A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma

Background: Monoclonal gammopathies and multiple myeloma should be screened in the primary care setting. Methods: The screening strategy consisted of an initial interview supported with the analysis of basic laboratory test results and the increasing laboratory workload in the following steps was de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Morawska, Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek, Tomasz Stompór, Piotr Ligocki, Marek Stopiński, Michał Sutkowski, Norbert Grząśko, Anna Kordecka, Mariusz Kordecki, Artur Jurczyszyn, Dominik Dytfeld, Tomasz Wróbel, Krzysztof Jamroziak, Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek, Adam Walter-Croneck, Krzysztof Giannopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1345
_version_ 1797620217731350528
author Marta Morawska
Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek
Tomasz Stompór
Piotr Ligocki
Marek Stopiński
Michał Sutkowski
Norbert Grząśko
Anna Kordecka
Mariusz Kordecki
Artur Jurczyszyn
Dominik Dytfeld
Tomasz Wróbel
Krzysztof Jamroziak
Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek
Adam Walter-Croneck
Krzysztof Giannopoulos
author_facet Marta Morawska
Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek
Tomasz Stompór
Piotr Ligocki
Marek Stopiński
Michał Sutkowski
Norbert Grząśko
Anna Kordecka
Mariusz Kordecki
Artur Jurczyszyn
Dominik Dytfeld
Tomasz Wróbel
Krzysztof Jamroziak
Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek
Adam Walter-Croneck
Krzysztof Giannopoulos
author_sort Marta Morawska
collection DOAJ
description Background: Monoclonal gammopathies and multiple myeloma should be screened in the primary care setting. Methods: The screening strategy consisted of an initial interview supported with the analysis of basic laboratory test results and the increasing laboratory workload in the following steps was developed based on characteristics of patients with multiple myeloma. Results: The developed 3-step screening protocol includes evaluation of myeloma-related bone disease, two renal function markers, and three hematologic markers. In the second step, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) were cross-tabulated to identify persons qualifying for confirmation of the presence of monoclonal component. Patients with diagnosed monoclonal gammopathy should be referred to a specialized center to confirm the diagnosis. The screening protocol testing identified 900 patients with increased ESR and normal level of CRP and 94 of them (10.4%) had positive immunofixation. Conclusions: The proposed screening strategy resulted in an efficient diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy. The stepwise approach rationalized the diagnostic workload and cost of screening. The protocol would support primary care physicians, standardizing the knowledge about the clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma and the method of evaluation of symptoms and diagnostic test results.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:38:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bd42a2aecce04986a5dbdbf29d722d77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:38:59Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-bd42a2aecce04986a5dbdbf29d722d772023-11-16T21:18:17ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-02-01124134510.3390/jcm12041345A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple MyelomaMarta Morawska0Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek1Tomasz Stompór2Piotr Ligocki3Marek Stopiński4Michał Sutkowski5Norbert Grząśko6Anna Kordecka7Mariusz Kordecki8Artur Jurczyszyn9Dominik Dytfeld10Tomasz Wróbel11Krzysztof Jamroziak12Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek13Adam Walter-Croneck14Krzysztof Giannopoulos15Experimental Hematooncology Department, Medical University of Lublin & Hematology Department, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-093 Lublin, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Nephrology, Hypertension and Internal Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Internal Diseases, Clinical Department of Rheumatology, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic IPHC in Bydgoszcz, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, PolandInternal Department, Geriatric Unit, John Paul II Western Hospital in Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 05-825 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, PolandCollege of Family Physicians in Poland, 00-209 Warsaw, PolandExperimental Hematooncology Department, Medical University of Lublin & Hematology Department, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-093 Lublin, PolandHTA Registry, 30-552 Krakow, PolandHTA Registry, 30-552 Krakow, PolandPlasma Cell Dyscrasia Center, Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-007 Krakow, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-512 Poznan, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 00-001 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Haemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, PolandExperimental Hematooncology Department, Medical University of Lublin & Hematology Department, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-093 Lublin, PolandBackground: Monoclonal gammopathies and multiple myeloma should be screened in the primary care setting. Methods: The screening strategy consisted of an initial interview supported with the analysis of basic laboratory test results and the increasing laboratory workload in the following steps was developed based on characteristics of patients with multiple myeloma. Results: The developed 3-step screening protocol includes evaluation of myeloma-related bone disease, two renal function markers, and three hematologic markers. In the second step, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) were cross-tabulated to identify persons qualifying for confirmation of the presence of monoclonal component. Patients with diagnosed monoclonal gammopathy should be referred to a specialized center to confirm the diagnosis. The screening protocol testing identified 900 patients with increased ESR and normal level of CRP and 94 of them (10.4%) had positive immunofixation. Conclusions: The proposed screening strategy resulted in an efficient diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy. The stepwise approach rationalized the diagnostic workload and cost of screening. The protocol would support primary care physicians, standardizing the knowledge about the clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma and the method of evaluation of symptoms and diagnostic test results.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1345monoclonal gammopathymultiple myelomascreening
spellingShingle Marta Morawska
Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek
Tomasz Stompór
Piotr Ligocki
Marek Stopiński
Michał Sutkowski
Norbert Grząśko
Anna Kordecka
Mariusz Kordecki
Artur Jurczyszyn
Dominik Dytfeld
Tomasz Wróbel
Krzysztof Jamroziak
Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek
Adam Walter-Croneck
Krzysztof Giannopoulos
A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
Journal of Clinical Medicine
monoclonal gammopathy
multiple myeloma
screening
title A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
title_full A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
title_short A Stepwise Screening Protocol for Multiple Myeloma
title_sort stepwise screening protocol for multiple myeloma
topic monoclonal gammopathy
multiple myeloma
screening
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1345
work_keys_str_mv AT martamorawska astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT jadwigadwilewicztrojaczek astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT tomaszstompor astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT piotrligocki astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT marekstopinski astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT michałsutkowski astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT norbertgrzasko astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT annakordecka astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT mariuszkordecki astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT arturjurczyszyn astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT dominikdytfeld astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT tomaszwrobel astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT krzysztofjamroziak astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT agnieszkadruzdsitek astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT adamwaltercroneck astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT krzysztofgiannopoulos astepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT martamorawska stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT jadwigadwilewicztrojaczek stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT tomaszstompor stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT piotrligocki stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT marekstopinski stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT michałsutkowski stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT norbertgrzasko stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT annakordecka stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT mariuszkordecki stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT arturjurczyszyn stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT dominikdytfeld stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT tomaszwrobel stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT krzysztofjamroziak stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT agnieszkadruzdsitek stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT adamwaltercroneck stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma
AT krzysztofgiannopoulos stepwisescreeningprotocolformultiplemyeloma