The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes

Toothbrushes play a central role in oral hygiene and must be considered one of the most common articles of daily use. We analysed the bacterial colonization of used toothbrushes by next generation sequencing (NGS) and by cultivation on different media. Furthermore, we determined the occurrence of an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc-Kevin Zinn, Laura Schages, Dirk Bockmühl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/9/1379
_version_ 1797554228246347776
author Marc-Kevin Zinn
Laura Schages
Dirk Bockmühl
author_facet Marc-Kevin Zinn
Laura Schages
Dirk Bockmühl
author_sort Marc-Kevin Zinn
collection DOAJ
description Toothbrushes play a central role in oral hygiene and must be considered one of the most common articles of daily use. We analysed the bacterial colonization of used toothbrushes by next generation sequencing (NGS) and by cultivation on different media. Furthermore, we determined the occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and the impact of different bristle materials on microbial growth and survival. NGS data revealed that <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, <i>Micrococcaceae</i>, <i>Actinomycetaceae</i>, and <i>Streptococcaceae</i> comprise major parts of the toothbrush microbiome. The composition of the microbiome differed depending on the period of use or user age. While higher fractions of <i>Actinomycetales</i>, <i>Lactobacillales</i>, and <i>Enterobacterales</i> were found after shorter periods, <i>Micrococcales</i> dominated on both toothbrushes used for more than four weeks and on toothbrushes of older users, while in-vitro tests revealed increasing counts of <i>Micrococcus</i> on all bristle materials as well. Compared to other environments, we found a rather low frequency of ARGs. We determined bacterial counts between 1.42 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 1.19 × 10<sup>7</sup> cfu/toothbrush on used toothbrushes and no significant effect of different bristles materials on bacterial survival or growth. Our study illustrates that toothbrushes harbor various microorganisms and that both period of use and user age might affect the microbial composition.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:28:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd2445e5fd3342cb8b158a34d5d97e8b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:28:57Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-bd2445e5fd3342cb8b158a34d5d97e8b2023-11-20T13:02:05ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072020-09-0189137910.3390/microorganisms8091379The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of ToothbrushesMarc-Kevin Zinn0Laura Schages1Dirk Bockmühl2Faculty of Life Sciences, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, 47533 Kleve, GermanyFaculty of Life Sciences, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, 47533 Kleve, GermanyFaculty of Life Sciences, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, 47533 Kleve, GermanyToothbrushes play a central role in oral hygiene and must be considered one of the most common articles of daily use. We analysed the bacterial colonization of used toothbrushes by next generation sequencing (NGS) and by cultivation on different media. Furthermore, we determined the occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and the impact of different bristle materials on microbial growth and survival. NGS data revealed that <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, <i>Micrococcaceae</i>, <i>Actinomycetaceae</i>, and <i>Streptococcaceae</i> comprise major parts of the toothbrush microbiome. The composition of the microbiome differed depending on the period of use or user age. While higher fractions of <i>Actinomycetales</i>, <i>Lactobacillales</i>, and <i>Enterobacterales</i> were found after shorter periods, <i>Micrococcales</i> dominated on both toothbrushes used for more than four weeks and on toothbrushes of older users, while in-vitro tests revealed increasing counts of <i>Micrococcus</i> on all bristle materials as well. Compared to other environments, we found a rather low frequency of ARGs. We determined bacterial counts between 1.42 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 1.19 × 10<sup>7</sup> cfu/toothbrush on used toothbrushes and no significant effect of different bristles materials on bacterial survival or growth. Our study illustrates that toothbrushes harbor various microorganisms and that both period of use and user age might affect the microbial composition.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/9/1379toothbrushoral microbiomemicrobial contaminationantibiotic resistance
spellingShingle Marc-Kevin Zinn
Laura Schages
Dirk Bockmühl
The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
Microorganisms
toothbrush
oral microbiome
microbial contamination
antibiotic resistance
title The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
title_full The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
title_fullStr The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
title_full_unstemmed The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
title_short The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes
title_sort toothbrush microbiome impact of user age period of use and bristle material on the microbial communities of toothbrushes
topic toothbrush
oral microbiome
microbial contamination
antibiotic resistance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/9/1379
work_keys_str_mv AT marckevinzinn thetoothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes
AT lauraschages thetoothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes
AT dirkbockmuhl thetoothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes
AT marckevinzinn toothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes
AT lauraschages toothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes
AT dirkbockmuhl toothbrushmicrobiomeimpactofuserageperiodofuseandbristlematerialonthemicrobialcommunitiesoftoothbrushes