Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia

Abstract Background Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Durkadin Demir Eksi, Yiping Shen, Munire Erman, Lynn P. Chorich, Megan E. Sullivan, Meric Bilekdemir, Elanur Yılmaz, Guven Luleci, Hyung-Goo Kim, Ozgul M. Alper, Lawrence C. Layman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-02-01
Series:Molecular Cytogenetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3
_version_ 1818528861419208704
author Durkadin Demir Eksi
Yiping Shen
Munire Erman
Lynn P. Chorich
Megan E. Sullivan
Meric Bilekdemir
Elanur Yılmaz
Guven Luleci
Hyung-Goo Kim
Ozgul M. Alper
Lawrence C. Layman
author_facet Durkadin Demir Eksi
Yiping Shen
Munire Erman
Lynn P. Chorich
Megan E. Sullivan
Meric Bilekdemir
Elanur Yılmaz
Guven Luleci
Hyung-Goo Kim
Ozgul M. Alper
Lawrence C. Layman
author_sort Durkadin Demir Eksi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been described. However, the significance of these CNVs in the pathogenesis of MRKH is unknown, but suggests possible autosomal dominant inheritance. We are not aware of CNV studies in consanguineous patients, which could pinpoint genes important in autosomal recessive MRKH. We therefore utilized SNP/CGH microarrays to identify CNVs and define regions of homozygosity (ROH) in Anatolian Turkish MRKH patients. Result(s) Five different CNVs were detected in 4/19 patients (21%), one of which is a previously reported 16p11.2 deletion containing 32 genes, while four involved smaller regions each containing only one gene. Fourteen of 19 (74%) of patients had parents that were third degree relatives or closer. There were 42 regions of homozygosity shared by at least two MRKH patients which was spread throughout most chromosomes. Of interest, eight candidate genes suggested by human or animal studies (RBM8A, CMTM7, CCR4, TRIM71, CNOT10, TP63, EMX2, and CFTR) reside within these ROH. Conclusion(s) CNVs were found in about 20% of Turkish MRKH patients, and as in other studies, proof of causation is lacking. The 16p11.2 deletion seen in mixed populations is also identified in Turkish MRKH patients. Turkish MRKH patients have a higher likelihood of being consanguineous than the general Anatolian Turkish population. Although identified single gene mutations and heterozygous CNVs suggest autosomal dominant inheritance for MRKH in much of the western world, regions of homozygosity, which could contain shared mutant alleles, make it more likely that autosomal recessively inherited causes will be manifested in Turkish women with MRKH.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:55:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcbb663442044972bea523c7d3c2c957
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1755-8166
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:55:32Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Molecular Cytogenetics
spelling doaj.art-bcbb663442044972bea523c7d3c2c9572022-12-22T01:16:46ZengBMCMolecular Cytogenetics1755-81662018-02-011111810.1186/s13039-018-0359-3Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasiaDurkadin Demir Eksi0Yiping Shen1Munire Erman2Lynn P. Chorich3Megan E. Sullivan4Meric Bilekdemir5Elanur Yılmaz6Guven Luleci7Hyung-Goo Kim8Ozgul M. Alper9Lawrence C. Layman10Department of Medical Biology, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of MedicineGuangxi Maternal and Child Health HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University, Faculty of MedicineSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, & Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical College of Georgia at Augusta UniversitySection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, & Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical College of Georgia at Augusta UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University, Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University, Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University, Faculty of MedicineSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, & Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical College of Georgia at Augusta UniversityDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Akdeniz University, Faculty of MedicineSection of Reproductive Endocrinology, Infertility, & Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical College of Georgia at Augusta UniversityAbstract Background Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been described. However, the significance of these CNVs in the pathogenesis of MRKH is unknown, but suggests possible autosomal dominant inheritance. We are not aware of CNV studies in consanguineous patients, which could pinpoint genes important in autosomal recessive MRKH. We therefore utilized SNP/CGH microarrays to identify CNVs and define regions of homozygosity (ROH) in Anatolian Turkish MRKH patients. Result(s) Five different CNVs were detected in 4/19 patients (21%), one of which is a previously reported 16p11.2 deletion containing 32 genes, while four involved smaller regions each containing only one gene. Fourteen of 19 (74%) of patients had parents that were third degree relatives or closer. There were 42 regions of homozygosity shared by at least two MRKH patients which was spread throughout most chromosomes. Of interest, eight candidate genes suggested by human or animal studies (RBM8A, CMTM7, CCR4, TRIM71, CNOT10, TP63, EMX2, and CFTR) reside within these ROH. Conclusion(s) CNVs were found in about 20% of Turkish MRKH patients, and as in other studies, proof of causation is lacking. The 16p11.2 deletion seen in mixed populations is also identified in Turkish MRKH patients. Turkish MRKH patients have a higher likelihood of being consanguineous than the general Anatolian Turkish population. Although identified single gene mutations and heterozygous CNVs suggest autosomal dominant inheritance for MRKH in much of the western world, regions of homozygosity, which could contain shared mutant alleles, make it more likely that autosomal recessively inherited causes will be manifested in Turkish women with MRKH.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3Müllerian aplasiaMayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndromeMRKHCongenital absence of the uterus and vaginaCopy number variantCNV
spellingShingle Durkadin Demir Eksi
Yiping Shen
Munire Erman
Lynn P. Chorich
Megan E. Sullivan
Meric Bilekdemir
Elanur Yılmaz
Guven Luleci
Hyung-Goo Kim
Ozgul M. Alper
Lawrence C. Layman
Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
Molecular Cytogenetics
Müllerian aplasia
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome
MRKH
Congenital absence of the uterus and vagina
Copy number variant
CNV
title Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_full Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_fullStr Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_full_unstemmed Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_short Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_sort copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with mullerian aplasia
topic Müllerian aplasia
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome
MRKH
Congenital absence of the uterus and vagina
Copy number variant
CNV
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3
work_keys_str_mv AT durkadindemireksi copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT yipingshen copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT munireerman copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT lynnpchorich copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT meganesullivan copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT mericbilekdemir copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT elanuryılmaz copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT guvenluleci copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT hyunggookim copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT ozgulmalper copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT lawrenceclayman copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia