Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review

Introduction:The proportion of people aged over 60 years is increasing globally and expected to double by 2050 [1]. The World Health Organization and health systems globally have identified mobile health (mHealth) as an important strategy to address the health needs of this growing population group....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siaw-Teng Liaw, Sameera Ansari, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Padmanesan Narasimhan, Md Mahfuz Ashraf, Ben Harris-Roxas, Mark Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-08-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijic.org/articles/4893
_version_ 1819038261386936320
author Siaw-Teng Liaw
Sameera Ansari
Jitendra Jonnagaddala
Padmanesan Narasimhan
Md Mahfuz Ashraf
Ben Harris-Roxas
Mark Harris
author_facet Siaw-Teng Liaw
Sameera Ansari
Jitendra Jonnagaddala
Padmanesan Narasimhan
Md Mahfuz Ashraf
Ben Harris-Roxas
Mark Harris
author_sort Siaw-Teng Liaw
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:The proportion of people aged over 60 years is increasing globally and expected to double by 2050 [1]. The World Health Organization and health systems globally have identified mobile health (mHealth) as an important strategy to address the health needs of this growing population group. Healthcare innovations focused on ageing, including mHealth interventions, provide an opportunity to enhance service delivery. A systematic review [2] was undertaken to answer the following questions: 1. How is mHealth being used to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services? 2. What are the effective models for implementing mHealth interventions? 3. What are the lessons learnt from implementation of mHealth initiatives? 4. Is there enough evidence to support the impact of mHealth interventions? Methods:The review was conducted in late 2017, following the PRISMA[3] guidelines for systematic reviews. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched.A combination of the terms ‘mHealth OR mobile health’ AND 'healthy ageing’ AND 'aged care’ was used along with the five domains of the RE-AIM framework [4]. The inclusion criteria were: (i) literature published from 2007 to 2017 on mHealth interventions, and (ii) mHealth interventions conducted on people aged 45 years and older. Results:Of 2883 records identified, 133 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most mHealth interventions were an adjunct to existing age-friendly health services, particularly for older adults with chronic health conditions. There were no examples of scaled-up implementations or systematic evaluations of successful feasibility and usability studies that implemented mHealth.The rapid pace of technological change as well as development, adoption and demise of mHealth apps presents crucial challenges for consumers, health care providers and policy makers. Overall, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding cost-effectiveness of mHealth to improve healthy ageing and support age-friendly health services. Implications for policy, practice and research: Future mHealth research needs robust experimental designs and a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach that looks at multi-level determinants of health care. Collaborative partnerships for the design, development, testing, implementation and evaluation of mHealth apps are essential.Robust governance frameworks for mHealth strategies are also required, as there is a risk the mHealth initiatives will further fragment care due to development and use of too many disparate apps and platforms without shared data frameworks or governance. References: 1. World Health Organization (2016). World report on ageing and health 2015. 2. Liaw ST, Ansari S, Jonnagaddala J, Narasimhan P, Ashraf MM, Harris-Roxas B and Harris M (2017). A systematic review of the use of mHealth to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services. PROSPERO CRD42017082383. 3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG and Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 6(7):e1000097. 4. Gaglio B, Shoup JA and Glasgow RE (2013). The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time. American Journal of Public Health. 103(6):e38-e46.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:34:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd224c504bc54158b4aa8d1be1d101f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1568-4156
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:34:30Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of Integrated Care
spelling doaj.art-bd224c504bc54158b4aa8d1be1d101f52022-12-21T19:10:07ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562019-08-0119410.5334/ijic.s31474264Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic reviewSiaw-Teng Liaw0Sameera Ansari1Jitendra Jonnagaddala2Padmanesan Narasimhan3Md Mahfuz Ashraf4Ben Harris-Roxas5Mark Harris6School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South WalesCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South WalesSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South WalesSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South WalesSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South WalesCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South WalesCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South WalesIntroduction:The proportion of people aged over 60 years is increasing globally and expected to double by 2050 [1]. The World Health Organization and health systems globally have identified mobile health (mHealth) as an important strategy to address the health needs of this growing population group. Healthcare innovations focused on ageing, including mHealth interventions, provide an opportunity to enhance service delivery. A systematic review [2] was undertaken to answer the following questions: 1. How is mHealth being used to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services? 2. What are the effective models for implementing mHealth interventions? 3. What are the lessons learnt from implementation of mHealth initiatives? 4. Is there enough evidence to support the impact of mHealth interventions? Methods:The review was conducted in late 2017, following the PRISMA[3] guidelines for systematic reviews. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched.A combination of the terms ‘mHealth OR mobile health’ AND 'healthy ageing’ AND 'aged care’ was used along with the five domains of the RE-AIM framework [4]. The inclusion criteria were: (i) literature published from 2007 to 2017 on mHealth interventions, and (ii) mHealth interventions conducted on people aged 45 years and older. Results:Of 2883 records identified, 133 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most mHealth interventions were an adjunct to existing age-friendly health services, particularly for older adults with chronic health conditions. There were no examples of scaled-up implementations or systematic evaluations of successful feasibility and usability studies that implemented mHealth.The rapid pace of technological change as well as development, adoption and demise of mHealth apps presents crucial challenges for consumers, health care providers and policy makers. Overall, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding cost-effectiveness of mHealth to improve healthy ageing and support age-friendly health services. Implications for policy, practice and research: Future mHealth research needs robust experimental designs and a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach that looks at multi-level determinants of health care. Collaborative partnerships for the design, development, testing, implementation and evaluation of mHealth apps are essential.Robust governance frameworks for mHealth strategies are also required, as there is a risk the mHealth initiatives will further fragment care due to development and use of too many disparate apps and platforms without shared data frameworks or governance. References: 1. World Health Organization (2016). World report on ageing and health 2015. 2. Liaw ST, Ansari S, Jonnagaddala J, Narasimhan P, Ashraf MM, Harris-Roxas B and Harris M (2017). A systematic review of the use of mHealth to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services. PROSPERO CRD42017082383. 3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG and Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 6(7):e1000097. 4. Gaglio B, Shoup JA and Glasgow RE (2013). The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time. American Journal of Public Health. 103(6):e38-e46.https://www.ijic.org/articles/4893mhealthsystematic reviewageingaged care
spellingShingle Siaw-Teng Liaw
Sameera Ansari
Jitendra Jonnagaddala
Padmanesan Narasimhan
Md Mahfuz Ashraf
Ben Harris-Roxas
Mark Harris
Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
International Journal of Integrated Care
mhealth
systematic review
ageing
aged care
title Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
title_full Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
title_fullStr Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
title_short Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
title_sort use of mhealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age friendly care services a systematic review
topic mhealth
systematic review
ageing
aged care
url https://www.ijic.org/articles/4893
work_keys_str_mv AT siawtengliaw useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT sameeraansari useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT jitendrajonnagaddala useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT padmanesannarasimhan useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT mdmahfuzashraf useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT benharrisroxas useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview
AT markharris useofmhealthforpromotinghealthyageingandsupportingdeliveryofagefriendlycareservicesasystematicreview