Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens

Background: The use of virtual microscopy (VM) in clinical cytology has been limited due to the inability to focus through three dimensional (3D) cell clusters with a single focal plane (2D images). Limited information exists regarding the optimal scanning parameters for 3D scanning. Aims: The purpo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amber D Donnelly, Maheswari S Mukherjee, Elizabeth R Lyden, Julia A Bridge, Subodh M Lele, Najia Wright, Mary F McGaughey, Alicia M Culberson, Adam J Horn, Whitney R Wedel, Stanley J Radio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=38;epage=38;aulast=Donnelly
_version_ 1818534675451215872
author Amber D Donnelly
Maheswari S Mukherjee
Elizabeth R Lyden
Julia A Bridge
Subodh M Lele
Najia Wright
Mary F McGaughey
Alicia M Culberson
Adam J Horn
Whitney R Wedel
Stanley J Radio
author_facet Amber D Donnelly
Maheswari S Mukherjee
Elizabeth R Lyden
Julia A Bridge
Subodh M Lele
Najia Wright
Mary F McGaughey
Alicia M Culberson
Adam J Horn
Whitney R Wedel
Stanley J Radio
author_sort Amber D Donnelly
collection DOAJ
description Background: The use of virtual microscopy (VM) in clinical cytology has been limited due to the inability to focus through three dimensional (3D) cell clusters with a single focal plane (2D images). Limited information exists regarding the optimal scanning parameters for 3D scanning. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal number of the focal plane levels and the optimal scanning interval to digitize gynecological (GYN) specimens prepared on SurePath™ glass slides while maintaining a manageable file size. Subjects and Methods: The iScanCoreo Au scanner (Ventana, AZ, USA) was used to digitize 192 SurePath™ glass slides at three focal plane levels at 1 μ interval. The digitized virtual images (VI) were annotated using BioImagene′s Image Viewer. Five participants interpreted the VI and recorded the focal plane level at which they felt confident and later interpreted the corresponding glass slide specimens using light microscopy (LM). The participants completed a survey about their experiences. Inter-rater agreement and concordance between the VI and the glass slide specimens were evaluated. Results: This study determined an overall high intra-rater diagnostic concordance between glass and VI (89-97%), however, the inter-rater agreement for all cases was higher for LM (94%) compared with VM (82%). Survey results indicate participants found low grade dysplasia and koilocytes easy to diagnose using three focal plane levels, the image enhancement tool was useful and focusing through the cells helped with interpretation; however, the participants found VI with hyperchromatic crowded groups challenging to interpret. Participants reported they prefer using LM over VM. This study supports using three focal plane levels and 1 μ interval to expand the use of VM in GYN cytology. Conclusion: Future improvements in technology and appropriate training should make this format a more preferable and practical option in clinical cytology.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:14:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcd4663efb404800bdf24718f9726ff7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2153-3539
2153-3539
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:14:38Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
spelling doaj.art-bcd4663efb404800bdf24718f9726ff72022-12-22T00:55:28ZengElsevierJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392153-35392013-01-0141383810.4103/2153-3539.124015Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimensAmber D DonnellyMaheswari S MukherjeeElizabeth R LydenJulia A BridgeSubodh M LeleNajia WrightMary F McGaugheyAlicia M CulbersonAdam J HornWhitney R WedelStanley J RadioBackground: The use of virtual microscopy (VM) in clinical cytology has been limited due to the inability to focus through three dimensional (3D) cell clusters with a single focal plane (2D images). Limited information exists regarding the optimal scanning parameters for 3D scanning. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal number of the focal plane levels and the optimal scanning interval to digitize gynecological (GYN) specimens prepared on SurePath™ glass slides while maintaining a manageable file size. Subjects and Methods: The iScanCoreo Au scanner (Ventana, AZ, USA) was used to digitize 192 SurePath™ glass slides at three focal plane levels at 1 μ interval. The digitized virtual images (VI) were annotated using BioImagene′s Image Viewer. Five participants interpreted the VI and recorded the focal plane level at which they felt confident and later interpreted the corresponding glass slide specimens using light microscopy (LM). The participants completed a survey about their experiences. Inter-rater agreement and concordance between the VI and the glass slide specimens were evaluated. Results: This study determined an overall high intra-rater diagnostic concordance between glass and VI (89-97%), however, the inter-rater agreement for all cases was higher for LM (94%) compared with VM (82%). Survey results indicate participants found low grade dysplasia and koilocytes easy to diagnose using three focal plane levels, the image enhancement tool was useful and focusing through the cells helped with interpretation; however, the participants found VI with hyperchromatic crowded groups challenging to interpret. Participants reported they prefer using LM over VM. This study supports using three focal plane levels and 1 μ interval to expand the use of VM in GYN cytology. Conclusion: Future improvements in technology and appropriate training should make this format a more preferable and practical option in clinical cytology.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=38;epage=38;aulast=DonnellyCytologydigital pathologyvirtual microscopyz-axis
spellingShingle Amber D Donnelly
Maheswari S Mukherjee
Elizabeth R Lyden
Julia A Bridge
Subodh M Lele
Najia Wright
Mary F McGaughey
Alicia M Culberson
Adam J Horn
Whitney R Wedel
Stanley J Radio
Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Cytology
digital pathology
virtual microscopy
z-axis
title Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
title_full Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
title_fullStr Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
title_full_unstemmed Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
title_short Optimal z-axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
title_sort optimal z axis scanning parameters for gynecologic cytology specimens
topic Cytology
digital pathology
virtual microscopy
z-axis
url http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2013;volume=4;issue=1;spage=38;epage=38;aulast=Donnelly
work_keys_str_mv AT amberddonnelly optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT maheswarismukherjee optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT elizabethrlyden optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT juliaabridge optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT subodhmlele optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT najiawright optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT maryfmcgaughey optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT aliciamculberson optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT adamjhorn optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT whitneyrwedel optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens
AT stanleyjradio optimalzaxisscanningparametersforgynecologiccytologyspecimens