Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors

The main objective of this study is to present patient compliance rates and influential factors for regular attendance in a systematic implant aftercare program (Supportive Implant Therapy; SIT) within a 10-year observation period. From 2005 to 2008, we identified 233 patients with 524 implants and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Mitschke, Stefanie Anna Peikert, Kirstin Vach, Eberhard Frisch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/6/1988
_version_ 1797564242104156160
author Julia Mitschke
Stefanie Anna Peikert
Kirstin Vach
Eberhard Frisch
author_facet Julia Mitschke
Stefanie Anna Peikert
Kirstin Vach
Eberhard Frisch
author_sort Julia Mitschke
collection DOAJ
description The main objective of this study is to present patient compliance rates and influential factors for regular attendance in a systematic implant aftercare program (Supportive Implant Therapy; SIT) within a 10-year observation period. From 2005 to 2008, we identified 233 patients with 524 implants and implant-supported restorations at the study center. They had been instructed to attend an SIT program with 3-month recall intervals. A 2019 clinical prospective cohort study on 10-year compliance rates was performed. Data were assessed yearly in regression analyses to identify influential factors. Noncompliance rates increased during the period (4.8%, year 1; 39.7%, year 10). Total noncompliance was observed in four patients (1.7%) with 10 implants. “Age,” “Gender,” “Diabetes”, and “Surgical case complexity” showed no correlation with patient compliance. “Smoking” and “Cardiovascular diseases” significantly influenced patients in one of ten years, while “Number of implants per patient”, “Type of implant-supported prostheses”, and “Pre-existing experience in a prophylaxis program” reached significance after several years. When patients with implant-supported restorations are strongly recommended and frequently remotivated to comply with an SIT program with 3-month recall, an approximately 60% compliance rate after 10 years is achievable. Previous prophylaxis program experience, increased number of implants per patient, and removable implant-supported prostheses may be strong influential factors for increased patient compliance.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:54:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcd36ce2227c4c38992377fe02c3dfca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:54:36Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-bcd36ce2227c4c38992377fe02c3dfca2023-11-20T04:54:47ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-06-0196198810.3390/jcm9061988Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting FactorsJulia Mitschke0Stefanie Anna Peikert1Kirstin Vach2Eberhard Frisch3Northern Hessia Implant Center, D-34369 Hofgeismar, GermanyDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, D-79106 Freiburg, GermanyInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, GermanyNorthern Hessia Implant Center, D-34369 Hofgeismar, GermanyThe main objective of this study is to present patient compliance rates and influential factors for regular attendance in a systematic implant aftercare program (Supportive Implant Therapy; SIT) within a 10-year observation period. From 2005 to 2008, we identified 233 patients with 524 implants and implant-supported restorations at the study center. They had been instructed to attend an SIT program with 3-month recall intervals. A 2019 clinical prospective cohort study on 10-year compliance rates was performed. Data were assessed yearly in regression analyses to identify influential factors. Noncompliance rates increased during the period (4.8%, year 1; 39.7%, year 10). Total noncompliance was observed in four patients (1.7%) with 10 implants. “Age,” “Gender,” “Diabetes”, and “Surgical case complexity” showed no correlation with patient compliance. “Smoking” and “Cardiovascular diseases” significantly influenced patients in one of ten years, while “Number of implants per patient”, “Type of implant-supported prostheses”, and “Pre-existing experience in a prophylaxis program” reached significance after several years. When patients with implant-supported restorations are strongly recommended and frequently remotivated to comply with an SIT program with 3-month recall, an approximately 60% compliance rate after 10 years is achievable. Previous prophylaxis program experience, increased number of implants per patient, and removable implant-supported prostheses may be strong influential factors for increased patient compliance.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/6/1988dental implantscomplianceaftercarelong-term results
spellingShingle Julia Mitschke
Stefanie Anna Peikert
Kirstin Vach
Eberhard Frisch
Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
Journal of Clinical Medicine
dental implants
compliance
aftercare
long-term results
title Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
title_full Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
title_fullStr Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
title_full_unstemmed Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
title_short Supportive Implant Therapy (SIT): A Prospective 10-Year Study of Patient Compliance Rates and Impacting Factors
title_sort supportive implant therapy sit a prospective 10 year study of patient compliance rates and impacting factors
topic dental implants
compliance
aftercare
long-term results
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/6/1988
work_keys_str_mv AT juliamitschke supportiveimplanttherapysitaprospective10yearstudyofpatientcomplianceratesandimpactingfactors
AT stefanieannapeikert supportiveimplanttherapysitaprospective10yearstudyofpatientcomplianceratesandimpactingfactors
AT kirstinvach supportiveimplanttherapysitaprospective10yearstudyofpatientcomplianceratesandimpactingfactors
AT eberhardfrisch supportiveimplanttherapysitaprospective10yearstudyofpatientcomplianceratesandimpactingfactors