Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report

Abstract Background Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermitten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marija Malgaj Vrečko, Jernej Pajek, Jadranka Buturović-Ponikvar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-10-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02960-y
_version_ 1811192408786862080
author Marija Malgaj Vrečko
Jernej Pajek
Jadranka Buturović-Ponikvar
author_facet Marija Malgaj Vrečko
Jernej Pajek
Jadranka Buturović-Ponikvar
author_sort Marija Malgaj Vrečko
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermittent hemodialysis modalities, especially for patients with contraindications for heparin. With the increased adoption of medium cut-off membranes, experience with regional citrate anticoagulation is needed. To our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the feasibility of regional citrate anticoagulation in expanded hemodialysis. Methods We prospectively analyzed 5 expanded hemodialysis procedures in 5 patients in which a medium cut-off membrane (Theranova®) was used. We followed our standard citrate protocol developed and tested for high-flux membrane. Anticoagulation was performed with a continuous infusion of 8% trisodium citrate into the arterial line and supplementation of 1 M calcium chloride into the venous line. We monitored ionized calcium and magnesium, sodium and blood gas analysis. Anticoagulation effectiveness was assessed by post-filter ionized calcium and by visual inspection of the anticoagulation in the circuit. Results There were no prematurely terminated procedures due to anticoagulation-related complications. With a blood flow of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 500 mL/min, we were able to maintain serum ionized calcium in the range of 0.89–1.29 mmol/L and serum sodium in the range of 136–144 mmol/L. The mean pre- and post-dialysis arterial circuit pH was 7.42 (± 0.04) and 7.53 (± 0.23), respectively. The mean pre- and post-dialysis serum ionized magnesium was 0.54 (± 0.04) mmol/L and 0.43 (± 0.03) mmol/L, respectively (measurements were done on a point-of-care ionometer with a lower normal range for ionized magnesium). Conclusion We have shown that our standard citrate protocol for high-flux hemodialysis membrane could be successfully adopted for use in expanded hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane. Overall, electrolyte and acid-base balances were relatively well-controlled and anticoagulation effectiveness was excellent. Trial registration This is a pilot report with results taken from a larger ongoing trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 25, 2019 under number NCT04139525) comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation during expanded hemodialysis.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:52:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bcedb79ed4ba45e3aec6203acebef643
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:52:16Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-bcedb79ed4ba45e3aec6203acebef6432022-12-22T03:56:28ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692022-10-012311510.1186/s12882-022-02960-yUse of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot reportMarija Malgaj Vrečko0Jernej Pajek1Jadranka Buturović-Ponikvar2Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaAbstract Background Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermittent hemodialysis modalities, especially for patients with contraindications for heparin. With the increased adoption of medium cut-off membranes, experience with regional citrate anticoagulation is needed. To our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the feasibility of regional citrate anticoagulation in expanded hemodialysis. Methods We prospectively analyzed 5 expanded hemodialysis procedures in 5 patients in which a medium cut-off membrane (Theranova®) was used. We followed our standard citrate protocol developed and tested for high-flux membrane. Anticoagulation was performed with a continuous infusion of 8% trisodium citrate into the arterial line and supplementation of 1 M calcium chloride into the venous line. We monitored ionized calcium and magnesium, sodium and blood gas analysis. Anticoagulation effectiveness was assessed by post-filter ionized calcium and by visual inspection of the anticoagulation in the circuit. Results There were no prematurely terminated procedures due to anticoagulation-related complications. With a blood flow of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 500 mL/min, we were able to maintain serum ionized calcium in the range of 0.89–1.29 mmol/L and serum sodium in the range of 136–144 mmol/L. The mean pre- and post-dialysis arterial circuit pH was 7.42 (± 0.04) and 7.53 (± 0.23), respectively. The mean pre- and post-dialysis serum ionized magnesium was 0.54 (± 0.04) mmol/L and 0.43 (± 0.03) mmol/L, respectively (measurements were done on a point-of-care ionometer with a lower normal range for ionized magnesium). Conclusion We have shown that our standard citrate protocol for high-flux hemodialysis membrane could be successfully adopted for use in expanded hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane. Overall, electrolyte and acid-base balances were relatively well-controlled and anticoagulation effectiveness was excellent. Trial registration This is a pilot report with results taken from a larger ongoing trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 25, 2019 under number NCT04139525) comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation during expanded hemodialysis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02960-yExpanded hemodialysisAnticoagulationCitrateCalciumMagnesium
spellingShingle Marija Malgaj Vrečko
Jernej Pajek
Jadranka Buturović-Ponikvar
Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
BMC Nephrology
Expanded hemodialysis
Anticoagulation
Citrate
Calcium
Magnesium
title Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
title_full Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
title_fullStr Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
title_full_unstemmed Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
title_short Use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut-off membrane: pilot report
title_sort use of regional citrate anticoagulation with medium cut off membrane pilot report
topic Expanded hemodialysis
Anticoagulation
Citrate
Calcium
Magnesium
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02960-y
work_keys_str_mv AT marijamalgajvrecko useofregionalcitrateanticoagulationwithmediumcutoffmembranepilotreport
AT jernejpajek useofregionalcitrateanticoagulationwithmediumcutoffmembranepilotreport
AT jadrankabuturovicponikvar useofregionalcitrateanticoagulationwithmediumcutoffmembranepilotreport