Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia

Abstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alemayehu Hailu, Bernt Lindtjørn, Wakgari Deressa, Taye Gari, Eskindir Loha, Bjarne Robberstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1
_version_ 1828160737851211776
author Alemayehu Hailu
Bernt Lindtjørn
Wakgari Deressa
Taye Gari
Eskindir Loha
Bjarne Robberstad
author_facet Alemayehu Hailu
Bernt Lindtjørn
Wakgari Deressa
Taye Gari
Eskindir Loha
Bjarne Robberstad
author_sort Alemayehu Hailu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) with respect to the added protection afforded is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of combined implementation of LLINs and IRS, compared with LLINs alone, IRS alone, and routine practice in Ethiopia. Methods The study was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial of malaria prevention conducted in Adami Tullu district, in Ethiopia, from 2014 to 2016. In addition, literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis—using effectiveness information from a systematic review of published articles was conducted. Costing of the interventions were done from the providers’ perspective. The health-effect was measured using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and combined with cost information using a Markov life-cycle model. In the base-case analysis, health-effects were based on the current trial, and in addition, a scenario analysis was performed based on a literature survey. Results The current trial-based analysis showed that routine practice is not less effective and therefore dominates both the combined intervention and singleton intervention due to lower costs. The literature-based analysis had shown that combined intervention had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 1403 per DALY averted, and USD 207 per DALY averted was estimated for LLIN alone. In order for the ICER for the combined intervention to be within a range of 1 GDP per capita per DALY averted, the annual malaria incidence in the area should be at least 13%, and the protective-effectiveness of combined implementation should be at least 53%. Conclusions Based on the current trial-based analysis, LLINs and IRS are not cost-effective compared to routine practice. However, based on the literature-based analysis, LLIN alone is likely to be cost-effective compared to 3 times GDP per capita per DALY averted. The annual malaria probability and protective-effectiveness of combined intervention are key determinants of the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Trial registration PACTR201411000882128 (Registered 8 September 2014). http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201411000882128
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:26:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcbd2b2b56234d2aa4c750d79dac7ef7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1478-7547
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:26:02Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
spelling doaj.art-bcbd2b2b56234d2aa4c750d79dac7ef72022-12-22T03:55:31ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472018-11-0116111710.1186/s12962-018-0164-1Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in EthiopiaAlemayehu Hailu0Bernt Lindtjørn1Wakgari Deressa2Taye Gari3Eskindir Loha4Bjarne Robberstad5Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa UniversitySchool of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa UniversitySchool of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa UniversityDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of BergenAbstract Background The effectiveness of long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), for malaria prevention, have been established in several studies. However, the available evidence about the additional resources required for a combined implementation (LLIN + IRS) with respect to the added protection afforded is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of combined implementation of LLINs and IRS, compared with LLINs alone, IRS alone, and routine practice in Ethiopia. Methods The study was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial of malaria prevention conducted in Adami Tullu district, in Ethiopia, from 2014 to 2016. In addition, literature-based cost-effectiveness analysis—using effectiveness information from a systematic review of published articles was conducted. Costing of the interventions were done from the providers’ perspective. The health-effect was measured using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and combined with cost information using a Markov life-cycle model. In the base-case analysis, health-effects were based on the current trial, and in addition, a scenario analysis was performed based on a literature survey. Results The current trial-based analysis showed that routine practice is not less effective and therefore dominates both the combined intervention and singleton intervention due to lower costs. The literature-based analysis had shown that combined intervention had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 1403 per DALY averted, and USD 207 per DALY averted was estimated for LLIN alone. In order for the ICER for the combined intervention to be within a range of 1 GDP per capita per DALY averted, the annual malaria incidence in the area should be at least 13%, and the protective-effectiveness of combined implementation should be at least 53%. Conclusions Based on the current trial-based analysis, LLINs and IRS are not cost-effective compared to routine practice. However, based on the literature-based analysis, LLIN alone is likely to be cost-effective compared to 3 times GDP per capita per DALY averted. The annual malaria probability and protective-effectiveness of combined intervention are key determinants of the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Trial registration PACTR201411000882128 (Registered 8 September 2014). http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201411000882128http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1MalariaMalaria preventionEconomic evaluationLLINIRSCost-effectiveness
spellingShingle Alemayehu Hailu
Bernt Lindtjørn
Wakgari Deressa
Taye Gari
Eskindir Loha
Bjarne Robberstad
Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Malaria
Malaria prevention
Economic evaluation
LLIN
IRS
Cost-effectiveness
title Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in Ethiopia
title_sort cost effectiveness of a combined intervention of long lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying compared with each intervention alone for malaria prevention in ethiopia
topic Malaria
Malaria prevention
Economic evaluation
LLIN
IRS
Cost-effectiveness
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0164-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alemayehuhailu costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia
AT berntlindtjørn costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia
AT wakgarideressa costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia
AT tayegari costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia
AT eskindirloha costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia
AT bjarnerobberstad costeffectivenessofacombinedinterventionoflonglastinginsecticidalnetsandindoorresidualsprayingcomparedwitheachinterventionaloneformalariapreventioninethiopia