). In this paper, I argue that Gadamer's hermeneutic philosophy is deeply concerned with our relation to the political world. To bring out these political concerns, I put Gadamer in conversation with Hannah Arendt, who overtly disavowed philosophy in favor of political theory. I show that Gadamer and Arendt share many of the same worries about the solitary model of much philosophy – particularly that of Heidegger – and that both try to promote a more involved, worldly mode of thinking. For Arendt, this mode of thinking attends in large part to the newness and distinctiveness of other people, whereas Gadamer emphasizes what other people say and how we must relate to them if we are to understand what they are telling us. I argue that although these are complementary ways of addressing political thinking, one important advantage of Gadamer's account is the way it brings into view the centrality of courage for understanding our shared political world. Because understanding frequently requires that we question our identities and renegotiate our existing relation to the world in often uncomfortable ways, political thinking involves what I call "hermeneutic courage.". https://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/305Hans-Georg GadamerHannah Arendthermeneuticscourageethicspolitics
spellingShingle Sam McChesney
Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics
Hans-Georg Gadamer
Hannah Arendt
hermeneutics
courage
ethics
politics
title Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
title_full Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
title_fullStr Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
title_full_unstemmed Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
title_short Hermeneutic courage. What Gadamer (and Arendt) can tell us about political thinking
title_sort hermeneutic courage what gadamer and arendt can tell us about political thinking
topic Hans-Georg Gadamer
Hannah Arendt
hermeneutics
courage
ethics
politics
url https://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/305
work_keys_str_mv AT sammcchesney hermeneuticcouragewhatgadamerandarendtcantellusaboutpoliticalthinking