Att konstruera begåvning

Throughout the 20th century, the nature of intelligence has been a hot topic and an intensely debated issue. It is the measuring and testing of intelligence, in particular, that has aroused the strongest reactions from defenders and protesters alike. The discussion on intelligence tests have freque...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thom Axelsson
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Malmö University Press 2012-03-01
Series:Educare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/educare/article/view/1189
_version_ 1797454516252049408
author Thom Axelsson
author_facet Thom Axelsson
author_sort Thom Axelsson
collection DOAJ
description Throughout the 20th century, the nature of intelligence has been a hot topic and an intensely debated issue. It is the measuring and testing of intelligence, in particular, that has aroused the strongest reactions from defenders and protesters alike. The discussion on intelligence tests have frequently revolved around questions such as whether these tests will lead to an increased social mobility and liberation or, on the contrary, to exclusion and discrimination of certain groups. The focus of the present article, however, is not the consequences of intelligence testing but rather the debate concerning the testing within the research community. This debate is approached from three different perspectives: a historical perspective, a psychological perspective, and a perspective allowed for by discourse analysis. Having done this, I discuss one other tentative way of dealing with intelligence testing that does not necessarily have to involve narratives of liberation or of oppression. This is done with the help of Michel Foucault’s concept ‘governmentality’.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:39:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd08b06812ca4532900dc6b8e723726d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2004-5190
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:39:18Z
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher Malmö University Press
record_format Article
series Educare
spelling doaj.art-bd08b06812ca4532900dc6b8e723726d2023-11-25T09:46:25ZdanMalmö University PressEducare2004-51902012-03-01110.24834/educare.2012.1.1189Att konstruera begåvningThom Axelsson Throughout the 20th century, the nature of intelligence has been a hot topic and an intensely debated issue. It is the measuring and testing of intelligence, in particular, that has aroused the strongest reactions from defenders and protesters alike. The discussion on intelligence tests have frequently revolved around questions such as whether these tests will lead to an increased social mobility and liberation or, on the contrary, to exclusion and discrimination of certain groups. The focus of the present article, however, is not the consequences of intelligence testing but rather the debate concerning the testing within the research community. This debate is approached from three different perspectives: a historical perspective, a psychological perspective, and a perspective allowed for by discourse analysis. Having done this, I discuss one other tentative way of dealing with intelligence testing that does not necessarily have to involve narratives of liberation or of oppression. This is done with the help of Michel Foucault’s concept ‘governmentality’. https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/educare/article/view/1189Foucaultgovernmentalityintelligence testingpowerknowledge
spellingShingle Thom Axelsson
Att konstruera begåvning
Educare
Foucault
governmentality
intelligence testing
power
knowledge
title Att konstruera begåvning
title_full Att konstruera begåvning
title_fullStr Att konstruera begåvning
title_full_unstemmed Att konstruera begåvning
title_short Att konstruera begåvning
title_sort att konstruera begavning
topic Foucault
governmentality
intelligence testing
power
knowledge
url https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/educare/article/view/1189
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaxelsson attkonstruerabegavning