Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
Abstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) wit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1 |
_version_ | 1828160737851211776 |
---|---|
author | Alemayehu Hailu Bernt Lindtjørn Wakgari Deressa Taye Gari Eskindir Loha Bjarne Robberstad |
author_facet | Alemayehu Hailu Bernt Lindtjørn Wakgari Deressa Taye Gari Eskindir Loha Bjarne Robberstad |
author_sort | Alemayehu Hailu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) with respect to the added protection afforded is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of combined implementation of LLINs and IRS, compared with LLINs alone, IRS alone, and routine practice in Ethiopia. Methods The study was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial of malaria prevention conducted in Adami Tullu district, in Ethiopia, from 2014 to 2016. In addition, literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis—using effectiveness information from a systematic review of published articles was conducted. Costing of the interventions were done from the providers’ perspective. The health-effect was measured using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and combined with cost information using a Markov life-cycle model. In the base-case analysis, health-effects were based on the current trial, and in addition, a scenario analysis was performed based on a literature survey. Results The current trial-based analysis showed that routine practice is not less effective and therefore dominates both the combined intervention and singleton intervention due to lower costs. The literature-based analysis had shown that combined intervention had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 1403 per DALY averted, and USD 207 per DALY averted was estimated for LLIN alone. In order for the ICER for the combined intervention to be within a range of 1 GDP per capita per DALY averted, the annual malaria incidence in the area should be at least 13%, and the protective-effectiveness of combined implementation should be at least 53%. Conclusions Based on the current trial-based analysis, LLINs and IRS are not cost-effective compared to routine practice. However, based on the literature-based analysis, LLIN alone is likely to be cost-effective compared to 3 times GDP per capita per DALY averted. The annual malaria probability and protective-effectiveness of combined intervention are key determinants of the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Trial registration PACTR201411000882128 (Registered 8 September 2014). http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201411000882128 |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:26:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-bcbd2b2b56234d2aa4c750d79dac7ef7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1478-7547 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:26:02Z |
publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
spelling | doaj.art-bcbd2b2b56234d2aa4c750d79dac7ef72022-12-22T03:55:31ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472018-11-0116111710.1186/s12962-018-0164-1Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in EthiopiaAlemayehu Hailu0Bernt Lindtjørn1Wakgari Deressa2Taye Gari3Eskindir Loha4Bjarne Robberstad5Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa UniversitySchool of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa UniversitySchool of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa UniversityDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenAbstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) with respect to the added protection afforded is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of combined implementation of LLINs and IRS, compared with LLINs alone, IRS alone, and routine practice in Ethiopia. Methods The study was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial of malaria prevention conducted in Adami Tullu district, in Ethiopia, from 2014 to 2016. In addition, literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis—using effectiveness information from a systematic review of published articles was conducted. Costing of the interventions were done from the providers’ perspective. The health-effect was measured using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and combined with cost information using a Markov life-cycle model. In the base-case analysis, health-effects were based on the current trial, and in addition, a scenario analysis was performed based on a literature survey. Results The current trial-based analysis showed that routine practice is not less effective and therefore dominates both the combined intervention and singleton intervention due to lower costs. The literature-based analysis had shown that combined intervention had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 1403 per DALY averted, and USD 207 per DALY averted was estimated for LLIN alone. In order for the ICER for the combined intervention to be within a range of 1 GDP per capita per DALY averted, the annual malaria incidence in the area should be at least 13%, and the protective-effectiveness of combined implementation should be at least 53%. Conclusions Based on the current trial-based analysis, LLINs and IRS are not cost-effective compared to routine practice. However, based on the literature-based analysis, LLIN alone is likely to be cost-effective compared to 3 times GDP per capita per DALY averted. The annual malaria probability and protective-effectiveness of combined intervention are key determinants of the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Trial registration PACTR201411000882128 (Registered 8 September 2014). http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201411000882128http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1MalariaMalaria preventionEconomic evaluationLLINIRSCost-effectiveness |
spellingShingle | Alemayehu Hailu Bernt Lindtjørn Wakgari Deressa Taye Gari Eskindir Loha Bjarne Robberstad Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Malaria Malaria prevention Economic evaluation LLIN IRS Cost-effectiveness |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in ethiopia |
topic | Malaria Malaria prevention Economic evaluation LLIN IRS Cost-effectiveness |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alemayehuhailu costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia AT berntlindtjørn costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia AT wakgarideressa costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia AT tayegari costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia AT eskindirloha costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia AT bjarnerobberstad costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia |