Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in patients with uterine/vaginal vault prolapse. Methods Between January 2009 and June 2015, 16 women with apical prolapse underwent RSC. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Korean Continence Society
2017-03-01
|
| Series: | International Neurourology Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-1732642-321.pdf |
| _version_ | 1817969598909120512 |
|---|---|
| author | Hyun Hwan Sung Kwang Jin Ko Yoon Seok Suh Gyu Ha Ryu Kyu-Sung Lee |
| author_facet | Hyun Hwan Sung Kwang Jin Ko Yoon Seok Suh Gyu Ha Ryu Kyu-Sung Lee |
| author_sort | Hyun Hwan Sung |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in patients with uterine/vaginal vault prolapse. Methods Between January 2009 and June 2015, 16 women with apical prolapse underwent RSC. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination was performed, and treatment success was defined as the presence of grade 0 or I apical prolapse upon POP-Q examination at the final follow-up. Pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-SF 20) was administered at every follow-up. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered by telephone to evaluate patient satisfaction with the operation. Results Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–68 years), and follow-up duration was 25.3 months (IQR, 5.4–34.0 months). Thirteen women (81.3%) had ≥grade III apical prolapse. Operation time was 251 minutes (IQR, 236–288 minutes), and blood loss was 75 mL (IQR, 50–150 mL). Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 3–5 days). At the final follow-up, treatment success was reported in all patients, who presented grade 0 (n=8, 57.1%) and grade I (n=6, 42.9%) apical prolapse. Dramatic improvements in PFDI-SF 20 scores were noted after RSC (from 39 to 4; P=0.001). Most patients (12 of 13) were satisfied with RSC. An intraoperative complication (sacral venous plexus injury) was reported in 1 patient, and there was no conversion to open surgery. Mesh erosion was not reported. Conclusions RSC is an efficient and safe surgical option for apical prolapse repair. Most patients were satisfied with RSC. Thus, RSC might be one of the best treatment options for apical prolapse in women. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:23:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bcca08639cbf4fdd86c1b693d3cb257c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2093-4777 2093-6931 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:23:15Z |
| publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
| publisher | Korean Continence Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Neurourology Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-bcca08639cbf4fdd86c1b693d3cb257c2022-12-22T02:31:28ZengKorean Continence SocietyInternational Neurourology Journal2093-47772093-69312017-03-01211687410.5213/inj.1732642.321646Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ ProlapseHyun Hwan Sung0Kwang Jin Ko1Yoon Seok Suh2Gyu Ha Ryu3Kyu-Sung Lee4 Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea Office of R&D Strategy & Planning, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaPurpose This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in patients with uterine/vaginal vault prolapse. Methods Between January 2009 and June 2015, 16 women with apical prolapse underwent RSC. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination was performed, and treatment success was defined as the presence of grade 0 or I apical prolapse upon POP-Q examination at the final follow-up. Pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-SF 20) was administered at every follow-up. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered by telephone to evaluate patient satisfaction with the operation. Results Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–68 years), and follow-up duration was 25.3 months (IQR, 5.4–34.0 months). Thirteen women (81.3%) had ≥grade III apical prolapse. Operation time was 251 minutes (IQR, 236–288 minutes), and blood loss was 75 mL (IQR, 50–150 mL). Median hospital stay was 4 days (IQR, 3–5 days). At the final follow-up, treatment success was reported in all patients, who presented grade 0 (n=8, 57.1%) and grade I (n=6, 42.9%) apical prolapse. Dramatic improvements in PFDI-SF 20 scores were noted after RSC (from 39 to 4; P=0.001). Most patients (12 of 13) were satisfied with RSC. An intraoperative complication (sacral venous plexus injury) was reported in 1 patient, and there was no conversion to open surgery. Mesh erosion was not reported. Conclusions RSC is an efficient and safe surgical option for apical prolapse repair. Most patients were satisfied with RSC. Thus, RSC might be one of the best treatment options for apical prolapse in women.http://www.einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-1732642-321.pdfPelvic Organ ProlapseUterine ProlapseRobotic SacrocolpopexyRobotic Surgical Procedures |
| spellingShingle | Hyun Hwan Sung Kwang Jin Ko Yoon Seok Suh Gyu Ha Ryu Kyu-Sung Lee Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse International Neurourology Journal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Uterine Prolapse Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Robotic Surgical Procedures |
| title | Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| title_full | Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| title_fullStr | Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| title_short | Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| title_sort | surgical outcomes and safety of robotic sacrocolpopexy in women with apical pelvic organ prolapse |
| topic | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Uterine Prolapse Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Robotic Surgical Procedures |
| url | http://www.einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-1732642-321.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hyunhwansung surgicaloutcomesandsafetyofroboticsacrocolpopexyinwomenwithapicalpelvicorganprolapse AT kwangjinko surgicaloutcomesandsafetyofroboticsacrocolpopexyinwomenwithapicalpelvicorganprolapse AT yoonseoksuh surgicaloutcomesandsafetyofroboticsacrocolpopexyinwomenwithapicalpelvicorganprolapse AT gyuharyu surgicaloutcomesandsafetyofroboticsacrocolpopexyinwomenwithapicalpelvicorganprolapse AT kyusunglee surgicaloutcomesandsafetyofroboticsacrocolpopexyinwomenwithapicalpelvicorganprolapse |